EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 426 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 426 (2023) 02017 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 426, 2023
The 5th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2023)
Article Number 02017
Number of page(s) 11
Section Innovative Management and Sustainable Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342602017
Published online 15 September 2023
  1. P. Van Beurden and T. Gössling, “The worth of values–a literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance,” Journal of business ethics, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 407– 424, 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Grewal and G. Serafeim, “Research on corporate sustainability: Review and directions for future research,” Foundations and Trends in Accounting, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 73–127, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. D. J. Wood, “Corporate social performance revisited,” Academy of management review, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 691–718, 1991. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Waddock, “Creating corporate accountability: Foundational principles to make corporate citizenship real,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 313–327, 2004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Amel-Zadeh and G. Serafeim, “Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey,” Financial Analysts Journal, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 87–103, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. B. Cheng, I. Ioannou, and G. Serafeim, “Corporate social responsibility and access to finance,” Strategic management journal, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Buallay, “Is sustainability reporting (ESG) associated with performance? Evidence from the European banking sector,” MEQ, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 98–115, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1108/MEQ-12- 2017-0149. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. D. S. Dhaliwal, O. Z. Li, A. Tsang, and Y. G. Yang, “Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting,” The accounting review, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 59–100, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. C. A. Hennessy and T. M. Whited, “How costly is external financing? Evidence from a structural estimation,” The Journal of Finance, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 1705–1745, 2007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. E. P. Yu, C. Q. Guo, and B. V. Luu, “Environmental, social and governance transparency and firm value,” Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 987–1004, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. M. Fatemi and I. J. Fooladi, “Sustainable finance: A new paradigm,” Global Finance Journal, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 101–113, 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. M. E. Porter and M. R. Kramer, “The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility,” Harvard business review, vol. 84, no. 12, pp. 78–92, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Velte, “Does ESG performance have an impact on financial performance? Evidence from Germany,” Journal of Global Responsibility, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  14. B.-H. Yoon, J.-H. Lee, and J.-H. Cho, “The Effect of ESG Performance on Tax Avoidance— Evidence from Korea,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 12, p. 6729, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Y. Do and S. Kim, “Do higher-rated or enhancing ESG of firms enhance their long–term sustainability? Evidence from market returns in Korea,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 7, p. 2664, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. G.-Y. Jang, H.-G. Kang, J.-Y. Lee, and K. Bae, “ESG scores and the credit market,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 8, p. 3456, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. J.-S. Baek, J.-K. Kang, and K. S. Park, “Corporate governance and firm value: Evidence from the Korean financial crisis,” Journal of Financial economics, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 265–313, 2004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. P. Gupta and A. M. Sharma, “A study of the impact of corporate governance practices on firm performance in Indian and South Korean companies,” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 133, pp. 4–11, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Pae and T. H. Choi, “Corporate governance, commitment to business ethics, and firm valuation: Evidence from the Korean stock market,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 323–348, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. T. Rowley and S. Berman, “A brand new brand of corporate social performance,” Business & society, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 397–418, 2000. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. H. Liang and L. Renneboog, “On the foundations of corporate social responsibility,” The Journal of Finance, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 853–910, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. L. Pastor and P. Veronesi, “Uncertainty about government policy and stock prices,” The journal of Finance, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 1219–1264, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. T. L. Campbell II and P. Y. Keys, “Corporate governance in South Korea: the chaebol experience,” Journal of corporate Finance, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 373–391, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Gutsche, J.-F. Schulz, and M. Gratwohl, “Firm- value effects of CSR disclosure and CSR performance,” 2017, pp. 1–31. [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Friedman, Capitalism and freedom: With the assistance of Rose D. Friedman. University of Chicago Press, 1962. [Google Scholar]
  26. K. E. Aupperle, A. B. Carroll, and J. D. Hatfield, “An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability,” Academy of management Journal, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 446–463, 1985. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. B. W. Jacobs, V. R. Singhal, and R. Subramanian, “An empirical investigation of environmental performance and the market value of the firm,” Journal of Operations Management, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 430–441, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. G. Friede, T. Busch, and A. Bassen, “ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies,” Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 210–233, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. M. Steyn, “Organisational benefits and implementation challenges of mandatory integrated reporting,” Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  30. M. Khan, G. Serafeim, and A. Yoon, “Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality,” The accounting review, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 1697–1724, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. N. A. Gardberg and C. J. Fombrun, “Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments,” Academy of management Review, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 329–346, 2006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. S. Kim and Z. F. Li, “Understanding the Impact of ESG Practices in Corporate Finance,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 7, p. 3746, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. R. Atan, M. M. Alam, J. Said, and M. Zamri, “The impacts of environmental, social, and governance factors on firm performance: Panel study of Malaysian companies,” Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  34. M. A. Harjoto and Y. Wang, “Board of directors network centrality and environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance,” Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  35. J. J. Choi, S. W. Park, and S. S. Yoo, “The value of outside directors: Evidence from corporate governance reform in Korea,” Journal of financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 941– 962, 2007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. S. Claessens, S. Djankov, J. P. Fan, and L. H. Lang, “Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings,” The journal of finance, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 2741–2771, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. G. Birindelli, S. Dell’Atti, A. P. Iannuzzi, and M. Savioli, “Composition and activity of the board of directors: Impact on ESG performance in the banking system,” Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 12, p. 4699, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. N. Chams and J. García-Blandón, “Sustainable or not sustainable? The role of the board of directors,” Journal of cleaner production, vol. 226, pp. 1067–1081, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. C. Post, N. Rahman, and E. Rubow, “Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility,” Business & society, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 189–223, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Orij, R, “Corporate social disclosures in the context of national cultures and stakeholder theory”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 23 No. 7, pp. 868-889, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. C. Bart and G. McQueen, “Why women make better directors,” International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 93–99, 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. B. R. Baliga, R. C. Moyer, and R. S. Rao, “CEO duality and firm performance: What’s the fuss?,” Strategic management journal, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 41–53, 1996. