EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 433 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 433 (2023) 02005 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 433, 2023
2023 The 6th International Conference on Renewable Energy and Environment Engineering (REEE 2023)
Article Number 02005
Number of page(s) 7
Section Renewable Energy Power Generation and Electrification
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202343302005
Published online 09 October 2023
  1. E. Nieuwlaar, Life Cycle Assessment and Energy Systems, Encyclopedia of Energy. (2004) 647–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-176480-X/00233-3. [Google Scholar]
  2. E.G. Aklilu, Y.A. Waday, Optimizing the process parameters to maximize biogas yield from anaerobic co-digestion of alkali-treated corn stover and poultry manure using artificial neural network and response surface methodology, Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 2021. (2021) 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13399-021-01966-0. [Google Scholar]
  3. N.V.C. Ngan, F.M.S. Chan, T.S. Nam, H. Van Thao, M.C. Maguyon-Detras, D.V. Hung, D.M. Cuong, N. Van Hung, Anaerobic Digestion of Rice Straw for Biogas Production, in: Sustainable Rice Straw Management, Springer International Publishing, 2020: pp. 65–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32373-8_5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. FAOSTAT, (n.d.). https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL (accessed July 28, 2022). [Google Scholar]
  5. S.N. Nigam, Groundnut at a Glance, (n.d.). [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Singh, S.N. Raina, M. Sharma, M. Chaudhary, S. Sharma, V.R. Rajpal, Functional Uses of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Seed Storage Proteins, Grain and Seed Proteins Functionality. (2021). https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.96871. [Google Scholar]
  7. S.O. Jekayinfa, A.O. Adebayo, O.O. Oniya, K.O. Olatunji, Comparative Analysis of Biogas and Methane Yields from Different Sizes of Groundnut Shell in a Batch Reactor at Mesophilic Temperature, Journal of Energy Research and Reviews. 5 (2020) 34–44. https://doi.org/10.9734/jenrr/2020/v5i130140. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. K.O. Olatunji, D.M. Madyira, N.A. Ahmed, O. Ogunkunle, Biomethane production from Arachis hypogea shells: effect of thermal pretreatment on substrate structure and yield, Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 2022. (2022) 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13399-022-02731-7. [Google Scholar]
  9. K.O. Olatunji, N.A. Ahmed, O. Ogunkunle, Optimization of biogas yield from lignocellulosic materials with different pretreatment methods: a review, Biotechnology for Biofuels 2021 14:1. 14 (2021) 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13068-02102012-X. [Google Scholar]
  10. FAOSTAT, (n.d.). https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL (accessed November 3, 2022). [Google Scholar]
  11. K.E. Ileleji, C. Martin, D. Jones, Basics of Energy Production through Anaerobic Digestion of Livestock Manure, Bioenergy. (2015) 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-4079090.00017-1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Moestedt, B. Müller, M. Westerholm, A. Schnürer, Ammonia threshold for inhibition of anaerobic digestion of thin stillage and the importance of organic loading rate, Microb Biotechnol. 9 (2016) 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12330. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Official Methods of Analysis, 21st Edition (2019) AOAC INTERNATIONAL, (n.d.). https://www.aoac.org/official-methods-of-analysis-21st-edition-2019/ (accessed October 15, 2021). [Google Scholar]
  14. K.O. Olatunji, D.M. Madyira, N.A. Ahmed, O. Ogunkunle, Influence of alkali pretreatment on morphological structure and methane yield of Arachis hypogea shells, Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 2022. (2022) 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13399-022-03271-W. [Google Scholar]
  15. V. organischer Stoffe Substratcharakterisierung, VEREIN DEUTSCHER INGENIEURE Characterisation of the substrate, sampling, collection of material data, fermentation tests VDI 4630 VDI-RICHTLINIEN, 2016. www.vdi.de/richtlinien. [Google Scholar]
  16. A.O. Adebayo, S.O. Jekayinfa, & B. Linke, Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Cattle Slurry with Maize Stalk at Mesophilic Temperature, American Journal of Engineering Research. (n.d.) 2014. www.ajer.org (accessed May 18, 2021). [Google Scholar]
  17. K.O. Olatunji, D.M. Madyira, N.A. Ahmed, O. Ogunkunle, Effect of Combined Particle Size Reduction and Fe3O4 Additives on Biogas and Methane Yields of Arachis hypogea Shells at Mesophilic Temperature, Energies 2022, Vol. 15, Page 3983. 15 (2022) 3983. https://doi.org/10.3390/EN15113983. [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Anhuradha, P. Mullai, A.I. Journal, Mesophilic biodigestion of cowdung and mango peel in relation to bioenergy-batch study, Environmental Science: An Indian Journal. 5 (2010) 320–324. [Google Scholar]
