EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 440 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 440 (2023) 03020 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 440, 2023
International Conference on Environment and Smart Society (ICEnSO 2023)
Article Number 03020
Number of page(s) 11
Section Media and Culture in Smart Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344003020
Published online 01 November 2023
  1. C. Bıyık et al., “Smart mobility adoption: A review of the literature,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 146, 2021, doi: 10.3390/joitmc7020146. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. K. Hassanzadehkermanshahi and S. Shirowzhan, “Measuring Urban Sustainability over Time at National and Regional Scale for Addressing United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 11: Iran and Tehran as Case Studies,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1–25, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14127402. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. K. L. Whittingham, A. G. Earle, D. I. Leyva-de la Hiz, and A. Argiolas, “The impact of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals on corporate sustainability reporting,” BRQ Bus. Res. Q., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 45–61, 2023, doi: 10.1177/23409444221085585. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. L. Carlsen and R. Bruggemann, “The 17 United Nations’ sustainable development goals: a status by 2020,” Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 219–229, 2022, doi: 10.1080/13504509.2021.1948456. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Šurdonja, T. Giuffrè, and A. Deluka-Tibljaš, “Smart mobility solutions-necessary precondition for a well-functioning smart city,” Transp. Res. Procedia, vol. 45, no. 2019, pp. 604–611, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.051. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. K. S. Willis and C. Nold, “Sense and the city: An Emotion Data Framework for smart city governance,” J. Urban Manag., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 142–152, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jum.2022.05.009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Porru, F. E. Misso, F. E. Pani, and C. Repetto, “Smart mobility and public transport: Opportunities and challenges in rural and urban areas,” J. Traffic Transp. Eng. (English Ed., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 88–97, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jtte.2019.10.002. [Google Scholar]
  8. D. L. Angarita Lozano, S. E. Diaz Marquez, and M. E. Morales Puentes, “Sustainable and smart mobility evaluation since citizen participation in responsive cities,” Transp. Res. Procedia, vol. 58, pp. 519–526, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2021.11.069. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Wawer, K. Grzesiuk, and D. Jegorow, “Smart Mobility in a Smart City in the Context of Generation Z Sustainability, Use of ICT, and Participation,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 13, pp. 1–30, 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15134651. [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Juvenile Ehwi, H. Holmes, S. Maslova, and G. Burgess, “The ethical underpinnings of Smart City governance: Decision-making in the Smart Cambridge programme, UK,” Urban Stud., 2022, doi: 10.1177/00420980211064983. [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Kirimtat, O. Krejcar, A. Kertesz, and M. F. Tasgetiren, “Future Trends and Current State of Smart City Concepts: A Survey,” IEEE, vol. 8, pp. 86448–86467, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2992441. [Google Scholar]
  12. I. R. Rustan, J. Nawawi, N. Nara, and ..., “Regional Medium-Term Development Planning Based On Regional Development From Top-Down Approach,” J. Posit. …, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 3327–3338, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://www.journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/7857%0Ahttps://www.journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/download/7857/5125. [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Sumadi, O. Ardhiarisca, R. R. Wijayanti, and R. Putra, “Evaluation of Development Planning in Kemuning Lor Village, Arjasa District, Jember Regency,” Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Soc. Sci. Humanit. Public Heal. (icosh. 2021), vol. 645, no. Icoship 2021, pp. 33–39, 2022, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.220207.006. [Google Scholar]
  14. E. L. Alma’Arif Wargadinata, “Adopting Open Government in Local Development Planning,” J. Kebijak. dan Adm. Publik, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 18–32, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jkap. [Google Scholar]
