EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 427 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 427 (2023) 01013 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 427, 2023
International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering and Energetic-Iraq (ICGEE 2023)
Article Number 01013
Number of page(s) 8
Section Development in Geotechnical Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342701013
Published online 13 September 2023
  1. Sharma N.K., Swain S.K., Sahoo U.C. Stabilization of a clayey soil with fly ash and lime: a micro level investigation. Geotechnical and geological engineering. 2012 Oct;30(1):1197–1205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alrubaye A.J., Hasan M., Fattah M.Y. Engineering properties of clayey soil stabilized with lime. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 2016 Feb;11(4):2434–2441. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chian S.C., Nguyen S.T., Phoon K.K. Extended strength development model of cement-treated clay. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 2016 Feb 1;142(2):06015014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arulrajah A., Yaghoubi M., Disfani M.M., Horpibulsuk S., Bo M.W., Leong M. Evaluation of fly ash-and slag- based geopolymers for the improvement of a soft marine clay by deep soil mixing. Soils and foundations. 2018 Dec 1;58(6):1358–1370. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Yaghoubi M., Arulrajah A., Disfani M.M., Horpibulsuk S., Darmawan S., Wang J. Impact of field conditions on the strength development of a geopolymer stabilized marine clay. Applied Clay Science. 2019 Jan 1;167(1):33–42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barcelo L., Kline J., Walenta G., Gartner E. Cement and carbon emissions. Materials and structures. 2014 Jun;47(6):1055–1065. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Amer A.A., El-Hoseny S. Properties and performance of metakaolin pozzolanic cement pastes. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2017 Jul;129(1):33–44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Yu J., Chen Y., Chen G., Wang L. Experimental study of the feasibility of using anhydrous sodium metasilicate as a geopolymer activator for soil stabilization. Engineering Geology. 2020 Jan 1;264:105316. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu G., Zhang C., Zhao M., Guo W., Luo Q. Comparison of nanomaterials with other unconventional materials used as additives for soil improvement in the context of sustainable development: a review. Nanomaterials. 2020 Dec 23;11(1):15. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Li W., Yi Y. Stabilization/solidification of lead-and zinc-contaminated soils using MgO and CO2. Journal of CO2 Utilization. 2019 Oct 1;33(1):215–221. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Firoozi A.A., Naji M., Dithinde M., Firoozi A.A. A review: influence of potential nanomaterials for civil engineering projects. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering. 2021 Dec 1:1–2. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cao G. Nanostructures & nanomaterials: synthesis, properties & applications. Imperial College Press; 2004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Huang Y., Wang L. Experimental studies on nanomaterials for soil improvement: a review. Environmental Earth Sciences. 2016 Mar; 75(1). [Google Scholar]
  14. Gao L., Luo Y., Ren Z., Yu X., Wu K. Experimental study on dynamic properties of nano-MgO-modified silty clay. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering. 2020 Jun;6(1):1–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gao L., Ren Z., Yu X. Experimental study of nanometer magnesium oxide-modified clay. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. 2015 Sep;52(4):18–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Taha M.R., Jawad I.T., Majeed Z.H. Treatment of soft soil with nano-magnesium oxide. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Nanotechnology in Construction, Chicago, I.L., USA. 2015 May; 24–26. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gao L., Ren K.Y., Ren Z., Yu X.J. Study on the shear property of nano-MgO-modified soil. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology. 2018 May 19;36(4):465–470. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ahmadi H., Janati S., Jamshidi Chenari R. Strength parameters of stabilized clay using polypropylene fibers and nano-MgO: An experimental study. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. 2020 Jun;38(1):45–58. [Google Scholar]
  19. Salem L.A., Taher A.H., Mosa A.M., Banyhussan Q.S. Chemical influence of nano-magnesium-oxide on properties of soft subgrade soil. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences. 2020 Apr 8;8(1):533–541. [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen S., Hou X., Luo T., Yu Y., Jin L. Effects of MgO nanoparticles on dynamic shear modulus of loess subjected to freeze-thaw cycles. Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 2022 May 1;18:5019–5031. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mir B.A. Manual of geotechnical laboratory soil testing. CRC Press; 2021 Oct [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Taha M.R., Taha O.M. Influence of nanomaterial on the expansive and shrinkage soil behavior. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2012 Oct;14:1–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wang D., Wang H., Wang X. Compressibility and strength behavior of marine soils solidified with MgO-A green and low carbon binder. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology. 2017 Aug 18;35(6):878–886 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Al-Gharbawi A.S., Fattah M.Y., Mahmood M.R. Effect of magnesium oxide and carbonation on collapse potential of collapsible gypseous soil. GEOMATE Journal. 2022 Apr 2;22(92):48–55. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bahmani S.H., Huat B.B., Asadi A., Farzadnia N. Stabilization of residual soil using SiO2 nanoparticles and cement. Construction and Building Materials. 2014 Aug 14;64:350–359. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Yao K., Wang W., Li N., Zhang C., Wang L. Investigation on strength and microstructure characteristics of nano-MgO admixed with cemented soft soil. Construction and Building Materials. 2019 May 10;206:160–168. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lang L., Chen B., Duan H. Modification of nanoparticles for the strength enhancing of cement- stabilized dredged sludge. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 2021 Jun 1;13(3):694–704. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.