EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 440 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 440 (2023) 04010 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 440, 2023
International Conference on Environment and Smart Society (ICEnSO 2023)
Article Number 04010
Number of page(s) 10
Section Legal Issues and Regulation in Smart Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344004010
Published online 01 November 2023
  1. O. S. Al-Mushayt, “Automating E-Government Services with Artificial Intelligence,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 146821–146829, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2946204. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Kassen, “Blockchain and e-government innovation: Automation of public information processes,” Inf. Syst., vol. 103, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.is.2021.101862. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Kurniawan, I. Pratama, T. Purnawingsih, U. P.-I. J. of Artificial, and U. 2022, “Measuring Smart City Implementation to Improve the Quality of Public Services in Jambi City,” Ijair.Id, vol. 0, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.29099/ijair.v6i1.405. [Google Scholar]
  4. D. Afrizal and M. Wallang, “Attitude on intention to use e-government in Indonesia,” Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 435–441, 2021, doi: 10.11591/ijeecs.v22.i1.pp435-441. [Google Scholar]
  5. T. A. Cahyono and T. D. Susanto, “Acceptance factors and user design of mobile e-government website (Study case e-government website in Indonesia),” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 161, pp. 90–98, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.103. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Alshehri, S. Drew, T. Alhussain, and R. Alghamdi, “The effects of website quality on adoption of E-Government service: An empirical study applying UTAUT model using SEM,” ACIS 2012 Proc. 23rd Australas. Conf. Inf. Syst., no. 2011, pp. 1–13, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  7. I. K. Mensah, “Impact of Government Capacity and E-Government Performance on the Adoption of E-Government Services,” Int. J. Public Adm., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 303–311, 2020, doi: 10.1080/01900692.2019.1628059. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. D. Geneiatakis, Y. Soupionis, G. Steri, I. Kounelis, R. Neisse, and I. Nai-Fovino, “Blockchain Performance Analysis for Supporting Cross-Border E-Government Services,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 1310–1322, 2020, doi: 10.1109/TEM.2020.2979325. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. I. Farida, R. Setiawan, A. S. Maryatmi, and N. Juwita, “The Implementation of E-Government in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0 in Indonesia,” Int. J. Progress. Sci. Technol. (IJPSAT, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 340–346, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://ijpsat.ijsht-journals.org. [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Iqbal, U. Pribadi, and Y. Elianda, “Factors affecting the citizen to use e-report application in Gunungkidul Regency,” Smart Cities Reg. Dev. J., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 27–39, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Androniceanu, J. Kinnunen, and I. Georgescu, “E-government clusters in the eu based on the gaussian mixture models,” Adm. si Manag. Public, vol. 2020, no. 35, pp. 6–20, 2020, doi: 10.24818/amp/2020.35-01. [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Pérez-Morote, C. Pontones-Rosa, and M. Núñez-Chicharro, “The effects of e-government evaluation, trust and the digital divide in the levels of e-government use in European countries,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 154, no. February, p. 119973, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119973. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. I. K. Mensah, P. Vera, and J. Mi, “Factors Determining the Use of E-Government Services,” Int. J. E-Adoption, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–19, 2018, doi: 10.4018/ijea.2018070101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. G. P. Dias, “Determinants of e-government implementation at the local level: an empirical model,” Online Inf. Rev., vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 1307–1326, 2020, doi: 10.1108/OIR-04-2020-0148. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. R. A. Saputra, Suprapto, and A. Rachmadi, “Penilaian Kualitas Layanan E-Government Dengan Pendekatan Dimensi EGovqual dan Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) (Studi Kasus Pada Pemerintah Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat),” J. Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 1794–1802, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  16. F. Rindani and S. Puspitodjati, “Integration of Webqual Method to Importance Performance Analysis and Kano Model to Analyze System Quality of E-Government: Case Study LAPOR!,” J. Sist. Inf., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1–17, 2020, doi: 10.21609/jsi.v16i2.937. [Google Scholar]
  17. B. Berlilana, T. Hariguna, and M. T. Lai, “Effects of Relationship Quality on Citizen Intention Use of E-government Services: An Empirical Study of E-government System,” Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng., vol. 8, no. 6, p. 5127, 2018, doi: 10.11591/ijece.v8i6.pp5127-5133. [Google Scholar]
  18. M. A. Almaiah and Y. Nasereddin, “Factors influencing the adoption of e-government services among Jordanian citizens,” Electron. Gov., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 236–259, 2020, doi: 10.1504/EG.2020.108453. [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Shkarlet, I. Oliychenko, M. Dubyna, M. Ditkovska, and V. Zhovtok, “Comparative analysis of best practices in E-government implementation and use of this experience by developing countries,” Adm. si Manag. Public, vol. 2020, no. 34, pp. 118–136, 2020, doi: 10.24818/amp/2020.34-07. [Google Scholar]
  20. R. M. Widayat, J. S. Aji, and C. Kurniawan, “A Systematic Review of Social Media and Government in the Social Science Discipline,” J. Contemp. Gov. Public Policy, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 59–74, 2023, doi: 10.46507/jcgpp.v4i1.100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. K. Hadullo, R. Oboko, and E. Omwenga, “Factors Affecting Asynchronous E-Learning Quality in Developing Countries. A Qualitative Pre-Study of JKUAT University,” Int. J. Educ. Dev. Using Inf. Commun. Technol., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 152–163, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  22. S. C. Srivastava and T. S. H. Teo, “Information system quality judgment for continued E-government use: Theorizing the role of positive and negative affect,” Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 49, pp. 389–426, 2021, doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.04916. [Google Scholar]