  19. V. Ardaji, H. Radnezhad, M. Nourouzi, Improving Biogas Production Performance From Pomegranate Waste, Poultry Manure and Cow Dung Sludge Using Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion: Effect of Total Solids Adjustment, Journal of Earth, Environment and Health Sciences. 2 (2016) 97. https://doi.org/10.4103/2423-7752.199293. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. K. Aboudi, X. Gómez-Quiroga, C.J. álvarez Gallego, L.I. Romero-García, Insights into Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Lignocellulosic Biomass (Sugar Beet By-Products) and Animal Manure in Long-Term Semi-Continuous Assays, Applied Sciences 2020, Vol. 10, Page 5126. 10 (2020) 5126. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP10155126. [Google Scholar]
  21. P. Rani, V.V. Pathak, M. Bansal, Biogas Production from Wheat Straw using Textile Industrial Wastewater by Co-digestion Process: Experimental and Kinetic Study, Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry. 9 (2022) 601–612. https://doi.org/10.18596/JOTCSA.1009483. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. S.O. Dahunsi, Mechanical pretreatment of lignocelluloses for enhanced biogas production: Methane yield prediction from biomass structural components, Bioresour Technol. 280 (2019) 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.02.006. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Kainthola, A.S. Kalamdhad, V. v. Goud, A review on enhanced biogas production from anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass by different enhancement techniques, Process Biochemistry. 84 (2019) 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCBIO.2019.05.023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Z.E. Ilhan, A.K. Marcus, D.-W. Kang, B.E. Rittmann, R. Krajmalnik-Brown, pH-Mediated Microbial and Metabolic Interactions in Fecal Enrichment Cultures, MSphere. 2 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1128/MSPHERE.00047-17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. B. Dhungana, S.P. Lohani, M. Marsolek, Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Food Waste with Livestock Manure at Ambient Temperature: A Biogas Based Circular Economy and Sustainable Development Goals, Sustainability 2022, Vol. 14, Page 3307. 14 (2022) 3307. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14063307. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. H. Helander, M. Bruckner, S. Leipold, al -, D. Susilo, J.M. S del Rosario, M.T. Elizabeth Navarro, S. Suhartini, Y.P. Lestari, I. Nurika, Estimation of methane and electricity potential from canteen food waste, IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 230 (2019) 012075. https://doi.org/10.1088/17551315/230/1/012075. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. L. Pastare, I. Aleksandrovs, D. Lauka, F. Romagnoli, Mechanical Pre-treatment Effect on Biological Methane Potential From Marine Macro Algae: Results from Batch Tests of Fucus Vesiculosus, Energy Procedia. 95 (2016) 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYPRO.2016.09.021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. M.A.H. Siddhu, J. Li, J. Zhang, Y. Huang, W. Wang, C. Chen, G. Liu, Improve the Anaerobic Biodegradability by Copretreatment of Thermal Alkali and Steam Explosion of Lignocellulosic Waste, Biomed Res Int. 2016 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2786598. [Google Scholar]
  29. S.O. Dahunsi, A.T. Adesulu-Dahunsi, C.O. Osueke, A.I. Lawal, T.M.A. Olayanju, J.O. Ojediran, J.O. Izebere, Biogas generation from Sorghum bicolor stalk: Effect of pretreatment methods and economic feasibility, Energy Reports. 5 (2019) 584–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.04.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. K. Pinpatthanapong, J. Boonnorat, N. Glanpracha, T. Rangseesuriyachai, Biogas production by codigestion of sodium hydroxide pretreated Napier grass and food waste for community sustainability, Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. 44 (2022) 1678–1692. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2022.2055232. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. P.M. Muvhiiwa, Ralph F.Chafa, N. Chikowore, T. Chitsiga, T.S. Matambo, M. Low, Effect of Temperature and PH on Biogas Production from Cow Dung and Dog Faeces., African Journals Online. 45 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  32. U. Mkruqulwa, V. Okudoh, O. Oyekola, Optimizing Methane Production from Co-digestion of Cassava Biomass and Winery Solid Waste Using Response Surface Methodology, Waste and Biomass Valorization 2019 11:9. 11 (2019) 4799–4808. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12649-019-00801Y. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.