  15. S. S. Hutagalung and D. Hermawan, “Evaluation of Local Government Innovation Program in Lampung Province,” J. Bina Praja, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 241–250, 2018, doi: 10.21787/jbp.10.2018.241-250. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. K. Romli, M. Oktaviannur, D. Rinova, and Y. Y. Dharmawan, “Analysis of Tourism Mapping in Lampung Province to Optimize Entrepreneurship Development,” Rev. Integr. Bus. Econ. Res., vol. 8, no. December, p. 110, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  17. I. G. Osawaldo, “10 Provinsi dengan Jalan Rusak Terbanyak di RI, Nomor 1 Bukan Lampung,” finance.detik.com, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  18. C. M. Annur, “Lampung Masuk Daftar 10 Provinsi dengan Jalan Rusak Berat Terpanjang,” Katadata.com, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Lidwina, “Cek Data: Ramai Dikritik di Medsos, Bagaimana Kondisi Ekonomi Lampung?,” Katadata.com, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  20. L. Butler, T. Yigitcanlar, and A. Paz, “How can smart mobility innovations alleviate transportation disadvantage? Assembling a conceptual framework through a systematic review,” Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 18, 2020, doi: 10.3390/APP10186306. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Paiva, M. A. Ahad, G. Tripathi, N. Feroz, and G. Casalino, “Enabling technologies for urban smart mobility: Recent trends, opportunities and challenges,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1–45, 2021, doi: 10.3390/s21062143. [Google Scholar]
  22. B. C. Ibănescu, G. C. Pascariu, A. Bănică, and I. Bejenaru, “Smart city: A critical assessment of the concept and its implementation in Romanian urban strategies,” J. Urban Manag., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 246–255, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jum.2022.05.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Wallsten, M. Henriksson, and K. Isaksson, “The Role of Local Public Authorities in Steering toward Smart and Sustainable Mobility: Findings from the Stockholm Metropolitan Area,” Plan. Pract. Res., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 532–546, 2021, doi: 10.1080/02697459.2021.1874638. [Google Scholar]
  24. H. Pan, S. Geertman, B. Deal, J. Jiao, and B. Wang, “Planning Support for Smart Cities in the Post-COVID Era,” J. Urban Technol., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 1–5, 2022, doi: 10.1080/10630732.2022.2069938. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. F. A. Nuzir and R. Saifuddin, “Smart people, smart mobility,” Konsep Kota Pint. yang Bertumpu pada Masy. dan pergerakannya di Kota Metro, vol. 2008, no. September, pp. 1–5, 2015, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3056.4324. [Google Scholar]
  26. R. Lestari, T. Rachmawati, F. A. Kamandanu, and D. Syahrobi, “Lampung Tourism Supply During the Pandemic and Post Covid-19 Pandemic,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Indonesia Conference on Interdisciplinary Studies (IICIS 2021), 2022, vol. 606, no. Iicis, pp. 78–86, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.211206.012. [Google Scholar]
  27. BPS, “15 Provinsi dengan Jalan Provinsi & Rusak Berat Terpanjang di Indonesia,” 2023. [Google Scholar]
  28. M. A. B. Nadi, Nurfaizia, M. N. Karunia, W. A. N. Aspar, W. Barasa, and A. Fudholi, “Characterization of Site Effect and Natural Frequency of Railway Bridges,” Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 243–249, 2022, doi: 10.18280/ijsdp.170124. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. A. B. Pratama and S. A. Imawan, “A scale for measuring perceived bureaucratic readiness for smart cities in Indonesia,” Public Adm. Policy, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 25–39, 2019, doi: 10.1108/PAP-01-2019-0001. [Google Scholar]
  30. KementrianPUPR, Informasi Statsistik Infrastruktur PUPR 2021. Jakarta: Pusat Data dan Teknologi Informasi, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  31. A. F. Hidayatullah, M. R. Ma’arif, M. Habibie, and S. Khomsah, “Indonesia Infrastructure Development Topic Discovery on Online News with Latent Dirichlet Allocation,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1077, no. 1, p. 012012, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/1077/1/012012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Z. S. Kusharsanto, N. Maninggar, Suhandojo, D. Maulidya, and A. R. Muzaki, “How infrastructure contributes to fostering Regional Innovation System: The case of Pelalawan Regency - Indonesia,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 778, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/778/1/012001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. T. Träskman, “Smartness and thinking infrastructure: an exploration of a city becoming smart,” J. Public Budgeting, Account. Financ. Manag., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 665–688, 2022, doi: 10.1108/JPBAFM-12-2020-0200. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. F. Brandajs and A. P. Russo, “Smarter city, less just destination? Mobilities and social gaps in Barcelona,” J. Place Manag. Dev., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 291–308, 2023, doi: 10.1108/jpmd-03-2022-0020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. L. Penco, E. Ivaldi, and A. Ciacci, “Entrepreneurial ecosystem and well-being in European smart cities: a comparative perspective,” TQM J., vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 318–350, 2021, doi: 10.1108/TQM-04-2021-0097. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. M. S. Samsurijan, A. Ebekozien, N. A. Nor Azazi, M. M. Shaed, and R. F. Radin Badaruddin, “Artificial intelligence in urban services in Malaysia: a review,” PSU Res. Rev., 2023, doi: 10.1108/PRR-07-2021-0034. [Google Scholar]
