Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 440, 2023
International Conference on Environment and Smart Society (ICEnSO 2023)
Article Number 03022
Number of page(s) 12
Section Media and Culture in Smart Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344003022
Published online 01 November 2023
  1. P. Akbar, A. Nurmandi, B. Irawan, en J. Loilatu, “Research Trends in E-Government Interoperability : Mapping Themes and Concepts Based on The Scopus Database”, vol 14, no 2, bll 83–108, 2022, doi: 10.29379/jedem.v14i2.707. [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Zeid, S. Sundaram, M. Moghaddam, S. Kamarthi, en T. Marion, “Interoperability in smart manufacturing: Research challenges”, Machines, vol 7, no 2, bll 1–17, 2019, doi: 10.3390/machines7020021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. L. Xu, P. de Vrieze, H. Yu, K. Phalp, en Y. Bai, “Interoperability of the future factory: An overview of concepts and research challenges”, Int. J. Mechatronics Manuf. Syst., vol 13, no 1, bll 3–27, 2020, doi: 10.1504/IJMMS.2020.108333. [Google Scholar]
  4. V. Kalogirou, A. Stasis, en Y. Charalabidis, “Adapting national interoperability frameworks beyond EIF 3.0: The case of Greece”, ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser., bll 234–243, 2020, doi: 10.1145/3428502.3428536. [Google Scholar]
  5. G. da Silva Serapião Leal, W. Guédria, en H. Panetto, “Interoperability assessment: A systematic literature review”, Comput. Ind., vol 106, bll 111–132, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2019.01.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Burns, J. Cosgrove, en F. Doyle, “A review of interoperability standards for industry 4.0.”, Procedia Manuf., vol 38, no 2019, bll 646–653, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.083. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Z. Ahmad, A. R. Abu Bakar, en N. Ahmad, “Social media adoption and its impact on firm performance: the case of the UAE”, Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res., vol 25, no 1, bll 84–111, 2019, doi: 10.1108/IJEBR-08-2017-0299. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Rani, N. Goyal, en S. K. Gadia, “Social data provenance framework based on zero information loss graph database”, Soc. Netw. Anal. Min., vol 12, no 1, bll 1–25, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s13278-022-00889-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. J. Islami, “Implementasi Satu Data Indonesia: Tantangan dan <em>Critical Success Factors</em> (CSFs)”, J. Komunika J. Komunikasi, Media dan Inform., vol 10, no 1, bl 13, 2021, doi: 10.31504/komunika.v10i1.3750. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M. R. Rizky Maulidya, “Analisis retrospektif kebijakan satu data indonesia”, Din. J. Ilm. Ilmu Adm. Negara, vol 9, bll 6–8, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  11. I. Ardani en H. S. H. Cahyani, “Tantangan Kebijakan Satu Data Indonesia”, Bul. Penelit. Sist. Kesehat., vol 25, no 1, bll 52–60, 2022, doi: 10.22435/hsr.v25i1.4167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Bailey en P. Misra, “Interoperability of Social Media: An appraisal of the regulatory and technical ecosystem”, SSRN Electron. J., bll 1–39, 2022, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4095312. [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Haro-de-Rosario, A. Sáez-Martín, en M. del Carmen Caba-Pérez, “Using social media to enhance citizen engagement with local government: Twitter or Facebook?”, New Media Soc., vol 20, no 1, bll 29–49, 2018, doi: 10.1177/1461444816645652. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J. W. Creswell, “Research Design: Qualitatif, Quantitatif, Mix Method”, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zamawe, “The implication of using NVivo software in qualitative data analysis: Evidence-based reflections. Malawi Medical Journal, 27(1), 13±15”, 2015. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Campmas, N. Iacob, en F. Simonelli, “How can interoperability stimulate the use of digital public services? An analysis of national interoperability frameworks and e-Government in the European Union”, Data Policy, vol 4, 2022, doi: 10.1017/dap.2022.11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Adel Rezk, M. H. Aliyu, H. Bensta, en A. Ojo, “Standardising public policy documentation to foster collaboration across government agencies”, IFIP Adv. Inf. Commun. Technol., vol 506, bll 466–477, 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-65151-4_42. [Google Scholar]
