EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 426 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 426 (2023) 02103 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 426, 2023
The 5th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2023)
Article Number 02103
Number of page(s) 9
Section Innovative Management and Sustainable Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342602103
Published online 15 September 2023
  1. Al-Musali, M. A., & Ku Ismail, K. N. I. (2016). Cross-country comparison of intellectual capital performance and its impact on financial performance of commercial banks in GCC countries. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 9(4), 512–531. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-03-2015-0029 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amalia, S., & Nugraha, N. M. (2021). The Impact of Financial Ratio Indicators on Banking Profitability in Indonesia. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(8), 580–588. [Google Scholar]
  3. Assensoh-Kodua, A. (2019). The resource-based view: A tool of key competency for competitive advantage. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(3), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(3).2019.12 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Benitez, J., Henseler, J., Castillo, A., & Schuberth, F. (2020). How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least squares: Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research. Information & Management, 57(2), 103168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.05.003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bhatti, W. A., & Zaheer, A. (2014). The Role of Intellectual Capital in Creating and Adding Value to Organizational Performance: A Conceptual Analysis. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management Volume, 12(3), 187–194. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen Goh, P. (2005). Intellectual capital performance of commercial banks in Malaysia. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(3), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930510611120 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, M. C., Cheng, S. J., & Hwang, Y. (2005). An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital and firms’ market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930510592771 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dietrich, A., & Wanzenried, G. (2011). Determinants of bank profitability before and during the crisis: Evidence from Switzerland. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 21(3), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2011.02.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ikapel, O. F. (2016). Analysis Of Intellectual Capital And Financial Performance Of Commercial Banks In Kenya: An Application Of Value Added Intellectual Coefficient (Vaictm). [Google Scholar]
  11. Joshi, M., Cahill, D., Sidhu, J., & Kansal, M. (2013). Intellectual capital and financial performance: an evaluation of the Australian financial sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(2), 264–285. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931311323887 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101 [Google Scholar]
  13. Kock, N., & Lynn, G. S. (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7), 546– 580. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00302 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kubo, I., & Saka, A. (2002). An inquiry into the motivations of knowledge workers in the Japanese financial industry. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(3), 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270210434368 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Meles, A., Porzio, C., Sampagnaro, G., & Verdoliva, V. (2016). The impact of the intellectual capital efficiency on commercial banks performance: Evidence from the US. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 36, 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2016.04.003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mensah Onumah, J., & Tornam Duho, K. C. (2019). Intellectual Capital: Its Impact on Financial Performance and Financial Stability of Ghanaian Banks. Athens Journal of Business & Economics, 5(3), 243–268. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajbe.5-3-4 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mondal, A., & Ghosh, S. K. (2012). Intellectual capital and financial performance of Indian banks. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13(4), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931211276115 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nimtrakoon, S. (2015). The relationship between intellectual capital, firms’ market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(3), 587–618. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-09-2014-0104 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ozkan, N., Cakan, S., & Kayacan, M. (2017). Intellectual capital and financial performance: A study of the Turkish Banking Sector. Borsa Istanbul Review, 17(3), 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2016.03.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pasiouras, F., & Kosmidou, K. (2007). Factors influencing the profitability of domestic and foreign commercial banks in the European Union. Research in International Business and Finance, 21(2), 222– 237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2006.02.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pulić, A. (2008). The Principles of Intellectual Capital Efficiency - A Brief Description. Croatian Intellectual Capital Center, 76, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  22. Rashid, H. A., Farooq, S., Liaqat, F., Qadeer, A., & Younas, N. (2020). Analyzing the impact of intellectual capital on financial performance of food & personal care and textile sectors: A comparative analysis. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 58(1), 35–60. [Google Scholar]
  23. Razak, R. A., Mohammad, J., & Sarah Mohammad, T. (2016). Intellectual Capital Disclosures Practices and Intellectual Capital Performance in Saudi Arabia Financial Institution. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 7(4), 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  24. Sardo, F., Serrasqueiro, Z., & Alves, H. (2018). On the relationship between intellectual capital and financial performance: A panel data analysis on SME hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 75, 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.03.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shih, K. H., Chang, C. J., & Lin, B. (2010). Assessing knowledge creation and intellectual capital in banking industry. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(1), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931011013343 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Smriti, N., & Das, N. (2018). The impact of intellectual capital on firm performance: a study of Indian firms listed in COSPI. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(5), 935–964. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-11-2017-0156 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Soewarno, N., & Tjahjadi, B. (2020). Measures that matter: an empirical investigation of intellectual capital and financial performance of banking firms in Indonesia. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21(6), 1085–1106. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-09-2019-0225 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Stewart, T. A. (2010). Intellectual Capital: The new wealth of organization. Currency. [Google Scholar]
  29. Tran, D. B., & Vo, D. H. (2018). Should bankers be concerned with Intellectual capital? A study of the Thai banking sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(5), 897–914. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-12-2017-0185 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 23. Semarang: BPFE Universitas Diponegoro. [Google Scholar]
  31. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2016). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan No.4/POJK.03 tentang Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.