EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 426 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 426 (2023) 01094 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 426, 2023
The 5th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2023)
Article Number 01094
Number of page(s) 6
Section Integrated Sustainable Science and Technology Innovation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342601094
Published online 15 September 2023
  1. Liang, S., & Lu, H. (2013). Adoption of e- government services: An empirical study of the online tax filing system in Taiwan. Emerald Insight, 37(3), 424-442. [Google Scholar]
  2. Koong, K., Bai, S., Tejinder, S., & Morris, C. (2019). Advancements and forecasts of electronic tax return and informational filings in the US. 27(2), 352-371. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mauliza, N., Muda, I., & Sibarani, R. (2022). An Analysis of Individual Taxpayers Behavior on the Use of E-Filing and E-Form in Submitting Annual Tax Return by Implementing a Phenomenological Approach. 5, 175-187. [Google Scholar]
  4. Eilu, E., Walyawula, C., & Soita, R. (2021). Assessment of Usability of Online Tax Return Services in Uganda and Its Influence on Tax Revenue, 113–118. [Google Scholar]
  5. Iivari, J. (2005). An Empirical Test of the DeLone- McLean Model of Information System Success. 36(2), 8–27. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zaied, A. (2012). An Integrated Success Model for Evaluating Information System in Public Sectors. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 3(6). [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang, Y., & Liao, Y. (2008). Assessing eGovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. 25(4), 717-733. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lee, H. (2016). Can Electronic Tax Invoicing Improve Tax Compliance? A Case Study of the Republic of Korea’s Electronic Tax Invoicing for Value-Added Tax, 7592. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mardiana, S., Tjakraatmadja, J., & Aprianingsih, A. (2015). DeLone–McLean Information System Success Model Revisited: The Separation of Intention to Use - Use and the Integration of Technology Acceptance Models. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(1), 172-182. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bharathi, M., & Mathiraj, S. (2020). GROWTH OF E- FILING OF TAX RETURNS IN INDIA, 7(28), 81-84. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lukman, H., & Trisnawati, E. (2019). Influence of E-Filing Websites Toward Intention of Personal Taxpayers in Submitting Annual Tax Return. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 439. [Google Scholar]
  12. DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (1992). Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. 3(1), 60-95. [Google Scholar]
  13. Javanmard, H., Nezamabadi, E., & Taheri, D. (2010). Information technology application in tax return declaration and its effect on service quality and customer satisfaction in Markazi province’s taxation organization, Iran. 2010 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology, pp. 527-530. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bernroider, E. (2008). IT governance for enterprise resource planning supported by the DeLone– McLean model of information systems success. 45(5), 257-269. [Google Scholar]
  15. DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2014). Measuring e- Commerce Success: Applying the DeLone & McLean Information Systems Success Model, 31- 47. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wu, J., & Wang, Y. (2006). Measuring KMS success A respecification of the DeLone and McLean’s model. 43(6), 728-739. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lin, H. (2007). Measuring Online Learning Systems Success: Applying the Updated DeLone and McLean Model. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 10(6). [Google Scholar]
  18. Floropoulos, J., Spathis, C., Halvatzis, D., & Tsipouridou, M. (2010). Measuring the success of the Greek Taxation Information System. 30(1), 47– 56. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang, Y. (2003). The adoption of electronic tax filing systems: an empirical study. 20(4), 333-352. [Google Scholar]
  20. Prawati, L., & Dewi, M. (2018). The Analysis of Factors Which Affect Corporate Taxpayer’s Interest Using e-Filing System, 26, 279-288. [Google Scholar]
  21. DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2014). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. [Google Scholar]
  22. Prawati, L., & Britania, H. (2020). The Impact of Information Technology on Taxation: Corporate Taxpayers’ Interest in Using DJP Online System. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt / Egyptology, 17(7), 2451-2462. [Google Scholar]
  23. Aldholay, A., Isaac, O., Abdullah, Z., & Ramayah, T. (2018). The role of transformational leadership as a mediating variable in DeLone and McLean information system success model: The context of online learning usage in Yemen. 35(5), 1421-1437. [Google Scholar]
  24. Chiang, B., & Limato, J. (2017). The Use of Technology in Tax Preparation: A Closer Examination of Electronic Filing and Filing Errors, 28(3), 47-60. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tan, C., Pan, S., & Lim, E. (2005). Towards the Restoration of Public Trust in Electronic Governments: A Case Study of the E-Filing System in Singapore. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 126c-126c. [Google Scholar]
  26. Prawati, L., Endriarto, W., Carolina, A., Prabowo, I., Tiong, K., & Sabrina, S. (2019). Transformation of Tax Information System: Implementation of Financial Information Access (ASIK) and Procedures of Taxpayers Confiscation Assets in Indonesia. International Conference on Information Management and Technology, pp. 587-591. [Google Scholar]
  27. Tam, C., & Oliveira, T. (2016). Understanding the impact of m-banking on individual performance: DeLone & McLean and TTF perspective. 61, 233-244. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bhuasiri, W., Zo, H., Lee, H., & Ciganek, A. (2016). User Acceptance of e-government Services: Examining an e-tax Filing and Payment System in Thailand. Information Technology for Development, 22(4), 672-695. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Iivari, J., & Ervasti, I. (1994). User information satisfaction: IS implementability and effectiveness. 27(4), 205-220. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.