EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 426 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 426 (2023) 02137 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 426, 2023
The 5th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2023)
Article Number 02137
Number of page(s) 10
Section Innovative Management and Sustainable Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342602137
Published online 15 September 2023
  1. Afthanorhan, A., Foziah, H., & Majid, N. A. (2020). Investigating digital library success using the DeLone and McLean information system success 2.0: The analysis of common factor based structural equation modeling. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Mamary, Y. H. S., Shamsuddin, A., Aziati, A. H. N., & Al-Maamari, M. H. (2015). Adoption of Management Information Systems in Context of Yemeni Organizations: A Struc-tural Equation Modeling Approach. Journal of Digital Information management, 13(6), 429-444. [Google Scholar]
  3. Albay, T. G. (2020). Assessing E-Filing Success: The Moderating Roles of Tax Complexity, Prior Experience, and Perceived Risk. Proceedings: Multi-dimensional Disruption in the Asia-Pacific (The 5th TU-CAPS). Thailand. [Google Scholar]
  4. Aliah, N. (2020). The role of e-filing in improving taxpayer compliance in Indonesia. Accounting and Business Journal, 2(1), 1-9. [Google Scholar]
  5. Alrajawy, I. (2017). Examine Factors Influencing the Intention to use Mobile Learning in Yemen Public Universities. Asian Journal of Information Technology, 16(2), 287-297. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ameen, A., Al-Ali, D., Isaac, O., & Mohammed, F. (2020). Examining relationship between service quality, user satisfaction, and performance impact in the context of smart government in UAE. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 10(6), 6026-6033. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Andika, K. D., & Yasa, I. N. P. (2020). Pengaruh Technology Acceptance Model terhadap penggunaan eFiling. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Humanika, 10(3), 267-275. [Google Scholar]
  8. Azmi, A. A. C., & Bee, N. L. (2010). The acceptance of the e-filing system by Malaysian Taxpayers: A simplified model. Electronic Journal of e-Government , 8(1), 13-22. [Google Scholar]
  9. Azmi, A. A. C., & Kamarulzaman, Y. (2010). Adoption of tax e-filing: A conceptual paper. African Journal of Business Management, 4(5), 599-603. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bandiyono, A. H. (2020). Service E-filing and E-biling to increase tax compliance and acceptance. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management And Social Science, 1(2), 208-223. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Basu, S. (2004). E-Government and Developing Countries:. International Review of Law Computers & Technology, 18(1), 109-132. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chang, I-C., Chang, L-C, Hung, W-F., & Hwang, H-G. (2005). An empirical study on the impact of quality antecedents on tax payers’ acceptance of Internet tax-filing systems. Government Information Quarterly, 22(3), 389-410. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chaouali, W., Yahia, I. B., Charfeddine, L., & Triki, A. (2016). Understanding citizens’ adoption of e-filing in developing countries: An empirical investigation. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 27(2), 161-176. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen, C. W. (2010). Impact of quality antecedents on taxpayer satisfaction with online tax-filing systems—An empirical study. Information & Management, 47(5-6), 308-315. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen, J. V., Jubilado, R. J., Capistrano, E. P., & Yen, D. C. (2015). Factors affecting online tax filing – An application of the IS Success Model and trust theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 251-262. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chin, W. W. (1988). The Partial Least Squares approach to Structural Equation Modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 294-326. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chinn, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modelling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7-16. [Google Scholar]
  18. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
  19. Davis, F. D. (1986). A Technology Acceptance Model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [Google Scholar]
  20. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Devi, S. N. Warasniasih, N. S. M., Masdiantini, P. R., & Musmini, L. S. (2020). The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Financial Performance of Firms on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 23(2), 226-242. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dewi, L. D. (2018). The analysis of factors which affect corporate taxpayer’s interest using E-filing system. Pertanika Journals, 26(T), 279-288. [Google Scholar]
  24. Farizi, M. A. (2020). Evaluation of the success of the vehicle administration system and online tax (Sakpole) with model DeLone and McLean. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 10(1), 127-135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Franque, F. B., Oliveira, T., & Tam, C. (2021). Understanding the factors of mobile payment continuance intention: Empirical test in an African context, Heliyon, 7(8). [Google Scholar]
  27. Gunaasih, S. A. (2021). The Performance of Service, System, and Technology of E-filing Product on the Enthusiasm of People at Police Science College in Jakarta. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 10(2). [Google Scholar]
  28. Hair, Jr. J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) (2nd Ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hambali, A. J. (2020a). The success of E-filing adoption during COVID 19 pandemic: The role of collaborative quality, user intention, and user satisfaction. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 23(1), 57-68. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hambali, A. J. (2020b). The success of e-filing adoption during COVID 19 pandemic. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 23(1), 57-68. [Google Scholar]
  32. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hussain, S. F. (2018). Structural equation model for evaluating factors affecting quality of social infrastructure projects. Sustainability, 10, 1-25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hussein, R. M. (2011). E-government application: An integrated model on G2C adoption of online tax. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 5(3), 225-248. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Islam, M. A., Yusuf, D. H. M., Yusoff, W. S., & Johari, A. N. B. (2012). Factors affecting user satisfaction in the Malaysian income tax e-filing system. African Journal of Business Managemen, 6(21), 6447-6455. [Google Scholar]