  23. T. A. Oktariyanda and T. Rahaju, “E-government strategy of Surabaya city government through e-rt / rw to improve the quality of public service,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 953, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012161. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Y. M. Khrykov, A. A. Kharkivska, H. F. Ponomarova, and A. D. Uchitel, “Modeling the training system of masters of public service using Web 2.0,” CEUR Workshop Proc., vol. 2643, pp. 237–252, 2020, doi: 10.55056/cte.356. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Y. Yusriadi, A. Sahid, I. Amrullah, A. Azis, and A. A. Rachman, “E-Government-based Bureaucratic Reform in Public Service,” vol. 165, no. Iccsr, pp. 66–70, 2018, doi: 10.2991/iccsr-18.2018.15. [Google Scholar]
  26. Y. Li and H. Shang, “Service quality, perceived value, and citizens’ continuous-use intention regarding e-government: Empirical evidence from China,” Inf. Manag., vol. 57, no. 3, p. 103197, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2019.103197. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. T. Rasool and N. F. Warraich, “Does quality matter: A systematic review of information quality of E-government websites,” ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser., no. April, pp. 433–442, 2018, doi: 10.1145/3209415.3209473. [Google Scholar]
  28. S. K. Sharma, A. Al-Badi, N. P. Rana, and L. Al-Azizi, “Mobile applications in government services (mG-App) from user’s perspectives: A predictive modelling approach,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 557–568, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2018.07.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. M. N. N. Sitokdana, “Evaluation of the Information Quality of E-Government Websites of the Provincial Governments of Eastern Indonesia (Case Study: NTT Province, Maluku, North Maluku, West Papua and Papua),” vol. 100, no. Icoi, pp. 231–241, 2019, doi: 10.2991/icoi-19.2019.40. [Google Scholar]
  30. A. Purwanto, A. Zuiderwijk, and M. Janssen, “Citizens’ Trust in Open Government Data: A Quantitative Study about the Effects of Data Quality, System Quality and Service Quality,” 21st Annu. Int. Conf. Digit. Gov. Res., vol. 20, pp. 310–318, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3396956.3396958. [Google Scholar]
  31. I. K. Mensah, G. Zeng, and C. Luo, “E-Government Services Adoption: An Extension of the Unified Model of Electronic Government Adoption,” SAGE Open, vol. 10, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.1177/2158244020933593. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. M. I. Arias and A. C. G. Maçada, “Digital government for E-government service quality: A literature review,” ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser., pp. 7–17, 2018, doi: 10.1145/3209415.3209422. [Google Scholar]
  33. I. K. Mensah, “Factors Influencing the Intention of University Students to Adopt and Use E-Government Services: An Empirical Evidence in China,” SAGE Open, vol. 9, no. 2, 2019, doi: 10.1177/2158244019855823. [Google Scholar]
  34. R. Matheus and M. Janssen, “A Systematic Literature Study to Unravel Transparency Enabled by Open Government Data: The Window Theory,” Public Perform. Manag. Rev., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 503–534, 2020, doi: 10.1080/15309576.2019.1691025. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. A. Pramiyanti, I. D. Mayangsari, R. Nuraeni, and Y. D. Firdaus, “Public perception on transparency and trust in government information released during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Asian J. Public Opin. Res., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 351–376, 2020, doi: 10.15206/ajpor.2020.8.3.351. [Google Scholar]
  36. A. Hastrida, “Proses Pengelolaan Media Sosial Pemerintah : Manfaat Dan Risiko,” J. Penelit. Komun. dan Opini Publik, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 149–165, 2021, doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.33299/jpkop.25.2.3920. [Google Scholar]
  37. S. G. Grimmelikhuijsen, S. J. Piotrowski, and G. G. Van Ryzin, “Latent transparency and trust in government: Unexpected findings from two survey experiments,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 37, no. 4, p. 101497, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101497. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. S. Kim and J. Lee, “Citizen Participation, Process, and Transparency in Local Government: An Exploratory Study,” Policy Stud. J., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1020–1041, 2019, doi: 10.1111/psj.12236. [Google Scholar]
  39. A. N. Kaoje, K. Nabila, S. Idris, J. A. Gambarawa, and L. I. Ubandawaki, “Integrated Personnel and Payroll Information System (IPPIS) and Transparency in Government Payroll Administration in Nigerian Civil Service: A Unique Approach,” Asian J. Econ. Bus. Account., no. November, pp. 1–8, 2020, doi: 10.9734/ajeba/2020/v19i330303. [Google Scholar]
  40. E. Ruijer, F. Détienne, M. Baker, J. Groff, and A. J. Meijer, “The Politics of Open Government Data: Understanding Organizational Responses to Pressure for More Transparency,” Am. Rev. Public Adm., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 260–274, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0275074019888065. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. C. Chen and M. I. Neshkova, “The effect of fiscal transparency on corruption: A panel cross-country analysis,” Public Adm., vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 226–243, 2020, doi: 10.1111/padm.12620. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. S. Cedric Bizimana, “E-government Readiness Assessment for Government institutions in Burundi,” Int. J. Eur. Stud., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 1, 2020, doi: 10.11648/j.ijes.20200401.11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. M. Sarstedt, J. F. Hair, J. H. Cheah, J. M. Becker, and C. M. Ringle, “How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM,” Australas. Mark. J., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 197–211, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.