EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 440 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 440 (2023) 03017 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 440, 2023
International Conference on Environment and Smart Society (ICEnSO 2023)
Article Number 03017
Number of page(s) 13
Section Media and Culture in Smart Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344003017
Published online 01 November 2023
  1. H. Aguini. Regression analysis for categorical moderators. (Guilford Press, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Akinbi, M.Forshaw, V. Blinkhorn, VContact tracing apps for the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic literature review of challenges and future directions for neo-liberal societies. Health Inf Sci Syst. 2021 Apr 13;9(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s13755-021-00147-7. PMID: 33868671; PMCID: PMC8042619 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. J.C. Anderson, D.W. Gerbing. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin,103(3), 411–423.(1988). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Ansell, E.Sorensen, J.Torfing. The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems. Public Management Review, 23 (7), 949-960, (2021) doi:10.1080/14719037.2020.1820272 [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Ayaz, M. Yanartas, M. An analysis on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology theory (UTAUT): Acceptance of electronic document management system (EDMS). Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 2 (100032), (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100032 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Berdibayev, Y. Kwon. Fear of Covid-19, social isolation and digital financial services during the Covid-19 pandemic: the unified theory of acceptance and use technology (UTAUT) model. 23rd Biennial Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS), (2021). doi: 10419/238010 [Google Scholar]
  7. W. Chin. Bootstrap cross-validation indices for PLS Path Model Assessment. In V. E.Vinzi, H. Wang, J. Henseler & W. Chin (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications in marketing and related fields. Heidelberg: Springer. (2020). [Google Scholar]
  8. Department of the Interior and Local Government. DILG to LGUs, public: Use StaySafe.PH app to boost contact tracing. (2021). Retrieved from https://dilg.gov.ph/news/DILG-to-LGUs-public-Use-StaySafePH-app-to-boost-contact-tracing/NC-2021-1062 [Google Scholar]
  9. Department of the Interior and Local Government. (2021). Retrieved from http://region10.dilg.gov.ph/iligan-city/ [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Garrett, J.White, S. Lewandowsky, Y. Kashima, A. Perfors, D. Little, L. Geard, L. Mitchell, M. Tomko, D. Dennis. The acceptability and uptake of smartphone tracking for COVID-19 in Australia. PLoS ONE, 16(1). (2021). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244827 [Google Scholar]
  11. C. Gonzales. DOH: Iligan City remains low risk for COVID-19. (2021). Retrieved from https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1528508/doh-iligan-city-remains-low-risk-for-covid-19#ixzz7IbSmGCCx [Google Scholar]
  12. O. Götz, K. Liehr-Gobbers, M. Krafft. Evaluation of structural equation models using the partial least squares (PLS) approach. In V. E. Vinzi, H. Wang, J. Henseler & W. W.Chin (Eds.). (2010). [Google Scholar]
  13. Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications in marketing and related fields. Heidelberg: Springer [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Henseler, C. Ringle, R. Sinkovics, R. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing 20. 277-320. (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Iligan News. (2021). Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/iligannews/posts/gaisano-mall-iligan-nag-require-na-og-qr-codeedownload-ang-staysafe-app/3041827919477888/ [Google Scholar]
  16. G. Kostka, S. Habich-Sobiegalla. In times of crisis: public perceptions towards COVID-19 contact tracing apps in China, Germany and the US. Institute of Chinese Studies, Freie University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany. (2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3693783 [Google Scholar]
  17. D.C. Kropf. Applying UTAUT to determine intent to use cloud computing in K-12 classrooms. Available from Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies. (2019). [Google Scholar]
  18. L. Kukuk. Analyzing adoption of Covid-19 contact tracing apps using UTAUT. University of Twente, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science. (2020). Available from http://essay.utwente.nl/81983/1/Kukuk_BA_EEMCS.pdf [Google Scholar]
  19. T. Li, C. Cobb, J. Yang, S. Baviskar, L. Agarwa, B. Li, L. Bauer, J. Hong. What makes people install a COVID-19 contact-tracing app? Understanding the influence of app design and individual difference on contact-tracing app adoption intention. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 75 (101439). (2021) doi: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2021.101439 [Google Scholar]