  37. L. H. C. Pinochet, G. F. Romani, C. A. de Souza, and G. Rodríguez-Abitia, “Intention to live in a smart city based on its characteristics in the perception by the young public,” Rev. Gest., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 73–92, 2019, doi: 10.1108/REGE-06-2018-0077. [Google Scholar]
  38. W. Matli and S. F. Wamba, “Work from anywhere: inequalities in technology infrastructure distribution for digit workers,” Digit. Transform. Soc., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 149–162, 2023, doi: 10.1108/dts-08-2022-0042. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. N. Nairobi and R. Respitasari, “Public Infrastructure and Economic Growth in the Local Region,” J. Ekon. Pembang., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 51–60, 2021, doi: 10.29259/jep.v19i1.13826. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kominfo, “Indeks Masyarakat Digital,” Jakarta, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  41. O. Adeola and O. Evans, “ICT, infrastructure, and tourism development in Africa,” Tour. Econ., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 97–114, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1354816619827712. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. N. S. N. Wahab, T. W. Seow, I. S. M. Radzuan, and S. Mohamed, “A Systematic Literature Review on the Dimensions of Smart Cities,” in 5th International Conference on Civil and Environmental Engineering for Sustainability, IConCEES 2019, 2020, vol. 498, no. 1, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/498/1/012087. [Google Scholar]
  43. C. C. Okafor, C. Aigbavboa, and W. D. Thwala, “A Delphi approach to evaluating the success factors for the application of smart mobility systems in smart cities: a construction industry perspective,” Int. J. Constr. Manag., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–10, 2021, doi: 10.1080/15623599.2021.1968567. [Google Scholar]
  44. G. Puron-Cid and J. R. Gil-Garcia, “Are Smart Cities Too Expensive in the Long Term? Analyzing the Effects of ICT Infrastructure on Municipal Financial Sustainability,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 10, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14106055. [Google Scholar]
  45. KementrianPUPR, “Konsep Smart City,” 2022. [Google Scholar]
  46. Tvonenews.com, “Kapolda Lampung: Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas Tahun 2022 Meningkat 31,28 Persen,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.tvonenews.com/daerah/sumatera/99082-kapolda-lampung-pelanggaran-lalu-lintas-tahun-2022-meningkat-3128-persen?page=1. [Google Scholar]
  47. V. Oktavia, “Pemudik Mulai Ramaikan Lampung, Jalan Rusak dan Minimnya Penerangan Dikeluhkan,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.kompas.id/baca/nusantara/2023/04/18/pemudik-mulai-ramaikan-lampung-jalan-rusak-dan-minimnya-penerangan-dikeluhkan. [Google Scholar]
  48. A. Pompigna and R. Mauro, “Smart roads: A state of the art of highways innovations in the Smart Age,” Eng. Sci. Technol. an Int. J., vol. 25, p. 100986, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jestch.2021.04.005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. S. S. V. Subbarao and R. Kadali, “Impact of COVID-19 pandemic lockdown on the public transportation system and strategic plans to improve PT ridership: a review,” Innov. Infrastruct. Solut., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s41062-021-00693-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. A. Marusin, A. Marusin, and T. Ablyazov, “Transport infrastructure safety improvement based on digital technology implementation,” Atl. Press, vol. 1, no. Icdtli, pp. 353–357, 2019, doi: 10.2991/icdtli-19.2019.61. [Google Scholar]
  51. H. D. Gang Kou, Serhat Yuksel, “Inventive problem-solving map of innovative carbon emission strategies for solar energy-based transportation investment projects,” Appl. Energyn, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118680. [Google Scholar]
  52. C. B. Azolibe and J. J. Okonkwo, “Infrastructure development and industrial sector productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa,” J. Econ. Dev., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 91–109, 2020, doi: 10.1108/jed-11-2019-0062. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. M. Pańkowska and A. Sołtysik-Piorunkiewicz, “ICT Supported Urban Sustainability by Example of Silesian Metropolis,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 3, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14031586. [Google Scholar]
  54. N. Mittal, R. Agarwal, and W. Selen, “Value creation and the impact of policy interventions: Indian LPG supply chain case study,” Int. J. Logist. Manag., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 64–89, 2018, doi: 10.1108/IJLM-10-2016-0242. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.