EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 446 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 446 (2023) 03005 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 446, 2023
2nd International Conference on High-Speed Transport Development (HSTD 2023)
Article Number 03005
Number of page(s) 7
Section Design, Strength, New Materials
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344603005
Published online 10 November 2023
  1. Yates, E. C., Jr. (1987) ‘Agard standard aeroelastic configurations for dynamic response. candidate configuration i.-wing 445.6’. [Google Scholar]
  2. Yerokhin, A., Deniskin, Y. Airfoil smoothing using unconditional optimization. AS (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-023-00232-7. [Google Scholar]
  3. Strizhius, V.E., Turbin, N.V. Fatigue strength estimates for composite wing panels of prospective supersonic transport aircraft. AS (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-023-00210-z. [Google Scholar]
  4. Yurkovich, R., “Status of unsteady aerodynamic prediction for flutter of high-performance aircraft”, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 40, No. 5, 2003, pp. 832–842. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. McCain, W. E., “Measured and calculated airloads on a transport wing model”, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 22, No. 4, 1985, pp. 336–342 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zenkevich O. (1975) Finite element method in technology. - M: Mir. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fershing G. (1984) Aeroelasticity Basics. - Μ.: Mechanical engineering. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gordnier, R.E. and Melville, R.B., “Transonic flutter simulations using an implicit aeroelastic solver”, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 37, No. 5, 2000, pp. 872–879. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Silva, P.A.S., Morais, M.V.G. Fluid Structure Interaction on AgARD 445.6 wing at Mach 0.9 Proceedings of the XXXVII Iberian Latin-American Congress on Computational Methods in Engineering Suzana Moreira Avila (Editor), ABMEC, Braslia, DF, Brazil, November 6-9, 2016 [Google Scholar]
  10. Guo Tongqing. A CFD/CSD model for aeroelastic calculations of large-scale wind turbines. Science China Technological Sciences, January 2012, 56(1). [Google Scholar]
  11. Lee-Rausch, E. M. & Batina, J. T., 1993. ‘Calculation of agard wing 445.6 flutter using navier-stokes aerodynamics’, AIAA paper pp. 3476, 9–11. [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Ozcatalbas, B. Acar and S. Uslu, Investigation of Aeroelastic Stability on AGARD 445.6 Wing at Transonic Regime. 2018 9th International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (ICMAE), Budapest, Hungary, 2018, pp. 565–569, DOI: 10.1109/ICMAE.2018.8467693. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Yates, E. C., “AGARD standard aeroelastic configurations for dynamic response I-wing 445.6”, AGARD Report 765, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Group for Aerospace Research and Development, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  14. Badcock, K. J., Woodgate, M. A. and Richards, B. E., “Direct aeroelastic bifurcation analysis of a symmetric wing based on the Euler equations”, Technical Report 0315, Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Glasgow, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kamakoti, R., Shyy, W., 2004. ‘Fluid-structure interaction for aeroelastic applications’, Progress in Aerospace Sciences pp. 40,8,535–558. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.