EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 444 (2023) E3S Web of Conf., 444 (2023) 02021 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 444, 2023
4th International Conference on Agribusiness and Rural Development (IConARD 2023)
Article Number 02021
Number of page(s) 11
Section Agricultural Economic and Business
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344402021
Published online 14 November 2023
  1. A L. Dong. Toward resilient agriculture value chains: challenges and opportunities. Production and Operations Management, 30 (3), 666-675. (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. P. G. Chengappa. Development of agriculture value chains as a strategy for enhancing farmers’ income. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 31(1), 1-12. Complex World (Pittsburgh: Prentice Hall Coy. Ltd) (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Trienekens. Agriculture value chain in developing countries. International Food and Agribusiness Management 4 (2): 51–82. (2011) [Google Scholar]
  4. Manyise, Timothy, and D. Dentoni. “Value chain partnerships and farmer entrepreneurship as balancing ecosystem services: Implications for agri-food systems resilience.” Ecosystem Services 49 (2021): 101279. (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Bellemare. The welfare impacts of contract farming. WorldDev. 40 :1418–1434. Contract Farming Resource Centre (CFRC). (2021). [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Miyata; N. Minot; D. Hu. Impact of contract farming on income: Linking small farmers, packers, and supermarkets in China. World Dev., 37, 1781–1790. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dentoni Dominico, Pascucci Stefano, Bitzer Verena. Cross Sector Partnerships and the Co-Creation of Dynamic Capabilities for Stakeholder Orientation. Journal of Business Ethics 135(1) : 35-53. (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. H. Pisalemo, N. F. L. Waney, L. W. T. Sondak. Analisis Rantai Nilai Tepung Kelapa pada PT. Tropica Cocoprima. Agri-Sosioekonomi. 14 (1) : 169-174 (5 Pages). (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Doppo, Margareta, Lolowang, Tommy, Sondak, Lorraine. Analisis kinerja industri Tepung Kelapa PT.Royal Coconut Kelurahan Saronsong satu Kecamatan Airmadidi Kabupaten Minahasa Utara Sulawesi Utara Indonesia.,” Agrisosioekonomi, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 19-32 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  10. J. M. V. Makatita, R. Kumaat, J. R. Mandei. Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Ekspor Tepung Kelapa Sulawesi Utara. Agri-Sosioekonomi Unsrat. 12 (2A) : 273-282 (9 Pages). (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. P. S. Tombeng, L. R. Rengkung, N. F. L. Waney. Keunggulan Kompetitif Produk Tepung Kelapa pada PT. Putra Karangetang Minahasa Selatan. Agri-Sosioekonomi. 14 (1) : 81-94 (14 Pages) (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Williams, Simon, and Ruth Karen. Agribusiness and the small-scale farmer: A dynamic partnership for development. Routledge (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Aeni. Peranan Kemitraan dalam Rantai Nilai Ubi Jalar di PT.Galih Estetika Indonesia, Kabupaten Kuningan ,Jawa Barat. Institut Pertanian Bogor. (2017) [Google Scholar]
  14. Osei-amponsah C, Paassen AVan, Klerkx L. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences Diagnosing institutional logics in partnerships and how they evolve through institutional bricolage: Insights from soybean and cassava value chains in Ghana. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 84 (October 2017), 13–26.(2018) [Google Scholar]
  15. Da Silva, A. Carlos, and M. Rankin. Contract farming for inclusive market access. Rome: FAO. (2013) [Google Scholar]
  16. C. Eaton, A. Shepherd. Contract Farming: Partnerships for Growth (No. 145); Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy. (2001) [Google Scholar]
  17. Sofyan Sjaf, Ahmad Aulia Arsyad, Afan Ray Mahardika, Rajib Gandi, La Elson, Lukman Hakim, Zessy Ardinal Barlan, Rizki Budi Utami, Badar Muhammad, Sri Anom Amongjati, Sampean, Danang Aria Nugroho, Partnership 4.0: smallholder farmer partnership solutions,Heliyon, Volume 8, Issue 12, 2022. (2022) [Google Scholar]
