EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 439 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 439 (2023) 01010 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 439, 2023
2023 8th International Conference on Ecological Building and Green Building Material (EBGBM 2023)
Article Number 01010
Number of page(s) 5
Section Ecological Construction and Building Energy Saving Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202343901010
Published online 27 October 2023
  1. Xu, X., Niu, D., Qiu, J., Wang, P., Chen, Y. (2016) Analysis and Optimization of Power Supply Structure Based on Markov Chain and Error Optimization for Renewable Energy from the Perspective of Sustainability. J. Sustainability. 8(7). [Google Scholar]
  2. Wang, C., Fei, Y., Ning, L. (2016) Low carbon economic power planning based on multi scenario modeling technology. J. China Electric Power. 49(S1):102–106. [Google Scholar]
  3. Luo, J., Lu, C., Meng, F. (2016) Power planning and benefit evaluation under the constraints of carbon emissions and coal combustion. J. Power System Automation. 40(11):47–52. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhong, J., Jin, G., Zhang, X., et al. (2017) A Power Planning Model Considering Carbon Trading Costs and Energy Efficient Power Plants. J. Advanced Technology of Electrical Engineering and Energy. 36(12):22–29. [Google Scholar]
  5. Li, Y., Ye, Q., Tan, Q., et al. (2019) Research on multi-objective optimization model of power structure considering carbon trading. J. Modern power. 36(04):11–16. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhong, J., Wang, Y., Zhao, Z., et al. (2020) Multi-objective robust optimization research on uncertainty in low-carbon power generation planning. J. Journal of Solar Energy. 41(09):114–120. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang, X., Chen, B., He, Y., et al. (2020) Multi-objective low-carbon power supply planning considering line loss rate for energy-efficient power plants. J. Journal of Solar Energy. 41(05):250–257. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kumar D.P., Deependra S., Bindeshwar S. (2020) Genetic algorithm-based multi-objective optimization for distributed generations planning in distribution systems with constant impedance, constant current, constant power load models. J. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems. 30(11). [Google Scholar]
  9. Meng, J., Liang, C., Song, F., et al. (2022) Optimization Planning Method for Cross border Power Supply Considering Carbon Emission Constraints. J. Global Energy Internet. 5(02): 173–181. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ma, Y., Chu, X. (2022) Optimizing Low-Carbon Pathway of China’s Power Supply Structure Using Model Predictive Control. J. Energies. 15(12). [Google Scholar]
  11. Kaushik, E., Prakash, V., Ghandour, R., Al Barakeh, Z., Ali, A., Mahela, O.P., Álvarez, R.M., Khan, B. (2023) Hybrid Combination of Network Restructuring and Optimal Placement of Distribut ed Generators to Reduce Transmission Loss and Improve Flexibility. J. Sustainability. 15(6). [Google Scholar]
  12. Abou El Ela Adel A., El Sehiemy Ragab, A., Shaheen Abdullah, M., et al. (2023) Reliability constrained dynamic generation expansion planning using honey badger algorithm. J. Scientific Reports. 13(1). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.