EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 444 (2023) E3S Web of Conf., 444 (2023) 02032 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 444, 2023
4th International Conference on Agribusiness and Rural Development (IConARD 2023)
Article Number 02032
Number of page(s) 14
Section Agricultural Economic and Business
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344402032
Published online 14 November 2023
  1. Kementerian Perdagangan, “Monthly Trade Figure (MTF),” (2023) [Google Scholar]
  2. B. I. Tampubolon, Hastuti, M. Firdaus, L. Anggraeni, and N. Muna, “Kinerja Ekspor Indonesia dan Persepsi Konsumen Pakistan terhadap Minyak Sawit dan Produk Turunannya,” Bul. Ilm. Litbang Perdagang., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 41–58, (2022) [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Ulfah, R. H. Ismono, and K. Murniati, “The Export Performance of Indonesia’s Palm Oil in International Market,” J. Manaj. dan Agribisnis, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 140–150, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Nupueng, P. Oosterveer, and A. P. J. Mol, “Global and local sustainable certification systems: Factors influencing RSPO and Thai-GAP adoption by oil palm smallholder farmers in Thailand,” Environ. Dev. Sustain., no. 0123456789, (2022) [Google Scholar]
  5. W. Rodthong, J. K. M. Kuwornu, A. Datta, A. K. Anal, and T. W. Tsusaka, “Factors Influencing the Intensity of Adoption of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil Practices by Smallholder Farmers in Thailand,” Environ. Manage., vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 377–394, (2020) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. E. Apriani, Y. S. Kim, L. A. Fisher, and H. Baral, “Non-state certification of smallholders for sustainable palm oil in Sumatra, Indonesia,” Land use policy, vol. 99, p. 105112, (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Hutabarat and K. Binawidya, “Sertifikasi ISPO dan Daya Saing Kelapa Sawit Indonesia di Pasar Global Tantangan Perkebunan Rakyat Menghadapi Sertifikasi ISPO,” Agro Ekon., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 170–188, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  8. Muliadi, Nurliza, and A. Suharyani, “Proses Informasi Dan Komunikasi Sosial Petani Swadaya Untuk Mengadopsi ISPO (Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil) Di Kabupaten Sambas,” J. Ekon. Pertan. dan Agribisnis, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 240–250, (2023) [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Sabinus, E. Yurisinthae, and S. Oktoriana, “Implementasi Sertifikasi Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil System (Ispo) Pada Petani Kelapa Sawit Swadaya Di Kabupaten Sanggau,” JSEP (Journal Soc. Agric. Econ., vol. 14, no. 2, p. 166, (2021) [Google Scholar]
  10. W. Indriyadi, “Palm Oil Plantation in Indonesia: A Question of Sustainability,” Salus Cult. J. Pembang. Mns. dan Kebud., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–10, (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. E. I. K. Putri et al., “The Oil Palm Governance: Challenges of Sustainability Policy in Indonesia,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 3, (2022) [Google Scholar]
  12. A. H. Dharmawan et al., “Kesiapan Petani Kelapa Sawit Swadaya dalam Implementasi ISPO: Persoalan Lingkungan Hidup, Legalitas dan Keberlanjutan,” J. Ilmu Lingkung., vol. 17, no. 2, p. 304, (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. E. Fahamsyah and E. P. Pramudya, “Sistem ISPO untuk Menjawab Tantangan dalam Masy. Indones., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 65–79, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  14. N. A. Majid, Z. Ramli, S. M. Sum, and A. H. Awang, “Sustainable palm oil certification scheme frameworks and impacts: A systematic literature review,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 6, (2021) [Google Scholar]
  15. N. K. Hidayat, A. Offermans, and P. Glasbergen, “Sustainable palm oil as a public responsibility? On the governance capacity of Indonesian Standard for Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO),” Agric. Human Values, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 223–242, (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. T. Ningsih, I. L. Sibuea, A. Y. Nungroho, Cholish, and Abdullah, “Kajian Penerapan Sistem Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO - ISPO) Secara Terintegrasi Di PT. Bakrie Sumatera Plantations, TBK.,” in Konferensi Nasional Sosial dan Engineering Politeknik Negeri Medan, (2021) [Google Scholar]
  17. F. Isharyadi, U. Ayuningtyas, B. D. Tampubolon, D. R. Wahono, and N. Aliyah, “The challenges of sustainable palm oil product development in Indonesia against consumer demand,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 828, no. 1, (2021) [Google Scholar]
  18. N. Nurliza and Fauyan, “Behavioral Changes of Independent Palm Smallholders Farmers through Farmer Institution,” J. Penyul., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–11, (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. G. Churchill and D. Iacobucci, Marketing research: Methodological foundations, vol. 3. (2002) [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Firdaus, Ekonometrika: Suatu Pendekatan Aplikatif. Bumi Aksara, (2021) [Google Scholar]
  21. D. Fahmi, Persepsi: Bagaimana Sejatinya Persepsi Membentuk Konstruksi Berpikir Kita. Anak Hebat Indonesia, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  22. V. Lowndes and M. Lemprière, “Understanding Variation in Processes of Institutional Formation,” Polit. Stud., vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 226–244, (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Soekartawi, J. L. Dillon, and J. B. Hardaker, “Prinsip dasar ekonomi pertanian,” Rajagrafindo Persada, Jakarta, (2002) [Google Scholar]
  24. D. Pannell, G. Marshall, N. Barr, A. Curtis, F. Vanclay, and R. Wilkinson, “Understanding and Promoting Adoption of Conservation Practices by Rural Landholders,” Aust. J. Exp. Agric. - AUST J EXP AGR, vol. 46, Jan. (2006) [Google Scholar]
  25. K. Suratiyah, ILMU USAHATANI. Penebar Swadaya Grup, (2006) [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Edwina and E. Maharani, “Persepsi Petani terhadap Teknologi Pengolahan Pakan di Kecamatan Kerinci Kanan Kabupaten Siak,” Indones. J. Agric. Econ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 169–183, (2010) [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Jirgi, R. Oluwafemi, and A. Oseghale, “Empirical Review Of Women Participation In Some Agricultural Sub-Sectors Of The Globe,” J. Agripreneursh. Sustain. Dev., vol. 3, pp. 163–171, Sep. (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.