Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 440, 2023
International Conference on Environment and Smart Society (ICEnSO 2023)
Article Number 01012
Number of page(s) 16
Section Smart Environment for Smart Cities
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344001012
Published online 01 November 2023
  1. Kašubienė and P. Vanagas (2015), “Assumptions of e-government services quality evaluation,” Engineering Economics, Vol. 5, No. 55, pp. 68-74 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  2. Singh, K.P and Preeti Bhaskar (2015). “Public Policy and Administration Research” ISSN 2224-5731, Vol. 5, No. 12. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gartner, R. (2012). Traditional ROI Measures Will Fail in Government. [Google Scholar]
  4. United Nations (2016). “United Nations E-Government Survey 2016. ISBN: 978-92-1-123205-9. New York. [Google Scholar]
  5. Mekene, Bonaphace. (2009). “the role of e-government in effective service delivery. University of the Western Cape.” [Google Scholar]
  6. Ndou, V. (2004).” E-government for developing countries: opportunities and challenges”. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries; Volume 18 , No.1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mansell, R. and Uta When. Knowledge Societies: Information Technology for Sustainable Development. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 96-97. 1998. [Google Scholar]
  8. Magno, Francisco, Serafica, Ramonette. (2001). Information Technology for Good Governance. Manila, Philippines: Yuchengco Center for East Asia, De La Salle University, ISBN No. 9715553575 [Google Scholar]
  9. Venkatesh, V. & Morris, M.G. (2000). Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115-139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. World Bank, (2012) “E-Governments”. Retrieved From http://web.worldbank.org/on November 25, 2022 [Google Scholar]
  11. Viswanath Venkatesh, Michael G. Morris, Gordon B. Davis and Fred D. Davis (2003). Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota. Vol. 7, No.3, pp. 425-478. [Google Scholar]
  12. Seifert, W. (2003). A Primer on E-Government: Sectors, Stages, Opportunities, and Challenges of Online Governance. Congressional Research Service: The Library of Congress [Google Scholar]
  13. Gregory, G. (2007) “E-government”. Encyclopedia of political Communications. Los Angeles. [Google Scholar]
  14. United Nations (2016). “United Nations E-Government Survey 2016. ISBN: 978-92-1-123205-9. New York. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dillon, M. and Michael G. Morris (1996). User acceptance of Information technology: theories and models. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. Vol. 31. American Society for information science. [Google Scholar]
  16. Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 318-341. [Google Scholar]
  17. Venkatesh, V. & Morris, M.G. (2000). Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115-139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Thompson, P. (2016). What Makes an Award-Winning Government Website. Communication, Digital Government. [Google Scholar]
  19. Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 318-341. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee, Y. Kozar, K.A. & Larsen, K.R.T. (2003). The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, present and future. http://cais.isworld.org. [Google Scholar]
  21. Magno, Francisco, Serafica, Ramonette. Information Technology for Good Governance. 2001. [Google Scholar]
  22. Tola, Ashenafi (2020). Effect of E-Government Based Service Delivery on Customers’ Satisfaction:The Case of Addis Ababa City Administration Vital Events Registration Agency. https://www.grin.com/document/915677 [Google Scholar]
  23. Mitra, R.K. (2012). Rise of E-Governance. Indian Institute of Foreign Trade. [Google Scholar]
  24. Iglesias, Gabrielle. (2010) National College of Public Administration and Governance University of the Philippines. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. Discussion Paper Series No. 2010-22. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.