EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 437 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 437 (2023) 03006 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 437, 2023
The 5th International Conference on Green Environmental Engineering and Technology (IConGEET2023)
Article Number 03006
Number of page(s) 16
Section Environmental Sustainability and Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202343703006
Published online 16 October 2023
  1. Ssomad MAHA, Husin NA, Hudzari M, et al (2016) Water Quality Monitoring at Bukit Nenasi Highland Irrigation in Kuala Terengganu. In: 3rd National Conference on Knowledge Transfer. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kamarudin MKA, Wahab NA, Jalil NAA, et al (2020) Water quality issues in water resources management at Kenyir Lake, Malaysia. J Teknol 82:1–11. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hanapi NHM, Monajemi H, Ismail A, et al (2022) Biodegradation of Textile Dye Wastewater with the Application of Response Surface Methodology (RSM): A Factorial Design Approach. Trends in Sciences 19:. https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2022.4168 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahmed MS, Massoud AH, Derbalah AS, et al (2020) Biochemical and histopathological alterations in different tissues of rats due to repeated oral dose toxicity of cymoxanil. Animals 10:1–14. [Google Scholar]
  5. Derbalah A, Massoud A, El-Mehasseb I, et al (2021) Microbial detoxification of dimethoate and methomyl residues in aqueous media. Water (Switzerland) 13:. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13081117 [Google Scholar]
  6. Massoud A, Derbalah A, El-Mehasseb I, et al (2021) Photocatalytic detoxification of some insecticides in aqueous media using tio2 nanocatalyst. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:. [Google Scholar]
  7. Tudi M, Ruan HD, Wang L, et al (2021) Agriculture development, pesticide application and its impact on the environment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:1–24 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bhardwaj JK, Saraf P (2014) Malathion-induced granulosa cell apoptosis in caprine antral follicles: An ultrastructural and flow cytometric analysis. Microscopy and Microanalysis 20:1861–1868. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bradford BR, Whidden E, Gervasio ED, et al (2020) Neonicotinoid-containing insecticide disruption of growth, locomotion, and fertility in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS One 15:. [Google Scholar]
  10. Biswas B, Goel S (2022) Electrocoagulation and electrooxidation technologies for pesticide removal from water or wastewater: A review. Chemosphere 302:134709. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Trellu C, Olvera Vargas H, Mousset E, et al (2021) Electrochemical technologies for the treatment of pesticides. Curr Opin Electrochem 26:100677. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Goh PS, Ahmad NA, Wong TW, et al (2022) Membrane technology for pesticide removal from aquatic environment: Status quo and way forward. Chemosphere 307:136018. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Boelan EG, Purnomo AS (2019) Biodegradation of 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis (4chlorophenyl) ethane (DDT) by mixed cultures of white-rot fungus ganoderma lingzhi and bacterium pseudomonas aeruginosa. Hayati 26:90–95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Andrunik M, Bajda T (2021) Removal of pesticides from waters by adsorption: Comparison between synthetic zeolites and mesoporous silica materials. A review. Materials 14 [Google Scholar]
  15. Xie B, Qin J, Wang S, et al (2020) Adsorption of Phenol on Commercial Activated Carbons: Modelling and Interpretation. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17:. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zulkefli NN, Noor Azam AMI, Masdar MS, et al (2022) Performance and Characterization of Bi-Metal Compound on Activated Carbon for Hydrogen Sulfide Removal in Biogas. Molecules 27:. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Krstic DZ, Colovic M, Bavcon Kralj M, et al (2008) Inhibition of AChE by malathion and some structurally similar compounds. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 23:562–573. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kadam US, Trinh KH, Kumar V, et al (2022) Identification and structural analysis of novel malathion-specific DNA aptameric sensors designed for food testing. Biomaterials 287:121617. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Shimizu S, Matubayasi N (2021) Adsorbate-adsorbate interactions on microporous materials. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 323:111254. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Iftekhar S, Ramasamy DL, Srivastava V, et al (2018) Understanding the factors affecting the adsorption of Lanthanum using different adsorbents: A critical review. Chemosphere 204:413–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2018.04.053 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gumus RH, Okpeku I (2015) Production of Activated Carbon and Characterization from Snail Shell Waste (<i>Helix</i> <i>pomatia</i>). Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science 05:51–61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Yang RT (2003) Frontmatter. In: Adsorbents: Fundamentals and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp i–xii. [Google Scholar]
  23. Khalili NR, Campbell M, Sandi G, Golaś J (2000) Production of microand mesoporous activated carbon from paper mill sludge: I. Effect of zinc chloride activation. Carbon N Y 38:1905–1915. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Acharya J, Sahu JN, Sahoo BK, et al (2009) Removal of chromium(VI) from wastewater by activated carbon developed from Tamarind wood activated with zinc chloride. Chemical Engineering Journal 150:25–39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Obaid SA (2020) Langmuir, Freundlich and Tamkin Adsorption Isotherms and Kinetics For The Removal Aartichoke Tournefortii Straw From Agricultural Waste. J Phys Conf Ser 1664:012011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Prasath RR, Muthirulan P, Kannan N (2014) Agricultural wastes as a low cost adsorbents for the removal of Acid Blue 92 dye: A Comparative study with Commercial activated carbon. IOSR J Agric Vet Sci 7:19–32’ [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hafizuddin MS, Lee CL, Chin KL, et al (2021) Fabrication of highly microporous structure activated carbon via surface modification with sodium hydroxide. Polymers (Basel) 13 [Google Scholar]
  28. Jeppu GP, Clement TP (2012) A modified Langmuir-Freundlich isotherm model for simulating pH-dependent adsorption effects. J Contam Hydrol 129–130:46–53. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Vijayakumar G, Tamilarasan R, Dharmendirakumar M (2011) Adsorption, Kinetic, Equilibrium and Thermodynamic studies on the removal of basic dye Rhodamine-B from aqueous solution by the use of natural adsorbent perlite. J Mater Environ Sci 3:157–170 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jusoh A, Hartini WJH, Ali N, Endut A (2011) Study on the removal of pesticide in agricultural run off by granular activated carbon. Bioresour Technol 102:5312–5318. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Musah M, Azeh Y, Mathew J, et al (2022) Adsorption Kinetics and Isotherm Models: A Review. Caliphate Journal of Science and Technology 4:20–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Newhart K (2006) Environmental Fate of Malathion [Google Scholar]
  33. Hamadi NK, Swaminathan S, Chen XD (2004) Adsorption of Paraquat dichloride from aqueous solution by activated carbon derived from used tires. J Hazard Mater 112:133–141. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Arslan G, Pehlivan E (2008) Uptake of Cr3+ from aqueous solution by lignite-based humic acids. Bioresour Technol 99:7597–7605. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Amuda OS, Ibrahim AO (2006) Industrial wastewater treatment using natural material as adsorbent. Afr J Biotechnol 5:1483–1487 [Google Scholar]
  36. Boon S (1998) Removal of Natural Organic Matter from Sg. Sireh Using Local Manufactured Activated Carbon [Google Scholar]
  37. Bansode RR, Losso JN, Marshall WE, et al (2004) Pecan shell-based granular activated carbon for treatment of chemical oxygen demand (COD) in municipal wastewater. Bioresour Technol 94:129–135. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Senthilkumaar S, Krishna SK, Kalaamani P, et al (2010) Adsorption of Organophosphorous Pesticide from Aqueous Solution Using “Waste” Jute Fiber Carbon [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.