  36. Jaafreh, A. B. (2017). Evaluation of information system success: Applying the DeLone and McLean information system success model in the context banking system at KSA. International Review of Management and Business Research, 6(2). [Google Scholar]
  37. Jannah, S. M. (2020, March 15). Kantor pajak se-Indonesia tutup sementara akibat Corona. Tirto.id. https://tirto.id/kantor-pajak-se-indonesia-tutup-sementara-akibat-corona-eFga [Google Scholar]
  38. Kamarulzaman, Y., & Azmi, A. A. C. (2010). Tax E-filing adoption in Malaysia: A conceptual model. Journal of E-Government Studies and Best Practices. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lie, I. (2013). Factors that influence Taxpayer Behavior Interest in Using e-filing. Tax & Accounting Review, 3(2), 1-15. [Google Scholar]
  40. Masunga, F. J., Mapesa, H. J., & Nyalle, M. A. (2020). Quality of E-Tax System and Its Effect on Tax Compliance (Evidence From Large Taxpayers in Tanzania). International Journal of Commerce and Finance, 6(2), 145-158. [Google Scholar]
  41. Millenia, S., Kristianti, T., & Prawati, L. D. (2022). The success factors of e-filing tax reporting in Indonesia: An empirical analysis using the DeLone & McLean IS success model. ICCMB 2022: 2022 5th International Conference on Computers in Management and Business (ICCMB), 90-97. [Google Scholar]
  42. Napitupulu, D. (2017). A conceptual model of E-government adoption in Indonesia. Advanced Science Engineering Information Technology, 7(4), 1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Novindra, N. P. (2017). The influence of ease of use, perceived use, and computer self efficacy on interest in using E-SPT. E-Journal of Accounting, 19(2), 1116-1143. [Google Scholar]
  44. Parasuraman, A. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and it’s implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41-50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Pramanita, I. G. A. A. N. G., & Rasmini, N. K. (2020). Sistem e-filing dan kepatuhan wajib pajak orang pribadi: Studi D&M IS success model pada KPP Pratama Denpasar Timur. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 30(11), 2825-2838. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Prawati, L. D., Setyawan, M. H., & Elsera, M. (2020). The Effect of Tax Rate, E-Billing Payment. International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech), 715-719. [Google Scholar]
  47. Surendran, P. (2012). Technology Acceptance Model: A survey of literature. International Journal of Business and Social Research (IJBSR), 2(4), 175-178. [Google Scholar]
  48. Rahman, D. S. (2015). The Effect Of Innovation Attributes and Taxpayer’s Experience On The Interest Of The Use Of Online Tax Filling System On Individual Tax Payers In Surabaya. The Indonesian Accounting Review, 5(1), 77-86. [Google Scholar]
  49. Rakhmawati, H. S. (2020). Influence of TAM and UTAUT models of the use of e-filing on tax compliance. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 9(1), 106-111. [Google Scholar]
  50. Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Williams, M. D., & Weerakkody, V. (2015). Investigating success of an E-government initiative: Validation of an integrated IS success model. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(1), 127-142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Shahzad, A., Hassan, R., Aremu, A. Y., Hussain, A., & Lodhi, R. N. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 in E-learning on higher education institution students: the group comparison between male and female. Quality & Quantity, 55(3), 805-826. [Google Scholar]
  52. Shim, M., & Jo, H. S. (2020). What quality factors matter in enhancing the perceived benefits of online health information sites? Application of the updated DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 137. [Google Scholar]
  53. Sijabat, R. (2020). Analysis of e-government services:. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 23(3), 179-197. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Taherdoost, H. (2018). A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia Manufacturing, 22, 960-967. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Tam, C. O. (2016). Understanding the impact of m-banking on individual performance: DeLone & McLean and TTF perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 233-244. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Tam, C., & Oliveira, T. (2016). Understanding the impact of m-banking on individual performance: DeLone & McLean and TTF perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 233-244. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. Tjen, C., Indriani, V., & Wicaksono, P. T. (2019). Prior Experience, Trust, and IS Success Model: A Study on the Use of Tax e-Filing in Indonesia. Journal of the Australasian Tax Teachers Association, 14(1). [Google Scholar]
  58. Veeramootoo, N. N. (2018). What determines success of an e-government service? Validation of an integrative model of e-filing continuance usage. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 1-14. [Google Scholar]
  59. Veeramootoo, N., Nunkoo, R., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018). What determines success of an e-government service? Validation of an integrative model of e-filing continuance usage. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 161-174. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2009). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425-478. [Google Scholar]
  61. Wangpipatwong, S., Chutimaskul, W., & Papasratorn, B. (2005). Factors influencing the adoption of Thai eGovernment websites: Information quality and system quality approach. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on eBusiness, (pp. 19-20). Bangkok. [Google Scholar]
  62. Weerakkody, V., El-Haddadeh, R., Al-Sobhi, F., Shareef, M. A., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2013). Examining the influence of intermediaries in facilitating e-government adoption: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Information Management, 33, 716-725. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. Widyari, N. Y. A., Ariyanto, D., Suprasto, H. B., & Suputra, I, D, G. D. (2021). Understanding the impact of e-filing system performance on tax compliance using the DeLone and McLean Model. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 8(2), 161-180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. Zaidi, S. K. (2017). The moderating effect of culture on e-filing taxes: Evidence from India. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 7(1), 134-152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.