EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 440 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 440 (2023) 03013 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 440, 2023
International Conference on Environment and Smart Society (ICEnSO 2023)
Article Number 03013
Number of page(s) 14
Section Media and Culture in Smart Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344003013
Published online 01 November 2023
  1. CNN Indonesia, “Poin-poin Pidato Megawati di HUT ke-50 PDIP,” CNN INDONESIA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  2. A. F. Helmi et al., “Hashtag war: 2019 Presidential election rhetoric in Indonesia,” Humanit. Indones. Psychol. J., vol. 17, no. 2, p. 140, 2020, doi: 10.26555/humanitas.v17i2.17045. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. D. J. Ali and Eriyanto, “Political polarization and selective exposure of social media users in indonesia,” J. Ilmu Sos. dan Ilmu Polit., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 268–283, 2021, doi: 10.22146/JSP.58199. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Iyengar, Y. Lelkes, M. Levendusky, N. Malhotra, and S. J. Westwood, “The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States,” Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci., vol. 22, pp. 129–146, 2019, doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Development and I. T. U. T. World, “Creating the smart society : Social and economic development through ICT applications,” Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  6. X. Chen, X. Tang, and X. Xu, “Digital technology-driven smart society governance mechanism and practice exploration,” Front. Eng. Manag., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 319–338, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s42524-022-0200-x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Habermas, Habermas_STBPS_I.Intro.pdf. 1993. [Online]. Available: http://courses.ischool.berkeley.edu/i218/s15/Habermas_STBPS_I.Intro.pdf [Google Scholar]
  8. M. R. Zheltukhina, N. I. Klushina, E. B. Ponomarenko, N. N. Vasilkova, and A. I. Dzyubenko, “Modern media influence: mass culture – mass consciousness – mass communication,” XLinguae, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 96–105, 2017, doi: 10.18355/XL.2017.10.04.09. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Acar and A. Deguchi, “Culture and social media usage: Analysis of japanese twitter users,” Int. J. Electron. Commer. Stud., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 21–32, 2013, doi: 10.7903/ijecs.989. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. F. J. Jennings, V. P. Suzuki, and A. Hubbard, “Social Media and Democracy: Fostering Political Deliberation and Participation,” West. J. Commun., vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 147–167, 2021, doi: 10.1080/10570314.2020.1728369. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. W. L. Bennett and A. Segerberg, “The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics,” Inf. Commun. Soc., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 739–768, 2012, doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. P. Gerbaudo, Tweets And The Streets (Social Media and Contemporary Activism. London: Pluto Press, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  13. H. Gil de Zúñiga and H. T. Chen, “Digital Media and Politics: Effects of the Great Information and Communication Divides,” J. Broadcast. Electron. Media, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 365–373, 2019, doi: 10.1080/08838151.2019.1662019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Dvir-Gvirsman, “Political social identity and selective exposure,” Media Psychol., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 867–889, 2019, doi: 10.1080/15213269.2018.1554493. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. H. J. G. Hassell, “Teaching voters new tricks: The effect of partisan absentee vote-by-mail get-out-the-vote efforts,” Res. Polit., vol. 4, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.1177/2053168017694806. [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Saputra and I. H. Al Siddiq, “Social media and digital citizenship: The urgency of digital literacy in the middle of a disrupted society Era,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 156–161, 2020, doi: 10.3991/IJET.V15I07.13239. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. K. V Korostelina, Social Identity and Conflict. New York: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN, 2007. doi: 10.1057/9780230605671. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. E. A. West and S. Iyengar, Partisanship as a Social Identity: Implications for Polarization, no. 0123456789. Springer US, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s11109-020-09637-y. [Google Scholar]
  19. N. Dias and Y. Lelkes, “The Nature of Affective Polarization: Disentangling Policy Disagreement from Partisan Identity,” Am. J. Pol. Sci., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–16, 2021, doi: 10.1111/ajps.12628. [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Reiljan and A. Ryan, “Ideological Tripolarization, Partisan Tribalism and Institutional Trust: The Foundations of Affective Polarization in the Swedish Multiparty System,” Scan. Polit. Stud., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 195–219, 2021, doi: 10.1111/1467-9477.12194. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Klar, Y. Krupnikov, and J. B. Ryan, “Affective polarization or partisan disdain? Untangling a dislike for the opposing party from a dislike of partisanship,” Public Opin. Q., vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 379–390, 2018, doi: 10.1093/poq/nfy014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. N. Marchal and D. S. Watson, “The paradox of poor representation: How voter–party incongruence curbs affective polarisation,” Br. J. Polit. Int. Relations, 2021, doi: 10.1177/13691481211048502. [Google Scholar]
  23. E. A. Renström, H. Bäck, and R. Carroll, “Threats , Emotions , and Affective Polarization,” Polit. Psychol., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–30, 2023, doi: 10.1111/pops.12899. [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Torcal and Z. A. Thomson, “Social trust and affective polarization in Spain (2014–19),” Elect. Stud., vol. 81, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102582. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. E. Harteveld and M. Wagner, “Does affective polarization increase turnout? Evidence from Germany, Spain and the Netherlands,” Eelcoharteveld.Nl, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–28, 2021, doi: 10.1080/01402382.2022.2087395. [Google Scholar]
  26. D. Serani, “In-Party Like, Out-Party Dislike and Propensity to Vote in Spain,” South Eur. Soc. Polit., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 125–146, 2022, doi: 10.1080/13608746.2022.2047541. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. I. Bantel, “Camps, not just parties. The dynamic foundations of affective polarization in multi-party systems,” Elect. Stud., vol. 83, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102614. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. A. Zimmer, D. H. Smith, and A. Alijla, “Political parties and political volunteering/participation,” in The Palgrave Handbook of Volunteering, Civic Participation, and Nonprofit Associations, vol. 1, 2017, pp. 495–515. doi: 10.1007/978-1-137-26317-9_24. [Google Scholar]
  29. B. Arianto, “Fenomena Relawan Politik dalam Kontestasi Presidensial 2014,” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik. academia.edu, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.academia.edu/download/65368632/Fenomena_Relawan_Politik_dalam_Kontestasi_Presidensial_2014.pdf [Google Scholar]
  30. L. A. Y. Cornelis, “Hometown volunteers: A case study of volunteer organizations in Surakarta supporting Joko Widodo’s presidential campaign,” Copenhagen J. Asian Stud., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 79–105, 2018, doi: 10.22439/cjas.v36i1.5513. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. J. Digrazia, K. Mckelvey, J. Bollen, and F. Rojas, “More Tweets , More Votes : Social Media as a Quantitative Indicator of Political Behavior,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 1–5, 2013, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079449. [Google Scholar]
  32. L. Qiu, H. Lin, J. Ramsay, and F. Yang, “You are what you tweet : Personality expression and perception on Twitter,” J. Res. Pers., vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 710–718, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.08.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. S. Shahin, “Affective Polarization of a Protest and a Counterprotest: Million MAGA March v. Million Moron March,” Am. Behav. Sci., vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 735–756, 2023, doi: 10.1177/00027642221091212. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. L. Lestari and S. S. Johar, “The effect of brand personality and social media to voting behavior of Indonesia presiden 2014,” Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng., vol. 8, no. 2 Special Issue 9, pp. 859–863, 2019, doi: 10.35940/ijrte.B1177.0982S919. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.