EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 440 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 440 (2023) 03027 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 440, 2023
International Conference on Environment and Smart Society (ICEnSO 2023)
Article Number 03027
Number of page(s) 8
Section Media and Culture in Smart Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344003027
Published online 01 November 2023
  1. K. Mossberger, Y. Wu, and J. Crawford, “Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 351–358, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. K. Koc-Michalska, D. G. Lilleker, and T. Vedel, “Civic political engagement and social change in the new digital age,” New Media and Society, vol. 18, no. 9. SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England, pp. 1807–1816, 2016. doi: 10.1177/1461444815616218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. M. W. Graham, “Government communication in the digital age: Social media’s effect on local government public relations,” Public Relations Inq., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 361–376, 2014, doi: 10.1177/2046147X14545371. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. M. A. Berawi, P. Miraj, R. Windrayani, and A. R. B. Berawi, “Stakeholders’ perspectives on green building rating: A case study in Indonesia,” Heliyon, vol. 5, no. 3, p. e01328, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01328. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Bonita and D. Wadley, “Disposal of government offices in Jakarta pending relocation of the Indonesian capital: an application of multi-criteria analysis,” Prop. Manag., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 591–628, 2022, doi: 10.1108/PM-10-2020-0068. [Google Scholar]
  6. E. Riva Sanseverino, R. Riva Sanseverino, V. Vaccaro, I. Macaione, and E. Anello, “Smart cities: Case studies,” Smart Cities Atlas West. East. Intell. Communities, pp. 47–140, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  7. E. Jurriëns, “Urban transition through Indonesian art: from the Generation of ‘66 to the Millennials,” World Art, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 229–254, 2021, doi: 10.1080/21500894.2021.1893806. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. T. Yigitcanlar and S. H. Lee, “Korean ubiquitous-eco-city: A smart-sustainable urban form or a branding hoax?,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 89, pp. 100–114, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.034. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. J. B. H. Yap, C. Y. Chua, and M. Skitmore, “Towards Sustainable Mobility with Transit-Oriented Development (TOD): Understanding Greater Kuala Lumpur,” Plan. Pract. Res., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 314–336, 2021, doi: 10.1080/02697459.2021.1883249. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M. F. A. Bakar, S. Norhisham, H. Y. Katman, C. M. Fai, N. N. I. M. Azlan, and N. S. S. Samsudin, “Service Quality of Bus Performance in Asia: A Systematic Literature Review and Conceptual Framework,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 13, p. 7998, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14137998. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Zhao, Y. Yen, E. Bailey, and M. T. Sohail, “Analysis of urban drivable and walkable street networks of the ASEAN smart cities network,” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Information, vol. 8, no. 10, p. 459, 2019, doi: 10.3390/ijgi8100459. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Hirsh, “Emerging infrastructures of low-cost aviation in Southeast Asia,” Mobilities, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 259–276, 2017, doi: 10.1080/17450101.2017.1292781. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. V. Vichiensan, V. Wasuntarasook, Y. Hayashi, M. Kii, and T. Prakayaphun, “Urban rail transit in bangkok: Chronological development review and impact on residential property value,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 284, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14010284. [Google Scholar]
  14. W. Wang, J. Liang, and J. Niu, “Site Selection of Co-Working Spaces under the Influence of Multiple Factors: A Case Study in Hangzhou, China,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 5, p. 2676, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14052676. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Parlina, K. Ramli, and H. Murfi, “Exposing emerging trends in smart sustainable city research using deep autoencoders-based fuzzy c-means,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1–28, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13052876. [Google Scholar]
  16. Y. M. Rocha, G. A. de Moura, G. A. Desidério, C. H. de Oliveira, F. D. Lourenço, and L. D. de Figueiredo Nicolete, “The impact of fake news on social media and its influence on health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review,” J. Public Health (Bangkok)., vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1007–1016, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10389-021-01658-z. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Ahmad and R. Jolly, “Big Data Manipulation- A new concern to the ICT world (A massive Survey/statistics along with the necessity),” Int. J. Eng. Appl. Sci., vol. 4, no. 5, p. 257468, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  18. E. P. Purnomo et al., “How Public Transportation Use Social Media Platform during Covid-19: Study on Jakarta Public Transportations’ Twitter Accounts?,” Webology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2021, doi: 10.14704/WEB/V18I1/WEB18001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. H. Lawelai, A. Sadat, A. Suherman, Agustiyara, and A. Nurmandi, “Trend Analysis of Public Enthusiasm for COVID-19 Vaccines on Social Media,” Studies in Media and Communication, vol. 10, no. 2. pp. 105–114, 2022. doi: 10.11114/smc.v10i2.5603. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. H. Lawelai, A. Sadat, and A. Suherman, “Democracy and Freedom of Opinion in Social Media: Sentiment Analysis on Twitter,” PRAJA J. Ilm. Pemerintah., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 40–48, 2022, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.umsrappang.ac.id/praja/article/view/585 [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Sadat, H. Lawelai, and A. Suherman, “Sentiment Analysis on Social Media: Hate Speech to the Government on Twitter,” PRAJA J. Ilm. Pemerintah., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 69–76, 2022, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.umsrappang.ac.id/praja/article/view/584 [Google Scholar]
  22. P. D. König and G. Wenzelburger, “The legitimacy gap of algorithmic decision-making in the public sector: Why it arises and how to address it,” Technol. Soc., vol. 67, p. 101688, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Matheus, M. Janssen, and D. Maheshwari, “Data science empowering the public: Data-driven dashboards for transparent and accountable decision-making in smart cities,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 37, no. 3, p. 101284, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2018.01.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Z. Tomor, A. Meijer, A. Michels, and S. Geertman, “Smart Governance For Sustainable Cities: Findings from a Systematic Literature Review,” J. Urban Technol., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 3–27, 2019, doi: 10.1080/10630732.2019.1651178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. I. Bouzguenda, C. Alalouch, and N. Fava, “Towards smart sustainable cities: A review of the role digital citizen participation could play in advancing social sustainability,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 50, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101627. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. H. Lawelai, I. Iswanto, and N. M. Raharja, “Use of Artificial Intelligence in Public Services : A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization,” TEM J., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 798–807, 2023, doi: 10.18421/TEM122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Macke, J. A. Rubim Sarate, and S. de Atayde Moschen, “Smart sustainable cities evaluation and sense of community,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 239, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118103. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. A. A. Kutty, G. M. Abdella, M. Kucukvar, N. C. Onat, and M. Bulu, “A system thinking approach for harmonizing smart and sustainable city initiatives with United Nations sustainable development goals,” Sustain. Dev., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1347–1365, 2020, doi: 10.1002/sd.2088. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.