  18. C. Zhang, C. Fan, W. Yao, X. Hu, en A. Mostafavi, “Social media for intelligent public information and warning in disasters: An interdisciplinary review”, Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol 49, no October 2018, bll 190–207, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. A. S. T. Olanrewaju, M. A. Hossain, N. Whiteside, en P. Mercieca, “Social media and entrepreneurship research: A literature review”, Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol 50, no May 2019, bll 90–110, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. B. H. Allcott, L. Braghieri, S. Eichmeyer, en M. Gentzkow, “The Welfare Effects of Social Media”, vol 110, no 3, bll 629–676, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  21. H. Wahyuni, A. Nurmandi, D. Mutiarin, Suswanta, en Salahudin, The Influence of Social Media on the Omnibus Law-Making Process in Indonesia, vol 1352. Springer International Publishing, 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-71782-7_44. [Google Scholar]
  22. R. Saleh, “Peran Sosial Media Dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Pemerintah ( Studi Kasus Informasi Akun Instagram @ Palembang . Update )”, bll 36–39, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  23. Y. Charalabidis, G. Gionis, en E. Loukis, “Policy Processes Support Through Interoperability With Social Media”, MCIS 2010 Proc., 2010, [Online]. Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/mcis2010/18 [Google Scholar]
  24. D. Er Riyanto, P. Wisnu Wirawan, en K. Kurniawan, “E-Government Interoperability: Architecture Model for Public Information Services of Sub-District Governments”, MATEC Web Conf., vol 218, 2018, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201821803008. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  25. H. Shmagun, C. Oppenheim, J. Shim, K.-N. Choi, en J. Kim, Factors of Open Science Data Sharing and Reuse in the COVID-19 Crisis: A Case Study of the South Korea R&D Community BT - Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  26. J. Kahne en B. Bowyer, “Can media literacy education increase digital engagement in politics?”, Learn. Media Technol., vol 44, no 2, bll 211–224, 2019, doi: 10.1080/17439884.2019.1601108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Y. Tian en J. Hong, “In the Context of Digital Finance, Can Knowledge Enable Manufacturing Companies to Be More Courageous and Move towards Sustainable Innovation?”, Sustain., vol 14, no 17, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su141710634. [Google Scholar]
  28. R. Vivona, M. A. Demircioglu, en A. Raghavan, “The Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant”, Palgrave Handb. Public Servant, no June, 2021, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-29980-4. [Google Scholar]
  29. I. A. Tsindeliani et al., “Influence of the budgetary law on state management in the conditions of the development of the digital economy”, Informatologia, vol 52, no 1–2, bll 17–27, 2019, doi: 10.32914/i.52.1-2.3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. P. Nyoka en M. Tembo, “Dimensions of democracy and digital political activism on Hopewell Chin’ono and Jacob Ngarivhume Twitter accounts towards the July 31st demonstrations in Zimbabwe”, Cogent Soc. Sci., vol 8, no 1, 2022, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2021.2024350. [Google Scholar]
  31. I. Pietilä, N. Meriläinen, J. Varsaluoma, en K. Väänänen, “Understanding youths’ needs for digital societal participation: towards an inclusive Virtual Council”, Behav. Inf. Technol., vol 40, no 5, bll 483–496, 2021, doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2021.1912182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. R. Nicolescu, M. Huth, P. Radanliev, en D. De Roure, “Mapping the values of IoT”, J. Inf. Technol., vol 33, no 4, bll 345–360, 2018, doi: 10.1057/s41265-018-0054-1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. M. Chen en J. Grossklags, “Social Control in the Digital Transformation of Society: A Case Study of the Chinese Social Credit System”, Soc. Sci., vol 11, no 6, 2022, doi: 10.3390/socsci11060229. [Google Scholar]
