Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 429, 2023
The Third International Conference of Construction, Infrastructure, and Materials (ICCIM 2023)
Article Number 05012
Number of page(s) 6
Section Structural Engineering and Materials
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342905012
Published online 20 September 2023
  1. N. Anand, D.P. Thanaraj, D. Andrushia, É.E. Lublóy, T. Kiran, B. Kanagaraj, V. Kodur, J Therm Anal Calorim 148, 3221–3247 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-023-11998-5 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. M.A. Ismael, Y.M. Hameed, International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics 18(1), 97-105 (2023) https://doi.org/10.18280/ijdne.180111 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. D.L. Peña, C. Ibáñez, V. Albero, A. Hospitaler, Fire Technol (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-023-01401-y [Google Scholar]
  4. T-C. Wang, W-Y. Gao, W-W. Liu, J. Liang, J. Yang, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 283, 109213 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109213 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Y. Han, Y-H. Bao, Sci Rep 13, 1322 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28517-z [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Anderberg, Different methods to investigate and to repair the damages of a post-tensioned deck of a high-way bridge after a fire incident due to a traffic accident, in 2nd International Conference on Concrete Repair, Rehabilitation and Retrofitting, ICCRRR-2, 24-26 Nov, Cape Town, South Africa (2008) [Google Scholar]
  7. M.A.N. Moura, A.L. Moreno, G.C.S. Ferreira, Construction and Building Materials 373, 130887 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130887 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. I. Venanzi, A.L. Materazzi, M. Zappia, Assessment of fire-damaged concrete structures and the corresponding measures, in 2nd International Conference on Concrete Repair, Rehabilitation and Retrofitting, ICCRRR-2, 24-26 Nov, Cape Town, South Africa (2008) [Google Scholar]
  9. I. Ioannou, T. Rossetto, D. Rush, J. Melo, Sci Rep 12, 8980 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13188-z [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zaidir, S. Wardi, GEOMATE Journal 24(106), 85–92 (2023) https://geomatejournal.com/geomate/article/view/3890 [Google Scholar]
  11. R.O. Hamburger, C. Rojahn, J.A. Heintz, M.G. Mahoney, FEMA P58: Next-generation building seismic performance assessment methodology, in Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 15 WCEE (2012) [Google Scholar]
  12. Y.F. Vargas, L.G. Pujades, A.H. Barbat, J.E. Hurtado, Computational Methods in Applied Sciences 26, 293-308 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5134-7_17 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. L. Astriana, S. Sangadji, E. Purwanto, S.A. Kristiawan, Procedia Engineering 171, 1069-1076 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.457 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. I.R. Hapsari, S. Sangadji, S.A. Kristiawan, MATEC Web Conf. 195, 02017 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201819502017 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Sangadji, N.A. Wibowo, E.N. Tropormera, E. Purwanto, S.A. Kristiawan, MATEC Web Conf. 138, 02005 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201713802005 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  16. F. Romano, M. Faggella, R. Gigliotti, F. Braga, Seismic loss analysis of a non-ductile infilled RC building, in Proceedings of Italian Concrete Days 2016, ICD 2016, October, Rome, Italy (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78936-1_38 [Google Scholar]
  17. National Standardization Agency, Procedures for earthquake resistance planning for Indonesian building and non-building structures (SNI 1726:2019) [Google Scholar]
  18. Z.V. Milutinovic, G.S. Trendafiloski, An advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications to different European towns (RISK-UE – EVK4-CT-2000-00014) [Google Scholar]
  19. S.A. Kristiawan, I.R. Hapsari, E. Purwanto, M. Marwahyudi, Buildings 12(1), 21 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12010021 [Google Scholar]
  20. Department of Homeland Security, Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, earthquake model (Hazus–MH 2.1, 2012) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.