Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 441, 2023
2023 International Conference on Clean Energy and Low Carbon Technologies (CELCT 2023)
Article Number 02023
Number of page(s) 4
Section Pollution Control and Low-Carbon Energy Saving Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344102023
Published online 07 November 2023
  1. Miguel A. López-Navarro, Vicent Tortosa-Edo, Vanesa Castán-Broto. Firm-Local community relationships in polluting industrial agglomerations: How firms’ commitment determines residents’ perceptions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 186 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  2. Zwane Talent Thebe, Udimal Thomas Bilaliib, Pakmoni Lariba. Examining the drivers of agricultural carbon emissions in Africa: an application of FMOLS and DOLS approaches. Environmental science and pollution research international 30, 19 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  3. Tian Yun, Yin Min Hao. Remeasurement of agricultural carbon emissions in China: basic status quo, dynamic evolution and space spillover effect. China’s rural Economy, 03 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  4. Ran Jincheng, Su Yang, Hu Jinfeng, Tang Hongsong, Wang Jingjing, Cui Pan. Research on the spatial and temporal characteristics, peak prediction and influencing factors of agricultural carbon emission in Xinjiang. Agricultural Resources and regionalization in China 08, 16–24 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu Huajun, Bao Zhen, and Yang Qian. The distribution dynamics and evolution trend of carbon dioxide emissions in China. Resource Science, 10 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  6. Wu Guoyong, Sun Xiaojun, Yu Fubo, Yang Lisa. Analysis of spatial correlation pattern ofcarbon productivity in Chinese planting industry. Population, resources and environment in China, 30 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  7. Yin Xiyang, Jia Xiaojuan, Li Dongmei. The influence of agricultural industrial agglomeration on agricultural total factor productivity —— Based on the perspective of spatial spillover effect. Agricultural resources and regionalization in China,11 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  8. Johnson J. M. F., Franzluebbers A. J., Weyers S.L. Agricultural opportunities to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Environmental Pollution,150 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  9. Xu Xiaoyu, Dong Huizhong, Pang Min. Analysis of the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics and driving factors of agricultural carbon emission efficiency in the three northeastern provinces. Environmental Management in China, 02 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  10. Gan Tianqi, Liu Mingming, and Zhou Zongyuan. Spatial correlation characteristics of agricultural carbon emissions in China. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 01 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  11. Li Yuanling, Wang Jinlong, Yang Ling. Spatiotemporal characteristics of agricultural carbon emission in Hunan Province based on county scale. Agricultural Resources and regionalization in China, 04, 75–84 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  12. Zheng Yangyang, Luo Jianli. Carbon emission effect of agricultural production efficiency: space overflow and threshold characteristics. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics (Social Science edition) 01, 96–105 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang Hui, Bian Yijie. The dynamic evolution and threshold characteristics of agricultural production efficiency and agricultural carbon emission. Agricultural technology and economy 06, 36–47 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  14. Li Chen, Li Haoyu, Kong Haizheng, Feng Wei. Characteristics of implied carbon emission structure and decomposition of driving factors in China’s fishery production system. Resource Science, 06 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang Baoyi. Study on the structural characteristics of agricultural carbon emission in China. Research Worl 09, 3–10 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu Naidong. Carbon emission structure characteristics and influencing factors of rice production in Jiangsu Province [D]. Tutor: Hu Hao. Nanjing Agricultural University, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  17. Guo Si dai, Qian Yupeng, Zhao Rui. Analysis of agricultural carbon emission efficiency and convergence in western China —— based on SBM- Undesirable model. Rural Economy, 11 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  18. Wu Haoyue, He Yanqiu, Chen Rou. Chinese agricultural carbon emission performance evaluation and random convergence study —— based on SBM- Undesirable model and panel unit root test. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 09 (2017) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.