Open Access
Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 426, 2023
The 5th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2023)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01040 | |
Number of page(s) | 6 | |
Section | Integrated Sustainable Science and Technology Innovation | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342601040 | |
Published online | 15 September 2023 |
- S. Baker, P. Bradley, J. Huyton, and H. Baroch, Principles of Hotel Front Office Operations. Hospitality Press (1998) [Google Scholar]
- J. R. Walker, The restaurant: from concept to operation. John Wiley & Sons (2021) [Google Scholar]
- D. L. Santoso and A. Budiarti, “Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Struktur Modal pada Perusahaan Food and Beverages,” J. Ilmu Dan Ris. Manaj., vol. 6, no. 2 (2017) [Google Scholar]
- T. F. Tan and S. Netessine, “At your service on the table: Impact of tabletop technology on restaurant performance,” Manage. Sci., vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 4496–4515 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G. S. Indonesia, “About Us,” (2023) [Google Scholar]
- F. Dehotman, “Genki Sushi, Restoran Sushi Berteknologi Canggih dengan Konsep Pelayanan Cepat di Bandung,” Tribun Jabar, Bandung, p. 1, Nov. 16 (2018) [Google Scholar]
- Sushi Tei Indonesia, “About us,” (2013) [Google Scholar]
- U. Indonesia et al., “SERVICE BLUEPRINT GENKI SUSHI”. [Google Scholar]
- E. Rahma, “Genki Sushi Memulai Ekspansi Pasar di Sumatera,” Marketeers (2020) [Google Scholar]
- J. Hwang, H. Kim, J. J. Kim, and I. Kim, “Investigation of perceived risks and their outcome variables in the context of robotic restaurants,” J. Travel Tour. Mark., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 263–281 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- O. Al-Massalkhi, “Are Robots Taking Over Restaurants,” Forbes, 2023. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinesscouncil/2023/03/03/are-robots-taking-over-restaurants/?sh=57f071d42a31 (accessed Mar. 22, 2023) [Google Scholar]
- BigHospitality, “The Restaurant of the Future: 12 tech predictions,” William Reed, 2023. https://www.bighospitality.co.uk/Article/2023/01/30/Robots-and-AI-and-other-restaurant-technology-trends (accessed Mar. 20, 2023) [Google Scholar]
- K. H. Seo and J. H. Lee, “The emergence of service robots at restaurants: Integrating trust, perceived risk, and satisfaction,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 8, p. 4431 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- W.-H. Lee, C.-W. Lin, and K.-H. Shih, “A technology acceptance model for the perception of restaurant service robots for trust, interactivity, and output quality,” Int. J. Mob. Commun., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 361–376 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Najib and F. Fahma, “Investigating the adoption of digital payment system through an extended technology acceptance model: An insight from the Indonesian small and medium enterprises,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1702–1708 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- K. Park, N. Park, and W. Heo, “Factors influencing intranet acceptance in restaurant industry: use of technology acceptance model,” Int. Bus. Res., vol. 11, no. 10, p. 1 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- O. El-Said and S. Al Hajri, “Are customers happy with robot service? Investigating satisfaction with robot service restaurants during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 3, p. e08986 (2022) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- E. A. Sinambela, “Examining the Relationship between Tourist Motivation, Touristic Attractiveness, and Revisit Intention,” J. Soc. Sci. Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 25–30 (2021) [Google Scholar]
- C.-H. Lin, “Effects of cuisine experience, psychological well-being, and self-health perception on the revisit intention of hot springs tourists,” J. Hosp. Tour. Res., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 243–265 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- F. D. Davis, “A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results.” Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1985) [Google Scholar]
- H. J. Sung and H. M. Jeon, “Untact: Customer’s acceptance intention toward robot barista in coffee shop,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 20, p. 8598 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Hwang, S. Park, and I. Kim, “Understanding motivated consumer innovativeness in the context of a robotic restaurant: The moderating role of product knowledge,” J. Hosp. Tour. Manag., vol. 44, pp. 272–282 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- W. G. Kim and Y. J. Moon, “Customers’ cognitive, emotional, and actionable response to the servicescape: A test of the moderating effect of the restaurant type,” Int. J. Hosp. Manag., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 144–156 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. Watson, “Quantitative research,” Nurs. Stand., vol. 29, no. 31 (2015) [Google Scholar]
- A. Joshi, S. Kale, S. Chandel, and D. K. Pal, “Likert scale: Explored and explained,” Br. J. Appl. Sci. Technol., vol. 7, no. 4, p. 396 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.