  20. H. T. Liu. The theory of reasoned action applied to green smartphones: moderating effect of government subsidies. Sustainability, 12 (5979), 1-15. (2015). doi:10.3390/su12155979 [Google Scholar]
  21. I.K. Mensah, G. Zeng, C. Luo. E-government services adoption: an extension of the unified model of electronic government adoption. SAGE Open, 1–17. (2020). doi: 10.1177/2158244020933593 [Google Scholar]
  22. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Coronavirus policy responses. (2021). Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responsestracking-and-tracing-covid-protecting-privacy-and-data-while-using-apps-and-biometrics-8f394636/ [Google Scholar]
  23. K. Oyibo, S. Sahu, A. Oetomo, P.P. Morita. Factors influencing the adoption of contact tracing applications: protocol for a systematic review. JMIR Research Protocols, 10(6). 1-8. (2021) doi: 10.2196/28961 [Google Scholar]
  24. P.L. Phua, S.L. Wong, R. Abu. Factors influencing the behavioural intention to use the internet as a teaching-learning tool in home economics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59 (17), 180-187. (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.263 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. S. A. Raza, W. Qazi, K.A. Khan, J. Salam. Social Isolation and Acceptance of the Learning Management System (LMS) in the time of COVID-19 Pandemic: An Expansion of the UTAUT Model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 0735633120960421. (2020). [Google Scholar]
  26. Rivett. QR code security risks: how to implement secure and accurate contact tracing. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.sine.co/blog/implement-secure-qr-code/ [Google Scholar]
  27. T. Thomas, D. Singh, L. Gaffar. The utility of the UTAUT model in explaining mobile learning adoption in higher education in Guyana. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 9 (3) pp. 71-85. (2013). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/ [Google Scholar]
  28. S. Tomczyk, S. Barth, S. Schmidt, H. Muehlan. Utilizing health behavior change and technology acceptance models to predict the adoption of Covid-19 contact tracing apps: Cross-sectional survey study. Journal Of Medical Internet Research, 23 (5), 1-19. (2021). doi: 10.2196/25447 [Google Scholar]
  29. N. Ugur, A. Turan. Mobile applications acceptance: a theoretical model proposal and empirical test. International Journal of E-Adoption. Volume 11. Issue 2 (2019). DOI: 10.4018/IJEA.2019070102 [Google Scholar]
  30. N. Urbach, F. Ahlemann. Structural equation modeling in information systemsresearch using partial least squares. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 11(2). 5-40. (2010). [Google Scholar]
  31. F. Velicia-Martin, J.P. Cabrera-Sanchez, E. Gil-Cordero, P. Palos-Sanchez. Researching COVID-19 tracing app acceptance: incorporating theory from the technological acceptance model. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 7:e316, 1-20. (2021). DOI 10.7717/peerj-cs.316 [Google Scholar]
  32. V. Venkatesh, F.D. Davis. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal studies. Management Science, 46, 186-204. (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. V. Venkatesh, M. Morris, G. Davis, F. Davis. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478. (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. S.F. Verkijika, L. De Wet. E-government adoption in sub-Saharan Africa. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 30, 83-93. (2018). doi:/10.1016/j.elerap.2018.05.012 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. R. Visco. Covid-19 in the provinces: How are the LGUs doing? (2021) Retrieved from https://businessmirror.com.ph/2021/09/22/covid-19-in-the-provinces-how-are-the-lgus-doing/ [Google Scholar]
  36. M. Walrave, C. Waeterloos, K. Ponnet. Ready or not for contact tracing? Investigating the adoption intention of Covid-19 contact-tracing technology using an extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, And Social Networking, 24 (6). 1-7. (2021). doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0483 [Google Scholar]
  37. S. Williams, C. Armitage, T. Tampe, K. Dienes. Public attitudes towards COVID-19 contact tracing apps: A UK-based focus group study. (2020) doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.14.20102269 [Google Scholar]
  38. World Health Organization. Novel coronavirus (2019-NCOV) situation report - 1. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.who.int/ [Google Scholar]
  39. World Population Review. Iligan population (2021). Retrieved from https://worldpopulationreview.com/world-cities/iligan-population [Google Scholar]
  40. M.V. Zetterholm, Y. Lin, P. Jokela. Scoping Review about Public Acceptance. Informatics 2021, 8, 48. 1-24. (2021) doi: 10.3390/informatics8030048 [Google Scholar]
  41. P.C. Zuniga. The case for an integrated contact tracing ecosystem in the Philippines. (2021). Retrieved from http://sil-asia.org/the-case-for-an-integrated-contact-tracing-ecosystem-in-the-philippines/ [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.