EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 444 (2023) E3S Web of Conf., 444 (2023) 02040 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 444, 2023
4th International Conference on Agribusiness and Rural Development (IConARD 2023)
Article Number 02040
Number of page(s) 9
Section Agricultural Economic and Business
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344402040
Published online 14 November 2023
  1. Suriana, N. Bawang Bawa Untung Budidaya Bawang Merah dan Bawang Putih. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka. (2011). [Google Scholar]
  2. Pranata, A., & Umam, A. T. PENGARUH HARGA BAWANG MERAH TERHADAP PRODUKSI BAWANG MERAH DI JAWA TENGAH. JEJAK, 8(1). (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kementerian Pertanian. Outlook Bawang Merah 2016. Pusat Data dan Sistem Informasi Pertanian Kementerian Pertanian, 21. (2016). [Google Scholar]
  4. BAPPENAS. Rencana pembangunan jangka menengah bidang pangan dan pertanian 2015-2019, 1–419. (2015). [Google Scholar]
  5. Dillon, J. L., & Scandizzo, P. L. Risk Attitudes of Subsistence Farmers in Northeast Brazil: A Sampling Approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60(3), 425–435. (1978). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rusmadi. Pengaruh Sikap Petani Terhadap Risiko dalam Upaya Pengembangan Komoditas Kedelai (Studi Kasus di Desa Ngabar Kabupaten Pasuruan, Jawa Timur). Universitas Gadjah Mada. (1992). [Google Scholar]
  7. Mutisari, R., & Meitasari, D. Analisis Risiko Produksi Usahatani Bawang Merah di Kota Batu. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis, 3(3), 655–662. (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mufriantie, F., & Suhatmini. Analisis risiko berbagai pola tanam pada lahan sawah di Kecamatan Cangkringan Kabupaten Sleman. Universitas Gadjah Mada. (2014). [Google Scholar]
  9. Lawalata, M. Risiko Usahatani Bawang Merah di Kabupaten Bantul. JURNAL AGRICA, 10(2), 56. (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Binswanger, Empirical Estimation and Use of Risk Preferences: Discussion. American Journal Of Agricultural Economics. Vol 64 Issue 2. Page 391-393. (1982). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Erny, Darwanto, D. H., Masyhuri, & Waluyati, L. R. Farmer’s behavior towards lembah Palu shallot farm risks in central Sulawesi, Indonesia. EurAsian Journal of BioSciences, 13(2), 931–936. (2019). [Google Scholar]
  12. Sabrani, M. Perilaku petani ternak domba dalam alokasi sumber daya :: Studi kasus di Mijen dan Klepu, Jawa Tengah. Universitas Gadjah Mada. (1989). [Google Scholar]
  13. Sriyadi. Risiko Usahatani. Yogyakarta: Lembaga Penelitian, Publikasi dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LP3M) UMY. (2014). [Google Scholar]
  14. Gulo, W. Metodologi penelitian. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia. (2012). [Google Scholar]
  15. Nasution, S. Metode Research (penelitian ilmiah). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. (2010). [Google Scholar]
  16. Sugiyono. Metode penelitian pendidikan:(pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D). Bandung: Alfabeta. (2014). [Google Scholar]
  17. Scott, J.C. “The Economy of Peasant Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia”. Yale University Press. London. (1997). [Google Scholar]
  18. Istiyanti, E. “Analisis Pendapatan dan Perilaku Petani Terhadap Risiko dalam Pengembangan Usahatani Bawang Merah (Studi Kasus di Kecamatan Panjatan Kabupaten Kulon Progo)”. Thesis Ekonomi Pertanian Program Pasca Sarjana UGM. (1999). [Google Scholar]
  19. Pujiharto, & Wahyuni, S. Analisis Perilaku Petani Terhadap Risiko Usahatani Sayuran Dataran Tinggi : Penerapan Moscardi and De Janvry Model. AGRITECH: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian, 19(1), 65–73. (2017). [Google Scholar]
  20. Damaijati, E. “Studi Tentang Perilaku Petani Terhadap Risiko Serta Hubungannya dengan Pengambilan Kredit pada Usahatani Kedelai”. Thesis Ekonomi Pertanian Program Pasca Sarjana UGM Yogyakarta. (1992). [Google Scholar]
  21. Juarini. “Perilaku Ekonomi Petani terhadap Risiko Usahatani di Lahan Pantai Kabupaten Kulon Progo”. Disertasi Ekonomi Pertanian Pasca sarjana UGM. Yogyakarta. (2003). [Google Scholar]
  22. Anderson, J.R. and Griffiths, W.E. “Production Risk and Efficient Allocation of Resources” Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 26, (3). p.226-232. (1982). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sri Hindarti, Arief Joko Saputro, and Lia Rohmatul Maula. 2023. Social Economic Factors Affecting The Technical Inefficiency Of Shallots In Malang District. Vol 7 (1): 39-47, March (2023) [Google Scholar]
  24. Triyono, Muhammad Fauzan, Jamilatul Mu’awanah, and Muliati Sedek. 2021. Production Factor Efficiency of Shallot Farming in Pati, Central Java, Indonesia. E3S Web of Conferences 316, 02036 (2021) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  25. Suswadi, Agung Prasetyo, and Dewi Gesang Nurlarasati. Efficiency Of Production Factors Used In Carrot (Daucus carota) Farming. Journal of Biodiversity and Biotechnology. 2(1), 33–38, (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Arifin, Zaenal., Edy Prasetyo., and Bambang Mulyatno Setiawan. 2020. Analysis Of Technical And Economic Efficiency Of The Use Of Production Factors At Cabbage Farming In Getasan District Semarang Regency. International Journal of Humanities, Religion and Social Science. Volume 4, Issue 1, February (2020). [Google Scholar]
  27. Galuh Pawitri, Kustopo Budiraharjo and Bambang Mulyatno Setiawan. The Production Efficiency in Organic Rice Farming. SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 15, No. 3, September 2021, Page 450 – 457. (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Riswan; Suparmin; and Muhamad Siddik. Efficiency Analysis of Cabbage Production in Lombok Island. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding. Volume 9, Issue 6 June, 2022 Pages: 302-313. (2022). [Google Scholar]
  29. Titik Wahyuningsih, Agnes Quartina Pudjiastuti and Sumarno. Production Factors Efficiency Of Potato Farming In Tosari Village. SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 14, No. 3, September 2020, page 511-520. (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Deo Leko Pudaka, Rusdarti, and P. Eko Prasetyo. Efficency Analysis of Rice Production and Farmers' Income in Sengah Temila District Landak Regency. Journal of Economic Education 7 (1) 31 – 38 (2018). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.