EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 426 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 426 (2023) 02015 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 426, 2023
The 5th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2023)
Article Number 02015
Number of page(s) 9
Section Innovative Management and Sustainable Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342602015
Published online 15 September 2023
  1. Z. Surak, “The continuous improvement leader : Engaging people for a digital age,” McKinsey Co., pp. 4–9, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  2. L. Omarova and S. J. Jo, “Employee Pro- Environmental Behavior: The Impact of Environmental Transformational Leadership and GHRM,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14042046. [Google Scholar]
  3. Z. Li, J. Xue, R. Li, H. Chen, and T. Wang, “Environmentally Specific Transformational Leadership and Employee’s Pro-environmental Behavior: The Mediating Roles of Environmental Passion and Autonomous Motivation,” Front. Psychol., vol. 11, no. June 2020, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01408. [Google Scholar]
  4. G. C. Avery and H. Bergsteiner, “Sustainable leadership practices for enhancing business resilience and performance,” Strateg. Leadersh., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 5–15, 2011, doi: 10.1108/10878571111128766. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. D. Murray and S. Chua, “What is leadership?,” McKinsey Co., no. August, pp. 9–18, 2022, doi: 10.1108/eb054292. [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Nelson and T. Blog, “Leadership vs . Management,” 2011. [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Bahmani, P. Farmanesh, and A. H. Khademolomoom, “Effects of Green Human Resource Management on Innovation Performance through Green Innovation: Evidence from Northern Cyprus on Small Island Universities,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 5, p. 4158, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15054158. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. P. Hallinger and S. Suriyankietkaew, “Science Mapping of the Knowledge Base on Sustainable Leadership, 1990-2018,” Sustain., vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1–22, 2018, doi: 10.3390/su10124846. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. L. G. J. McMillan and N. D.-G. McMillan, “Conceptualising Sustainable Leadership,” Ind. Commer. Train., vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 1–40, 2017, doi: 10.1108/00197858199500005. [Google Scholar]
  10. J. T. McCann and R. A. Holt, “Defining sustainable leadership,” Int. J. Sustain. Strateg. Manag., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 204, 2010, doi: 10.1504/ijssm.2010.032561. [Google Scholar]
  11. L. W. Fry and E. Egel, “Global leadership for sustainability,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1–27, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13116360. [Google Scholar]
  12. T. Kuhlman and J. Farrington, “What is sustainability?,” Sustainability, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 3436–3448, 2010, doi: 10.3390/su2113436. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Bendell, N. Sutherland, and R. Little, “Beyond unsustainable leadership: critical social theory for sustainable leadership,” Sustain. Accounting, Manag. Policy J., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 418–444, 2017, doi: 10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2016-0048. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. A. D’amato and N. Roome, “Leadership of organizational change toward an integrated model of leadership for corporate responsibility and sustainable development: A process model of corporate responsibility beyond management innovation,” Corp. Gov., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 421– 434, 2009, doi: 10.1108/14720700910984972. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Samul, “Spiritual leadership: Meaning in the sustainableworkplace,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12010267. [Google Scholar]
  16. R. J. Astuti and S. P. Haryani, “Workplace Spirituality as Mediation of Spiritual Leadership to Affective Commitment,” Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Sustain. Innov. 2020-Accounting Manag. (ICoSIAMS 2020), vol. 176, no. ICoSIAMS 2020, pp. 72–77, 2021, doi: 10.2991/aer.k.210121.011. [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Uyar, “Spiritual Leadership,” J. Healthc. Manag. Leadersh., no. 1, pp. 22–26, 2019, doi: 10.35345/johmal.529712. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. L. W. Fry and M. P. Cohen, “Spiritual leadership as a paradigm for organizational transformation and recovery from extended work hours cultures,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 84, no. SUPPL. 2, pp. 265–278, 2009, doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9695-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. L. W. (Jody) Fry, “Handbook of Workplace Spirituality and Organizational PerformanceHandbook of Workplace Spirituality and Organizational Performance Edited by Giacalone R. A. and Jurkiewicz C. L. (Eds.). New York: M. E. Sharp, 2003. 524 pages, hard copy, $99.95,” Acad. Manag. Perspect., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 165–166, 2004, doi: 10.5465/ame.2004.14776208. [Google Scholar]
  20. H. Ali, “Sustainable Careers under Spiritual Leadership and Workplace Spirituality : A Subordinates ’ Perspective during Covid 19,” Rev. Appl. Manag. Soc. Sci., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 89–103, 2023, doi: 10.47067/ramss.v6i1.286. [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Jiang, Z. Ye, J. Liu, W. U. H. Shah, and Z. Shafait, “From ‘doing alone’ to ‘working together’—Research on the influence of spiritual leadership on employee morale,” Front. Psychol., vol. 14, no. March, pp. 1–11, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.992910. [Google Scholar]
  22. C. Barclay, D., Thompson, R., dan Higgins, “The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use an Illustration,” Technol. Stud., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 285–309, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  23. W. J. Boone, M. S. Yale, and J. R. Staver, Rasch analysis in the human sciences. 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4. [Google Scholar]
  24. B. Sumintono, Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Ilmu- Ilmu Sosial, November 2. Trim Komunikata, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Sarstedt, C. M. Ringle, and J. F. Hair, Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-2. [Google Scholar]
  26. I. Ghozali, Partial Least Squares Menggunakan Program SmartPLS 3.2.9. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2021. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.