EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 441 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 441 (2023) 03017 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 441, 2023
2023 International Conference on Clean Energy and Low Carbon Technologies (CELCT 2023)
Article Number 03017
Number of page(s) 9
Section Intelligent Ecological Management and Green Service
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344103017
Published online 07 November 2023
  1. Wang, S., Wang, J.X., & Fan, F. (2021). The hidden mediating role of innovation efficiency in coordinating development of economy and ecological environment: Evidence from 283 Chinese cities. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 28(34), 47668–47684. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Xu, B., Wang, J.X., Guo, M.Y., Lu, J.Y., Li, G.H., & Han, L. (2021). A hybrid demand response mechanism based on real-time incentive and realtime pricing. Energy. 231. [Google Scholar]
  3. El Khatib, S., Galiana, F.D., 2019. Investigating emission regulation policy in the electricity sector:modeling an oligopolistic electricity market under hourly cap-and-trade. Energy Economics. 78: 428–443. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, Z.R., Nie, P.Y., 2020. Implications of a cap- and-trade system for emission reductions under an asymmetric duopoly. Business Strategy and the Environment. 29(8): 3135–3145. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fang, G. C., Tian, L.X., Liu, M.H., Fu, M., Sun, M., 2018. How to optimize the development of carbon trading in China-Enlightenment from evolution rulesof the EU carbon price. Applied Energy. 211: 10391049. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lin, B.Q., Jia, Z.J., 2018. Impact of quota decline scheme of emission trading in China: A dynamic recursive CGE model. Energy. 149: 190–203. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lin, B.Q., Jia, Z.J., 2019. Energy, economic and environmental impact of government fines in China’s carbon trading scheme. Science of The Total Environment. 667: 658–670. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Holland, S.P., Hughes, J.E., Knittel, C.R., Parker, N.C., 2015. Unintended Consequences of Carbon Policies: Transportation Fuels, Land-Use, Emissions, and Innovation. The Energy Journal. 36(3): 35–74. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Du, S.F., Zhu, Y.J., Zhu, Y.G., Tang, W.Z., 2020. Allocation policy considering firm’s time-varying emission reduction in a cap-and-trade system. Annals of Operations Research. 290: 543–565. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Feijoo, F., Das, T.K. 2014. Design of Pareto optimal CO2 cap-and-trade policies for deregulated electricity networks. Applied Energy. 119: 371–383. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. He, P., Dou, G.W., Zhang, W., 2017. Optimal production planning and cap setting under cap-and- trade regulation. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 68(9): 1094–1105. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Li, G., Zheng, H., Ji, X., Li, H.F., 2018. Game theoretical analysis of firms’ operational low-carbon strategy under various cap-and-trade mechanisms. Journal of Cleaner Production. 197: 124–133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Xu, X.Y., Xu, X.P., He, P., 2016. Joint production and pricing decisions for multiple products with cap- and-trade and carbon tax regulations. Journal of Cleaner Production. 112: 4093–4106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Xu, X.P., Yu, Y.G., Dou, G.W., Ruan, X.M., 2022. The choice of cap-and-trade and carbon tax regulations in a cap-dependent carbon trading price setting. Kybernete. 51(8): 2554–2577. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ding, F., Lu, Z.P., Jin, M.F., Sun, L.C., 2022. Manufacturer’s Encroachment and Carbon Emission Reduction Decisions Considering Cap-And-Trade Regulation and Consumers’ Low-Carbon Preference. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19(16). [Google Scholar]
  16. Curtis, E.M., Lee, J.M., 2018. The reallocative and heterogeneous effects of cap-and-trade. Economics Letters. 172: 93–96. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Huang, C., Du, S.F., Wang, B., Tang, W.Z., 2022. Accelerate or hinder it? Manufacturer transformation under competition and carbon emission trading. International Journal of Production Research. 61(18): 6230–6250. [Google Scholar]
  18. Chai, Q.F., Xiao, Z.D., Lai, K.H., Zhou, G.H., 2018. Can carbon cap and trade mechanism be beneficial for remanufacturing? International Journal of Production Economics. 203: 311–321. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hu, X., Yang, Z.J., Sun, J., Zhang, Y.L., 2020. Carbon tax or cap-and-trade: Which is more viable for Chinese remanufacturing industry? Journal of Cleaner Production. 243. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zheng, Y., Zhang, G.X., Zhang, W.W., 2018. A. Duopoly Manufacturers’ Game Model Considering Green Technology Investment under a Cap-And- Trade System. Sustainability. 10(3). [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu, L., Zhang, Z.S., Wang, Z., 2021. Two-Sided matching and game on investing in carbon emission reduction technology under a cap-and-trade system. Journal of Cleaner Production. 282. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yang, W., Pan, Y.C., Ma, J.H. Yang, T.Y., Ke, X., 2020. Effects of allowance allocation rules on green technology investment and product pricing under the cap-and-trade mechanism. Energy Policy. 139. [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang, S.Y., Wang, C.X., Yu, C., 2019. The evolutionary game analysis and simulation with system dynamics of manufacturer’s emissions abatement behavior under cap-and-trade regulation. Applied Mathematics and Computation. 355: 343355. [Google Scholar]
  24. Pan, Y.C., Hussain, J., Liang, X.Y., Ma, J.H., 2021. A duopoly game model for pricing and green technology selection under cap-and-trade scheme. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 153. [Google Scholar]
  25. Chen, W., Ma, Y.K., Bai, C.G., 2021. The Impact of Carbon Emission Quota Allocation Regulations on the Investment of Low-Carbon Technology in Electric Power Industry Under Peak-Valley Price Policy. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bushnell, J. (2003). A mixed complementarity model of hydrothermal electricity competition in the western United States. Operations Research. 51(1): 80–93. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Devine, M. T., & Siddiqui, S. (2023). Strategic investment decisions in an oligopoly with a competitive fringe: An equilibrium problem with equilibrium constraints approach. European Journal of Operational Research. 306(3): 1473–1494. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nie, Q., Zhang, L., Tong, Z., & Hubacek, K. (2022). Strategies for applying carbon trading to the new energy vehicle market in China: An improved evolutionary game analysis for the bus industry. Energy. 259. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.