EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 431 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 431 (2023) 04002 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 431, 2023
XI International Scientific and Practical Conference Innovative Technologies in Environmental Science and Education (ITSE-2023)
Article Number 04002
Number of page(s) 12
Section Water Resources and Aquatic Ecosystems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202343104002
Published online 13 October 2023
  1. M. V Volkodaeva, Y.A. Volodina, IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 1061, 1, 012023 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1061/1/012023 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. F. Pomponi, J. Hart, Appl. Energy 290, 116743 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.309 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. U. Lee, et al., Nucl. Eng. Technol. 51, 6, 1626–1632 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107469 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. X. Zhao, et al., iScience 25, 2, 103741 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.103741 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. D.R. Ulucak, S. Erdogan, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 54, 4, 1312–1320 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2021.10.030 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. T.-Y. Lin, et al., Gas Sci. Eng. 110, 204902 (2023). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jgsce.2023.204902 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. G. Gungor, R. Sari, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 169, 112839 (2022). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.309 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Iqbal, et al., Pollution Assessment for Sustainable Practices in Applied Sciences and Engineering. Elsevier, p. 1027–1053 (2021). https: //doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809582-9.00020-7 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. N.D. Çakar, et al., Nucl. Eng. Technol. 54, 4, 1301–1311 (2022). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109121 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. I. Martón, et al., Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 233, 109121 (2023). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109121 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Algarni, et al., Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments 56, 103098 (2023). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2023.103098 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Dąbrowski, D. Kikoła, Prog. Nucl. Energy 155, 104519 (2023). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2022.167544 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. F. Alam, R. Sarkar, H. Chowdhury, Energy Procedia 160, 3–10 (2019). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.111 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Engelbrecht, Environmental radioactivity monitoring, Handbook of Radioactivity Analysis: 2, 1–40 (2020). https: //doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-814395-7.00001-5 [Google Scholar]
  15. N. Kržanović, et al., Radiat. Phys. Chem. 198, 110291 (2022). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110291 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. N. Amin, et al., Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 190, 122413 (2023). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122413 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Rafei, P. Esmaeili, D. Balsalobre-Lorente, Resour. Policy 78, 102848 (2022). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102848 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. N. Dzhevaga, D. Borisova, J. Ecol. Eng. 22, 4, 175–185 (2021). https: //doi.org/10.12911/22998993/134076 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. L. Qu, et al., J. Environ. Sci. 123, 500–509 (2023). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2022.10.003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. K. Park, et al., Nucl. Eng. Technol. 51, 8, 1991–1997 (2019). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.309 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Barhoum, et al., Trends Environ. Anal. Chem. 38, e00199 (2023). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122413 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. M.-H. Hu, Nucl. Eng. Des. 366, 110761 (2020). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110761 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. M.J. Lee, S.H. Lee, Y. Jung, J. Environ. Radioact. 255, 107031 (2022). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2022.107031 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. J. Dai, et al., J. Clean. Prod. 224, 198–206 (2019). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.206 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. M.M. Ramirez-Corredores, et al., Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 150, 111450 (2021). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102848 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers, Detect. Assoc. Equip. 1046, 167544 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2022.167544 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Amestoy, et al., J. Environ. Radioact. 237, 106695 (2021). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2021.106695 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. P. Singh, L.K. Singh, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 53, 11, 3694–3703 (2021). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104732 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. S. Khizar, et al., TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 157, 116751 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2022.116751 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. B. Peng, et al., Ann. Nucl. Energy 140, 107307 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107307 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. V.T. Pyagay, et al., Procedia Comput. Sci. 170, 26–33 (2020). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. P. Mlakar, et al., Sci. Total Environ. 666, 786–800 (2019). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.309 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. M.M. Ramirez-Corredores, et al., Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 150, 111450 (2021). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102848 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. B. Doan, D.H. Vo, H. Pham, Energy Policy 175, 113478 (2023). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122413 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. M. Shamsuzzaman, et al., Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 229, 104651 (2022). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2022.104651 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. S. Eslami, M.S. Sekhavatjou, J. Clean. Prod. 178, 768–775 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.071 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. P. Vaiano, et al., Opt. Laser Technol. 161, 109177 (2023). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122413 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. A.S. Shamaitis, D.O. Nagornov, Earth and Environmental Sci. 867, 1, 379-382 (2021). DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/867/1/012181 [Google Scholar]
  39. A.V. Strizhenok, D.S. Korelskiy, J. of Physics 1384, 012052 (2019). DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1384/1/012052 [Google Scholar]
  40. E.A. Kremcheev, A.S. Danilov, Y.D. Smirnov, Journal of Mining Institute 235, 96–105 (2019). DOI: 10.31897/pmi.2019.1.96 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. E.I. Kabanov, G.I. Korshunov, E.B. Gridina, Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu 6, 117 – 121 (2019). DOI: 10.29202/nvngu/2019-6/17 [Google Scholar]
  42. I.S. Ilyanko, S.V. Kovshov, E.A. Navikaite, J. of Ecological Eng. 20, 4, 150 – 156 (2019). DOI: 10.12911/22998993/102808 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. P.V. Yakovlev, V.A. Lebedev, V.M. Piskunov, E3S Web of conferences Sustainable Energy Systems: Innovative Perspectives 220, 01079 (2020). DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202022001079 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.