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. J. L. Fizel and K. K. Louie, “CEO retention, firm performance and corporate governance,” Managerial and Decision Economics, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 167–176, 1990. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. M. Romano, A. Cirillo, C. Favino, and A. Netti, “ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) Performance and Board Gender Diversity: The Moderating Role of CEO Duality,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 21, p. 9298, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. D. Ramdani and A. van Witteloostuijn, “The impact of board independence and CEO duality on firm performance: A quantile regression analysis for Indonesia, Malaysia, South Korea and Thailand,” British Journal of Management, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 607–627, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. K. Ahmed, M. Hossain, and M. B. Adams, “The effects of board composition and board size on the informativeness of annual accounting earnings,” Corporate governance: an international review, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 418–431, 2006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. R. B. Adams, B. E. Hermalin, and M. S. Weisbach, “The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey,” Journal of economic literature, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 58–107, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. I. Laksmana, “Corporate board governance and voluntary disclosure of executive compensation practices,” Contemporary accounting research, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1147–1182, 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. S. Mooij, “The ESG rating and ranking industry; Vice or virtue in the adoption of responsible investment?” Vice or Virtue in the Adoption of Responsible Investment, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  50. B. Yoon, J.-H. Lee, and J.-H. Cho, “The Effect of ESG Performance on Tax Avoidance—Evidence from Korea,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 12, p. 6729, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13126729. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. R. G. Eccles and J. C. Stroehle, “Exploring social origins in the construction of ESG measures,” Available at SSRN 3212685, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  52. D. Haruna, L. M. Kwambo, and S. U. Hassan, “Board characteristics and earnings quality of listed conglomerate firms in Nigeria,” Scholedge International Journal of Business Policy & Governance, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 14–37, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  53. Y. Youm and J. J. Griffin, “CSR programs in South Korean firms: The influence of Chaebols and CEOs,” 2016, vol. 2016, no. 1, p. 15056. [Google Scholar]
  54. M. Arayssi, M. Jizi, and H. H. Tabaja, “The impact of board composition on the level of ESG disclosures in GCC countries,” Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  55. B. W. Husted and J. M. de Sousa-Filho, “Board structure and environmental, social, and governance disclosure in Latin America,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 102, pp. 220–227, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. M. Ararat, S. Claessens, and B. B. Yurtoglu, “Corporate governance in emerging markets: A selective review and an agenda for future research,” Emerging Markets Review, vol. 48, p. 100767, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. R. Manita, M. G. Bruna, R. Dang, and L. Houanti, “Board gender diversity and ESG disclosure: evidence from the USA,” Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  58. A. M. Ismail and I. H. M. Latiff, “Board diversity and corporate sustainability practices: Evidence on environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting,” International Journal of Financial Research, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 31–50, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. M. Tsoutsoura, “Corporate social responsibility and financial performance,” 2004. [Google Scholar]
  60. W. Lu, K. Chau, H. Wang, and W. Pan, “A decade’s debate on the nexus between corporate social and corporate financial performance: a critical review of empirical studies 2002–2011,” Journal of cleaner production, vol. 79, pp. 195– 206, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. M. L. Andersen and J. S. Dejoy, “Corporate social and financial performance: the role of size, industry, risk, R&D and advertising expenses as control variables,” Business and Society Review, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 237–256, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. A. Aouadi and S. Marsat, “Do ESG controversies matter for firm value? Evidence from international data,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 151, no. 4, pp. 1027–1047, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. S. Drempetic, C. Klein, and B. Zwergel, “The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review,” J Bus Ethics, vol. 167, no. 2, pp. 333–360, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. J.-M. Sahut and H. Pasquini-Descomps, “ESG impact on market performance of firms: International Evidence,” Management International/International Management/Gestiòn Internacional, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 40–63, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  65. J. Tsui and F. A. Gul, “Corporate governance and financial transparencies in the Hong Kong-special administrative region of The People’s Republic of China,” presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd Asian Roundtable on Corporate Governance, Retrieved on March 25, 2004, from: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/57/58/33919929.pdf, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  66. M. Harjoto, I. Laksmana, and R. Lee, “Board diversity and corporate social responsibility,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 641–660, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  67. M. C. Branco and L. L. Rodrigues, “Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives,” Journal of business Ethics, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 111–132, 2006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  68. P. Fahad and S. A. Busru, “CSR disclosure and firm performance: evidence from an emerging market,” Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  69. E. Duque-Grisales and J. Aguilera-Caracuel, “Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of multilatinas: Moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack,” Journal of Business Ethics, pp. 1–20, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  70. P. Budsaratragoon and B. Jitmaneeroj, “Corporate Sustainability and Stock Value in Asian–Pacific Emerging Markets: Synergies or Tradeoffs among ESG Factors?,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 11, p. 6458, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  71. P. De Andres and E. Vallelado, “Corporate governance in banking: The role of the board of directors,” Journal of banking & finance, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 2570–2580, 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  72. K. Rao and C. Tilt, “Board composition and corporate social responsibility: The role of diversity, gender, strategy and decision making,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 327–347, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  73. A. Y. Al Hawaj and A. M. Buallay, “A worldwide sectorial analysis of sustainability reporting and its impact on firm performance,” Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, pp. 1–25, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  74. T. Khanna and K. Palepu, “Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups,” The journal of finance, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 867–891, 2000. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.