EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 430 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 430 (2023) 01205 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 430, 2023
15th International Conference on Materials Processing and Characterization (ICMPC 2023)
Article Number 01205
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202343001205
Published online 06 October 2023
  1. T. Luukkonen, Z. Abdollahnejad, J. Yliniemi, P. Kinnunen, M. Illikainen, One-part alkali-activated materials: A review, Cem. Concr. Res. 103 (2018) 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2017.10.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. R.H. Geraldo, L.F.R. Fernandes, G. Camarini, Water treatment sludge and rice husk ash to sustainable geopolymer production, J. Clean. Prod. 149 (2017) 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.076. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. M.K. Mohan, A. V Rahul, G. De Schutter, K. Van Tittelboom, Extrusion-based concrete 3D printing from a material perspective: A state-of-the-art review, Cem. Concr. Compos. 115 (2021) 103855. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103855. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Zia ul haq, H. Sood, R. Kumar, Effect of using plastic waste on mechanical properties of fly ash based geopolymer concrete, Mater. Today Proc. (2022). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.08.233. [Google Scholar]
  5. G. Lazorenko, A. Kasprzhitskii, E.H. Fini, Sustainable construction via novel geopolymer composites incorporating waste plastic of different sizes and shapes, Constr. Build. Mater. 324 (2022) 126697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126697. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Z. Zhang, Y.C. Wong, A. Arulrajah, S. Horpibulsuk, A review of studies on bricks using alternative materials and approaches, Constr. Build. Mater. 188 (2018) 1101–1118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Det Udomsap, P. Hallinger, A bibliometric review of research on sustainable construction, 1994–2018, J. Clean. Prod. 254 (2020) 120073. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120073. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Kumar, N. Mathur, V.S. Rana, H. Sood, M. Nandal, others, Sustainable effect of polycarboxylate ether based admixture: A meticulous experiment to hardened concrete, Mater. Today Proc. (2022). [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Nandal, H. Sood, P.K. Gupta, M.Z.U. Haq, Morphological and physical characterization of construction and demolition waste, Mater. Today Proc. (2022). [Google Scholar]
  10. A.L. Freire, C.D. Moura-Nickel, G. Scaratti, A. De Rossi, M.H. Araújo, A. De Noni Júnior, A.E. Rodrigues, E.R. Castellón, R. de Fátima Peralta Muniz Moreira, Geopolymers produced with fly ash and rice husk ash applied to CO2 capture, J. Clean. Prod. 273 (2020) 122917. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122917. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Driouich, F. Chajri, S.E.A. El Hassani, O. Britel, S. Belouafa, A. Khabbazi, H. Chaair, Optimization synthesis geopolymer based mixture metakaolin and fly ash activated by alkaline solution, J. Non. Cryst. Solids. 544 (2020) 120197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.120197. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. T. Xie, P. Visintin, X. Zhao, R. Gravina, Mix design and mechanical properties of geopolymer and alkali activated concrete: Review of the state-of-the-art and the development of a new unified approach, Constr. Build. Mater. 256 (2020) 119380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119380. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Askarian, Z. Tao, B. Samali, G. Adam, R. Shuaibu, Mix composition and characterisation of one-part geopolymers with different activators, Constr. Build. Mater. 225 (2019) 526–537. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.083. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. W. Prachasaree, S. Limkatanyu, A. Hawa, P. Sukontasukkul, P. Chindaprasirt, Manuscript title: Development of strength prediction models for fly ash based geopolymer concrete, J. Build. Eng. (2020) 101704. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101704. [Google Scholar]
