EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 430 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 430 (2023) 01119 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 430, 2023
15th International Conference on Materials Processing and Characterization (ICMPC 2023)
Article Number 01119
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202343001119
Published online 06 October 2023
  1. Yang, Hong, Xianhua Chen, Guangsheng Huang, Jiangfeng Song, Jia She, Jun Tan, Kaihong Zheng, Yiming Jin, Bin Jiang, and Fusheng Pan. “Microstructures and mechanical properties of titanium-reinforced magnesium matrix composites: review and perspective.” Journal of Magnesium and Alloys (2022). [Google Scholar]
  2. Xue, Gang, Linda Ke, Haihong Zhu, Hailong Liao, Junjie Zhu, and Xiaoyan Zeng. “Influence of processing parameters on selective laser melted SiCp/AlSi10Mg composites: Densification, microstructure and mechanical properties.” Materials Science and Engineering: A 764 (2019): 138155. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Weng, Fei, Huijun Yu, Chuanzhong Chen, Jianli Liu, Longjie Zhao, Jingjie Dai, and Zhihuan Zhao. “Effect of process parameters on the microstructure evolution and wear property of the laser cladding coatings on Ti-6Al-4V alloy.” Journal of alloys and compounds 692 (2017): 989-996. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang, Yanan, Liangshun Luo, Tong Liu, Binbin Wang, Lei Luo, Junhao Zhao, Liang Wang, Yanqing Su, Jingjie Guo, and Hengzhi Fu. “Tuning process parameters to optimize microstructure and mechanical properties of novel maraging steel fabricated by selective laser melting.” Materials Science and Engineering: A 823 (2021): 141740. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Vyskoč, Maroš, Miroslav Sahul, Mária Dománková, Peter Jurči, Martin Sahul, Monika Vyskočová, and Maroš Martinkovič. “The effect of process parameters on the microstructure and mechanical properties of AW5083 aluminum laser weld joints.” Metals 10, no. 11 (2020): 1443. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Vinoth, S., G. Kanimozhi, K. Hari Prasad, K. Harish, E. S. Srinadhu, and N. Satyanarayana. 2019. “Enhanced Ionic Conductivity of Electrospun Nanocomposite (PVDF-HFP+ TiO2 Nanofibers Fillers) Polymer Fibrous Membrane Electrolyte for DSSC Application.” Polymer Composites 40, no. 4: 1585-1594. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Venugopal, S., M. Seeman, R. Seetharaman, and V. Jayaseelan. “The effect of bonding process parameters on the microstructure and mechanical properties of AA5083 diffusion-bonded joints.” International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture 5, no. 4 (2022): 555-563. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Su, Yutai, Yachao Wang, and Jing Shi. “Microstructure and mechanical properties of laser DED produced crack-free Al 7075 alloy: Effect of process parameters and heat treatment.” Materials Science and Engineering: A 857 (2022): 144075. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Singh, S., V. Agrawal, K. K. SAXENA, and K. A. Mohammed. 2023. “Optimization on Manufacturing Processes at Indian Industries Using TOPSIS.” Indian Journal of Engineering and Materials Sciences (IJEMS) 30, no. 1: 32-44. [Google Scholar]
  10. Singh, B., I. Kumar, K. K. Saxena, K. A. Mohammed, M. I. Khan, S. B. Moussa, and S. S. Abdullaev. 2023. “A Future Prospects and Current Scenario of Aluminium Metal Matrix Composites Characteristics.” Alexandria Engineering Journal 76: 1-17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sarkhel, P., M. K. Dikshit, V. K. Pathak, K. K. Saxena, C. Prakash, and D. Buddhi. 2023. “Robust Deflection Control and Analysis of a Fishing Rod-type Flexible Robotic Manipulator for Collaborative Robotics.” Robotics and Autonomous Systems 159: 104293. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sambasivam, S., A. S. Abed, S. Chopde, P. P. Patil, P. Math, A. Parmar, et al. 2023. “Role of Processing Techniques Related to Mg-MMCs for Biomedical Implantation: An Overview.” Materials Today: Proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  13. Raj, I. L. P., S. Valanarasu, K. Hariprasad, J. S. Ponraj, N. Chidhambaram, V. Ganesh, et al. 2020. “Enhancement of Optoelectronic Parameters of Nd-doped ZnO Nanowires for Photodetector Applications.” Optical Materials 109: 110396. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Prateek, Soumy, Rajnish Garg, Kuldeep Kumar Saxena, V. K. Srivastav, Hitesh Vasudev, and Nikhil Kumar. 2023. “Data-driven Materials Science: Application of ML for Predicting Band Gap.” Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies: 1-10. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pon, V. D., K. J. Wilson, K. Hariprasad, V. Ganesh, H. E. Ali, H. Algarni, and I. S. Yahia. 2021. “Enhancement of Optoelectronic Properties of ZnO Thin Films by Al Doping for Photodetector Applications.” Superlattices and Microstructures 151: 106790. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pariyar, Abhishek, Chandra S. Perugu, K. Dash, and Satish V. Kailas. “Microstructure and mechanical behavior of high toughness Al-based metal matrix composite reinforced with in-situ formed nickel aluminides.” Materials Characterization 171 (2021): 110776. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nair, A., S. Kumanan, C. Prakash, D. G. Mohan, K. K. Sxena, S. Kumar, and G. Kumar. 2023. “Research Developments and Technological Advancements in Conventional and Non-conventional Machining of Superalloys–a Review.” Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology: 1-72. [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu, Shuai, WenSheng Yang, Xiao Shi, Bin Li, Shengchao Duan, Hanjie Guo, and Jing Guo. “Influence of laser process parameters on the densification, microstructure, and mechanical properties of a selective laser melted AZ61 magnesium alloy.” Journal of Alloys and Compounds 808 (2019): 151160. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Li, Donghai, Binbin Wang, Liangshun Luo, Xuewen Li, Yanjin Xu, BinQiang Li, Diween Hawezy et al. “Effect of processing parameters on the microstructure and mechanical properties of TiAl/Ti2AlNb laminated composites.” Journal of Materials Science & Technology 109 (2022): 228-244. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kumari, C. U., A. S. D. Murthy, B. L. Prasanna, M. P. P. Reddy, and A. K. Panigrahy. 2021. “An Automated Detection of Heart Arrhythmias Using Machine Learning Technique: SVM.” Materials Today: Proceedings 45: 1393-1398. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kumar, P., A. Kumar Jain, J. P. Srivastava, R. Kumar, K. K. Saxena, C. Prakash, and D. Buddhi. 2023. “Multiphysics Simulation of the Shape Prediction and Material Removal Rate in Electrochemical Machining Process.” Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies: 1-13. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kumar, P. S. S., and K. V. Allamraju. 2019. “A Review of Natural Fiber Composites [Jute, Sisal, Kenaf].” Materials Today: Proceedings 18: 2556-2562. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Korpi, A. G., Ş. Ţălu, M. Bramowicz, A. Arman, S. Kulesza, B. Pszczolkowski, et al. 2019. “Minkowski Functional Characterization and Fractal Analysis of Surfaces of Titanium Nitride Films.” Materials Research Express 6, no. 8: 086463. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kandhare, A. D., P. A. Thakurdesai, P. Wangikar, and S. L. Bodhankar. 2019. “A Systematic Literature Review of Fenugreek Seed Toxicity by Using ToxRTool: Evidence from Preclinical and Clinical Studies.” Heliyon 5, no. 4. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kalpana, G., P. V. Kumar, S. Aljawarneh, and R. V. Krishnaiah. 2018. “Shifted Adaption Homomorphism Encryption for Mobile and Cloud Learning.” Computers & Electrical Engineering 65: 178-195. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ibrahim, Almigdad B., Fadi A. Al-Badour, Akeem Yusuf Adesina, and Nesar Merah. “Effect of process parameters on microstructural and mechanical properties of friction stir diffusion cladded ASTM A516-70 steel using 5052 Al alloy.” Journal of Manufacturing Processes 34 (2018): 451-462. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gupta, P., N. Gupta, and K. K. Saxena. 2023. “Predicting Compressive Strength of Geopolymer Concrete Using Machine Learning.” Innovation and Emerging Technologies 10: 2350003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Dikshit, M. K., S. Singh, V. K. Pathak, K. K. Saxena, M. K. Agrawal, V. Malik, et al. 2023. “Surface Characteristics Optimization of Biocompatible Ti6Al4V with RCCD and NSGA II Using Die Sinking EDM.” Journal of Materials Research and Technology 24: 223-235. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Chauhan, R. B., T. V. Shah, D. H. Shah, T. J. Gohil, A. D. Oza, B. Jajal, and K. K. Saxena. 2023. “An Overview of Image Processing for Dental Diagnosis.” Innovation and Emerging Technologies 10: 2330001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Chakraborty, D., A. Rathi, R. Singh, V. K. Pathak, A. K. Srivastava, A. Sharma, et al. 2023. “External Six-bar Mechanism Rehabilitation Device for Index Finger: Development and Shape Synthesis.” Robotics and Autonomous Systems 161: 104336. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Bhukya, M. N., and V. R. Kota. 2019. “A Quick and Effective MPPT Scheme for Solar Power Generation During Dynamic Weather and Partial Shaded Conditions.” Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal 22, no. 3: 869-884. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Basavapoornima, C., C. R. Kesavulu, T. Maheswari, W. Pecharapa, S. R. Depuru, and C. K. Jayasankar. 2020. “Spectral Characteristics of Pr3+-doped Lead Based Phosphate Glasses for Optical Display Device Applications.” Journal of Luminescence 228: 117585. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Awasthi, A., K. K. Saxena, and V. Arun. 2021. “Sustainable and Smart Metal Forming Manufacturing Process.” Materials Today: Proceedings 44: 2069-2079. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Awasthi, A., K. K. Saxena, and V. Arun. 2020. “Sustainability and Survivability in Manufacturing Sector.” In Modern Manufacturing Processes, 205-219. Woodhead Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  35. Awasthi, A., A. Gupta, K. K. Saxena, R. K. Dwivedi, D. Kundalkar, D. S. Abdul-Zahra, et al. 2022. “Design and Analysis of Equal-Channel Angular Pressing of Al6061: A Comparative Study.” Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies: 1-10. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.