  34. E. T. Ewing, K. Randall, en J. S. Reznick, “From postcard to book cover: Illustrating connections between medical history and digital humanities”, J. Med. Libr. Assoc., vol 107, no 4, bll 621–625, 2019, doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.745. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. P. Tammpuu, A. Masso, M. Ibrahimi, en T. Abaku, “Estonian E-Residency and Conceptions of Platform-Based State-Individual Relationship”, Trames, vol 26, no 1, bll 3–21, 2022, doi: 10.3176/tr.2022.1.01. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. E. Lee, Y. D. Seo, S. R. Oh, en Y. G. Kim, “A Survey on Standards for Interoperability and Security in the Internet of Things”, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol 23, no 2, bll 1020–1047, 2021, doi: 10.1109/COMST.2021.3067354. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. N. Kumar, L. Qiu, en S. Kumar, “A Hashtag Is Worth a Thousand Words: An Empirical Investigation of Social Media Strategies in Trademarking Hashtags”, Inf. Syst. Res., vol 33, no 4, bll 1403–1427, 2022, doi: 10.1287/isre.2022.1107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. F. Santiago Rodriguez en N. Komendantova, “Approaches To Participatory Policymaking Processes: Technical Report”, no March, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  39. Bappeda Kaltim, “Sosialisasi Satu Data Indonesia”, 2020, [Online]. Available at: https://bappeda.kaltimprov.go.id/postingan/sosialisasi-satu-data-indonesia [Google Scholar]
  40. Kementerian PPN/Bappenas, “Peluncuran data.go.id, Portal Satu Data Indonesia untuk Bagi Pakai Data”, 2022, [Online]. Available at: https://www.bappenas.go.id/berita/peluncuran-datagoid-portal-satu-data-indonesia-untuk-bagi-pakai-data-b2Xnt [Google Scholar]
  41. R. B. Hubert, E. Estevez, A. Maguitman, en T. Janowski, “Examining government-citizen interactions on twitter using visual and sentiment analysis”, in 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age, DG.O 2018, 2018. doi: 10.1145/3209281.3209356. [Google Scholar]
  42. J. E. Relly en M. Sabharwal, “Perceptions of transparency of government policymaking: A cross-national study”, Gov. Inf. Q., vol 26, no 1, bll 148–157, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2008.04.002. [Google Scholar]
  43. K. Turnip, A. H. Lubis, Sutrisno, en M. S. Lubis, “A review of ict in government bureaucracy: Psychological and technology skill perspectives”, Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol., vol 9, no 9, bll 1309–1319, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  44. Nidia Zuraya, “Bappenas Luncurkan Satu Data Indonesia”, 2022, [Online]. Available at: https://ekonomi.republika.co.id/berita/rnc1x2383/bappenas-luncurkan-satu-data-indonesia [Google Scholar]
  45. Indonesiabaik.id, “Pemanfaatan Data Bersama Satu Data Indonesia”, 2020, [Online]. Available at: https://indonesiabaik.id/motion_grafis/pemanfaatan-data-bersama-satu-data-indonesia [Google Scholar]
  46. N. Ireland, “Consociationalism and Power-Sharing in Europe”, Consociationalism Power-Sharing Eur., no February, bll 0–27, 2018, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-67098-0. [Google Scholar]
  47. Panrb, “Grand Launching Portal Satu Data Indonesia”, 2022, [Online]. Available at: https://www.menpan.go.id/site/berita-foto/grand-launching-portal-satu-data-indonesia [Google Scholar]
  48. Wibi Pangestu, “Jokowi Tugaskan Satu Data Indonesia Kelola Data, Apa Bedanya dengan BPS?”, 2023, [Online]. Available at: https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20230130/9/1622776/jokowi-tugaskan-satu-data-indonesia-kelola-data-apa-bedanya-dengan-bps [Google Scholar]
  49. F. H. F. Botelho, “Accessibility to digital technology: Virtual barriers, real opportunities”, Assist. Technol., vol 33, no sup1, bll 27–34, 2021, doi: 10.1080/10400435.2021.1945705. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. A. A. Zahra, E. P. Purnomo, en A. N. Kasiwi, “New Democracy in Digital Era through Social Media and News Online”, Humaniora, vol 11, no 1, bl 13, 2020, doi: 10.21512/humaniora.v11i1.6182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. F. Lelli, “Interoperability of the time of Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things”, Futur. Internet, vol 11, no 2, 2019, doi: 10.3390/fi11020036. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. BSSN.go.id, “Hadiri Peluncuran Portal Satu Data Indonesia, Kepala BSSN Berkomitmen Kawal Tata Kelola Keamanan Data Instansi Pusat Hingga Daerah”, 2022, [Online]. Available at: https://bssn.go.id/hadiri-peluncuran-portal-satu-data-indonesia-kepala-bssn-berkomitmen-kawal-tata-kelola-keamanan-data-instansi-pusat-hingga-daerah/ [Google Scholar]
  53. D. Trček, “E-Government 4.0: Managing APIs as Facilitators for Digital Transformation”, Acad. J. Interdiscip. Stud., vol 11, no 1, bll 1–14, 2022, doi: 10.36941/ajis-2022-0001. [Google Scholar]
  54. F. Fatimayin, “What is Communication?”, 2018. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.