  15. M.N.S. Hadi, H. Zhang, S. Parkinson, Optimum mix design of geopolymer pastes and concretes cured in ambient condition based on compressive strength, setting time and workability, J. Build. Eng. 23 (2019) 301–313. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.02.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Fořt, R. Novotný, E. Vejmelková, A. Trník, P. Rovnaníková, M. Keppert, V. Pommer, R. Černý, Characterization of geopolymers prepared using powdered brick, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 8 (2019) 6253–6261. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.10.019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Zahid, N. Shafiq, M.H. Isa, L. Gil, Statistical modeling and mix design optimization of fly ash based engineered geopolymer composite using response surface methodology, J. Clean. Prod. 194 (2018) 483–498. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.158. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Hassan, M. Arif, M. Shariq, Use of geopolymer concrete for a cleaner and sustainable environment – A review of mechanical properties and microstructure, J. Clean. Prod. 223 (2019) 704–728. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.051. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Y. Luna-Galiano, C. Leiva, F. Arroyo, R. Villegas, L. Vilches, C. Fernández-Pereira, Development of fly ash-based geopolymers using powder sodium silicate activator, Mater. Lett. 320 (2022) 132346. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATLET.2022.132346. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. T. Dufay, B. Guiffard, R. Seveno, S. Ginestar, J.C. Thomas, Flexible PZT thin film transferred on polymer substrate, Surf. Coatings Technol. 343 (2018) 148–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SURFCOAT.2017.09.080. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. G. Agarwal, R.F. Speyer, Devitrification hardening of cupola slag glass with CaO and SiO2 additions, J. Non. Cryst. Solids. 135 (1991) 95–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3093(91)90409-Y. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. P. Pavithra, M. Srinivasula Reddy, P. Dinakar, B. Hanumantha Rao, B.K. Satpathy, A.N. Mohanty, A mix design procedure for geopolymer concrete with fly ash, J. Clean. Prod. 133 (2016) 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.041. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. British Standards Institution, PAS 8820:2016 - Construction Materials – Alkali-Activated Cementitious Material and Concrete – Specification, BSI Stand. Ltd. (2016) 48. [Google Scholar]
  24. P. Nath, P.K. Sarker, V.B. Rangan, Early age properties of low-calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete suitable for ambient curing, Procedia Eng. 125 (2015) 601–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROENG.2015.11.077. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. N. Li, C. Shi, Z. Zhang, H. Wang, Y. Liu, A review on mixture design methods for geopolymer concrete, Compos. Part B Eng. 178 (2019) 107490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107490. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. K. V Pavani, N. Sunil Kumar, and B. B. Sangameswaran, Pol J Microbiol 61, 61 (2012) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. 33. P. Nayak, G. K. Swetha, S. Gupta, and K. Madhavi, Measurement (Lond) 178, (2021) [Google Scholar]
  28. 34. R. Subbiah, M. Rahel, A. Sravika, R. Ambika, A. Srujana, and E. Navya, in Mater Today Proc (2019), pp. 2265–2269 [Google Scholar]
  29. D. Aghimien, N. Ngcobo, C. Aigbavboa, S. Dixit, N. I. Vatin, S. Kampani, and G. S. Khera, Buildings 12, (2022) [Google Scholar]
  30. S. Bhardwaj, P. Singh, and S. Dixit, in Mater Today Proc (2022), pp. 499–507 [Google Scholar]
  31. Y. Kuppusamy, R. Jayaseelan, G. Pandulu, V. S. Kumar, G. Murali, S. Dixit, and N. I. Vatin, Materials 15, (2022) [Google Scholar]
  32. M. H. Momade, S. Durdyev, S. Dixit, S. Shahid, and A. K. Alkali, International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation (2022) [Google Scholar]
  33. R. Gera, R. Yadav, G. S. Khera, A. Saxena, P. Chadha, S. Dixit, and L. Yuliya Sergeevna, in Mater Today Proc (2022), pp. 624–632 [Google Scholar]
  34. N. I. Vatin, G. Murali, S. R. Abid, A. R. Garcez de Azevedo, B. A. Tayeh, and S. Dixit, Materials 15, (2022) [Google Scholar]
  35. S. Dixit and A. Stefańska, in Mater Today Proc (2022), pp. 1882–1885 [Google Scholar]
  36. L. Mishra, S. Dixit, R. Nangia, K. Saurabh, K. Kumar, and K. Sharma, in Mater Today Proc (2022), pp. 419–424 [Google Scholar]
  37. Y. Yang, R. Pratap Singh, D. Song, Q. Chen, X. Zheng, C. Zhang, M. Zhang, and Y. Li, Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 188, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  38. V. Kumar, M. Nanda, and M. Verma, Bioresour Technol 243, 163 (2017) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. N. Sharma, K. K. Jaiswal, V. Kumar, M. S. Vlaskin, M. Nanda, I. Rautela, M. S. Tomar, and W. Ahmad, Renew Energy 174, 810 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.