  18. M., E. G. Rankin, P. Nogales, Santacoloma, N. Mhlanga, and C. Rizzo. Public–Private Partnerships for Agribusiness Development, A Review of International Experiences. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations. (2016) [Google Scholar]
  19. Aeni, AEF. Peranan Kemitraan dalam Rantai Nilai pada PT.Galih Estetika Indonesia.Kabupaten Kuningan Jawa Barat. Thesis IPB (2017) [Google Scholar]
  20. Bjarstig, T. Does collaboration lead the sustainability? A stdy of Public Private Partnership in the Swedish Mountain. Sustainbility 9(10). (2017) [Google Scholar]
  21. Contract Farming Resource Centre (CFRC). [Google Scholar]
  22. Da Silva, C.A.B. The Growing Role of Contract Farming in Agri-Food Systems Development: Drivers, Theory and Practice; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy (2005) [Google Scholar]
  23. A.K. Mishra, A. Kumar, P.K. Joshi, A Dsouza. Cooperatives, contract farming, and farm size: The case of tomato producers in Nepal. Agribusiness 2018, 34, 865–886. (2018) [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Maertens, K.V.Velde. Contract-farming in staple food chains: The case of rice in Benin. World Dev. 2017, 95, 73–87. [CrossRef] (2017) [Google Scholar]
  25. J. Girma, C. Gardebroek. The impact of contracts on organic honey producers’ incomes in southwestern Ethiopia. For. Policy Econ. 2015, 50, 259–268. (2015) [Google Scholar]
  26. C. Saenger, M. Qaim, M. Torero, A. Viceisza. Contract farming and smallholder incentives to produce high quality: Experimental evidence from the Vietnamese dairy sector. Agric. Econ. 2013, 44, 297–308. (2013) [Google Scholar]
  27. Heliawaty, Saadah, Apiaty et al,.Partnership Pattern in Rice Farming. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 681 (2021) 012101 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  28. Azahra, Shabrina Puti, Ahmad Choibar Tridakusumah, Tuti Karyani, and Agriani Hermita Sadeli. Tingkat Kepuasan Petani Mitra Kentang Terhadap Kinerja Kemitraan dengan CV Bumi Agrotecnology (Suatu Kasus Petani Kabupaten Garut). Mimbar Agribisnis: Jurnal Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan Agribisnis 9, no. 2 3262-3272 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Anindita, Anak Agung Riskha, et al. Pola Kemitraan Yayasan Trikaya dalam Pengembangan Usahatani Padi Organik di Subak Purnajaya, Desa Lebih, Kecamatan Gianyar, Kabupaten Gianyar. Jurnal Agribisnis dan Agrowisata (Journal of Agribusiness and Agritourism) 8, no. 2 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  30. Syahfitri, Dwi, Endang Yektiningsih, Sri Widayanti.. Efektivitas Pola Kemitraan PT.Pabrik Gula Cabdi Baru Sidoarjo Jawa Timur dengan Petani. Agridevina: Berkala Ilmiah Agribisnis 7 (2) : 131-141 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  31. Sitinjak, K.B., Soetriono, S. and Kusmiati, A., 2021. Strategi Pengembangan Pola Kemitraan Antara PTPN XII Kebun Kalisanen dengan Mitra Petani. Jurnal Agribisnis 7(2), pp.1-13 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  32. Septarianes, S. and Raharja, S. Upaya Strategi Peningkatan Kinerja Dan Keberlanjutan Rantai PAsik Agroindustri Kopi Robusta di Kabupaten Tanggamus.. Jurnal Teknologi Industri Pertanian, 30(2) (2020) [Google Scholar]
  33. Lubis, F. A., Harisudin, M., & Fajarningsih, R. U. Strategi Pengembangan Agribisnis Cabai Merah di Kabupaten Sleman dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process. AGRARIS: Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development Research, 5(2), 119-128 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ramadhanti, Y. C., Destiarni, R. P., & Muti’ah, D. Model Kemitraan Pada UMKM Jamu Tradisional Madura Melalui Pendekatan Analytical Hierarchy Process. Mimbar Agribisnis, 8(1), 468-479 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  35. Nurpitasari,.D. Strategi Pengembangan Agribisnis Kedelai PT.Lentera Panen Mandiri (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Gadjah Mada) (2018) [Google Scholar]
  36. T. M. Ha, O. J. Bosch, & N. C. Nguyen. Systemic interventions addressing market access challenges of smallholder vegetable farmers in Northern Vietnam. International Journal of Markets and Business Systems, 1(2):136-158 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. ECORYS, Evaluation of the Market Access Partnership Final Report Client: European Commission DG Trade Unit G3 Rotterdam, November 20, (2012) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.