EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 440 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 440 (2023) 03002 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 440, 2023
International Conference on Environment and Smart Society (ICEnSO 2023)
Article Number 03002
Number of page(s) 12
Section Media and Culture in Smart Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344003002
Published online 01 November 2023
  1. R. Yohana, “Persepsi Digital Dependent terhadap Pemanfaatan Media Sosial dan Dampak Sosial Ekonominya,” J. Ilmu Komun., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 17–32, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  2. A. R. Nuswantoro, “Politik Internet Indonesia: Ide Bebas Terhadap Perkembangan Politik, Ekonomi, dan Demokrasi,” J. ILMU Komun., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 55–68, 2015, doi: 10.24002/jik.v12i1.443. [Google Scholar]
  3. Slamet, A. R. bin Hamdan, and A. Deraman, “E-demokrasi di indonesia, antara peluang dan hambatan pendekatan fenomenologis,” Semin. Nas. Inform., vol. 2009, no. semnasIF, pp. 85–93, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Crothers, “Using the Internet in New Zealand elections and support for e-voting,” Polit. Sci., vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 125–142, 2015, doi: 10.1177/0032318715610165. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. H. Fanida, “Electronic Voting ( E-Voting ) in Indonesia : Reflection On E-Voting Practices in Some Countries,” vol. 226, no. Icss, pp. 150–155, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  6. J. I. Criado, R. Sandoval-Almazan, and J. R. Gil-Garcia, “Government innovation through social media,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 319–326, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Delerue, A. M. Kaplan, and M. Haenlein, “Social media: Back to the roots and back to the future,” J. Syst. Inf. Technol., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 101–104, 2012, doi: 10.1108/13287261211232126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Widayanti, “Pemanfaatan Media Sosial Untuk Penyebaran Informasi,” 2015, [Online]. Available: https://www.esaunggul.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Pemanfataan-Media-Sosial-untuk-Penyebaran-Informasi-Kegiatan-Sekolah-Menengah-Kejuruan-Pasundan-Tangerang.pdf [Google Scholar]
  9. W. Yoo, J. H. Yang, and E. Cho, “How social media influence college students’ smoking attitudes and intentions,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 64, pp. 173–182, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.061. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. O. Belkahla Driss, S. Mellouli, and Z. Trabelsi, “From citizens to government policy-makers: Social media data analysis,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 560–570, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Z. M. Monggilo, “Kajian Literatur Tentang Tipologi Perilaku Berinternet Generasi Muda Indonesia,” J. ILMU Komun., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 31, 2016, doi: 10.24002/jik.v13i1.599. [Google Scholar]
  12. Katadata.co.id, “Berapa Pengguna Media Sosial Indonesia?,” Katadata.Co.Id, p. 2019, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  13. B. J. Jansen, M. Zhang, K. Sobel, and A. Chowdury, “Twitter Power:Tweets as ElectronicWord of Mouth,” J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., vol. 64, no. July, pp. 1852–1863, 2013, doi: 10.1002/asi. [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Z. Sobaci, “Social media and local governments: An overview,” Public Adm. Inf. Technol., vol. 15, pp. 3–21, 2016, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-17722-9_1. [Google Scholar]
  15. F. Z. Emeraldien, R. J. Sunarsono, and R. Alit, “Twitter Sebagai Platform Komunikasi Politik di Indonesia,” SCAN-Jurnal Teknol. Inf. dan Komun., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  16. Normina, “Masyarakat dan Sosialisasi,” J. Kopertais Wil. XI Kalimantan, vol. 12, no. 22, pp. 107–115, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  17. A. D. N. Maulida, “Studi Tentang Efektifitas Dalam Sosialisasi Kartu Tanda Penduduk Elektronic (e-KTP) di Kelurahan Sempaja Selatan Kota Samarinda,” eJournal Ilmu Komun., vol. 2, pp. 140–154, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  18. N. Badria and N. Diana, “Persepsi Pelaku UMKM dan Sosialisasi SAK EMKM Terhadap Diberlakukannya Laporan Keuangan yang Berbasis SAK EMKM 1 Januari 2018,” J. Ilm. Ris. Akunt., vol. 7, no. 01, pp. 55–66, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Chanifa, “Efektivitas Kegiatan Sosialisasi Forum Komunikasi Keluarga Anak dan Kecacatannya (FKKADK) dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Sosial Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus,” Universitas Pasundan, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Van Maanen, “People Processing: Strategies of Organizational Socialization,” Organ. Dyn., pp. 19–36, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  21. G. R. Jones, “Socialization Tactics, Self-Efficacy, and Newcomers’ Adjustments To Organizations.,” Acad. Manag. J., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 262–279, 1986, doi: 10.2307/256188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. T. Y. Kim, D. M. Cable, and S. P. Kim, “Socialization tactics, employee proactivity, and person-organization fit,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 232–241, 2005, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.232. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. J. A. Gruman, A. M. Saks, and D. I. Zweig, “Organizational socialization tactics and newcomer proactive behaviors: An integrative study,” J. Vocat. Behav., vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 90–104, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2006.03.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. B. E. Ashforth, D. M. Sluss, and A. M. Saks, “Socialization tactics, proactive behavior, and newcomer learning: Integrating socialization models,” J. Vocat. Behav., vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 447–462, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2007.02.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Mayfield, What Is Social Networking - What Is Social Networking, vol. 1, no. 8. London: London: iCrossing, 2008. [Online]. Available: http://www.whatissocialnetworking.com/%5Cnhttp://www.whatissocialnetworking.com/article1.html [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Madakam, R. Ramaswamy, and S. Tripathi, “Internet of Things (IoT): A Literature Review,” J. Comput. Commun., vol. 03, no. 05, pp. 164–173, 2015, doi: 10.4236/jcc.2015.35021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. T. Towner and C. L. Muñoz, “Instagramming Issues: Agenda Setting During the 2016 Presidential Campaign,” Soc. media + Soc., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1–13, 2020, doi: 10.1177/2056305120940803. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. I. Kosasih, “Peran Media Sosial Facebook dan Twitter Dalam Membangun Komunikasi (Persepsi dan Motifasi Masyarakat Jejaring Sosial Dalam Pergaulan),” Lembaran Masy. J. Pengemb. Masy. Islam, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 29–42, 2016, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004. [Google Scholar]
  29. A. M. Kaplan and M. Haenlein, “Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media,” Bus. Horiz., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 59–68, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. E. Batara, A. Nurmandi, T. Warsito, and U. Pribadi, “Are government employees adopting local e-government transformation?: The need for having the right attitude, facilitating conditions and performance expectations,” Transform. Gov. People, Process Policy, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 343–376, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  31. P. Näkki et al., Social media for citizen participation report on the somus project, no. 755. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  32. C. Song and J. Lee, “Citizens Use of Social Media in Government, Perceived Transparency, and Trust in Government,” Public Perform. Manag. Rev., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 430–453, 2016, doi: 10.1080/15309576.2015.1108798. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Z. G. Tari and Z. Emamzadeh, “An Analysis of the Media Messages during the 2016 U . S . Presidential Election : A Thematic Comparison between CNN News and Donald Trump ‘ s Tweets,” J. Polit. Law, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 78–87, 2018, doi: 10.5539/jpl.v11n2p78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. J. N. Witanto, H. Lim, and M. Atiquzzaman, “Smart government framework with geo-crowdsourcing and social media analysis,” Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 89, pp. 1–9, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.future.2018.06.019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. M. Gintova, “Understanding government social media users: an analysis of interactions on Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada Twitter and Facebook,” Gov. Inf. Q., no. December 2018, p. 101388, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.005. [Google Scholar]
  36. A. T. Ho and W. Cho, “Government Communication Effectiveness and Satisfaction with Police Performance: A Large-Scale Survey Study,” Public Adm. Rev., vol. xx, no. xx, pp. 1–12, 2016, doi: 10.1111/puar.12563.Government. [Google Scholar]
  37. I. Mergel, “A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 327–334, 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. L. F. Sessions, “HOW OFFLINE GATHERINGS AFFECT ONLINE COMMUNITIES When virtual community members ‘meetup,’” Information, Commun. Soc. Vol., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 375–395, 2010, doi: 10.1080/13691180903468954. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. M. M. Skoric, Q. Zhu, D. Goh, and N. Pang, “Social media and citizen engagement : A meta-analytic review,” new media Soc., vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1817–1839, 2016, doi: 10.1177/1461444815616221. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. L. Buccoliero, E. Bellio, G. Crestini, and A. Arkoudas, “Twitter and politics: Evidence from the US presidential elections 2016,” J. Mark. Commun., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 88–114, 2020, doi: 10.1080/13527266.2018.1504228. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. J. DiGrazia, K. McKelvey, J. Bollen, and F. Rojas, “More tweets, more votes: Social media as a quantitative indicator of political behavior,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 1–5, 2013, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079449. [Google Scholar]
  42. S. Kruikemeier, “How political candidates use Twitter and the impact on votes,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 34, pp. 131–139, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.025. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. I. Petruca, “Personal Branding Through Social Media,” Int. J. Commun. Res., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 389–392, 2015, doi: 10.4018/978-1-4666-9593-1.les4. [Google Scholar]
  44. P. Akbar, B. Irawan, M. Taufik, A. Nurmandi, and Suswanta, “Social Media in Politic: Political Campaign on United States Election 2020 Between Donald Trump and Joe Biden,” Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 1499 CCIS. pp. 359–367, 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-90179-0_46. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. B. Adinugroho, G. F. Prisanto, I. Irwansyah, and N. F. Ernungtyas, “Media Sosial dan Internet Dalam Keterlibatan Informasi Politik dan Pemilihan Umum,” J. Represent., vol. 5, no. 02, pp. 80–95, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  46. L. L. K. Perangin-angin and M. Zainal, “Partisipasi Politik Pemilih Pemula Dalam Bingkai Jejaring Sosial Di Media Sosial,” J. ASPIKOM, vol. 3, no. 4, p. 737, 2018, doi: 10.24329/aspikom.v3i4.210. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. L. J. Moleong, “Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi),” in PT. Remaja Rosda Karya, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.02.055. [Google Scholar]
  48. I. Gunawan, “KUALITATIF Imam Gunawan,” Pendidikan, p. 27, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  49. N. A. Rust and C. Hughes, “Social Science Methods to Study Human-Cheetah Interactions,” Cheetahs Biol. Conserv. Biodivers. World Conserv. from Genes to Landscapes, vol. 1, no. 780, pp. 483–493, 2018, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-804088-1.00035-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. A. Santangeli, V. Arkumarev, N. Rust, and M. Girardello, “Understanding, quantifying and mapping the use of poison by commercial farmers in Namibia – Implications for scavengers’ conservation and ecosystem health,” Biol. Conserv., vol. 204, no. October, pp. 205–211, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. K. B. Wright, “Researching Internet-Based Populations: Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Survey Research, Online Questionnaire Authoring Software Packages, and Web Survey Services,” J. Comput. Commun., vol. 10, no. 3, 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.x. [Google Scholar]
  52. F. Nua, “Pilkada 2020, KPU Target 77,5% Partisipasi Pemilih,” Mediaindonesia.com, 2020. https://mediaindonesia.com/politik-dan-hukum/321499/pilkada-2020-kpu-target-775-partisipasi-pemilih (accessed Mar. 25, 2021). [Google Scholar]
  53. Dindin Herdian, S. I. Redjo, and D. Yusa, “Sosialisasi politik oleh komisi pemilihan umum provinsi dki jakarta dalam membentuk pemilih cerdas pada pemilihan gubernur dan wakil gubernur dki jakarta tahun 2017,” pp. 77–97, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  54. D. S. Indra, A. Miko, and Asmawi, “Payakumbuh Pada Pemilihan Walikota Dan Wakil Walikota Tahun 2017,” vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 413–430, 2018. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.