EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 448 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 448 (2023) 01003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 448, 2023
The 8th International Conference on Energy, Environment, Epidemiology and Information System (ICENIS 2023)
Article Number 01003
Number of page(s) 10
Section Multidisciplinary
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344801003
Published online 17 November 2023
  1. Ashley DuVal. History of Forensic Psychology. https://forensicpsych.umwblogs.orghttps://forensicpsych.umwblogs.org/research/criminal-justice/fingerprint-analysis/ (2014). [Google Scholar]
  2. Arshad, H., Jantan, A. Bin & Abiodun, O. I. Digital forensics: Review of issues in scientific validation of digital evidence. J. Inf. Process. Syst. 14, 346–376 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  3. Krivchenkov, A., Misnevs, B. & Pavlyuk, D. Intelligent methods in digital forensics: State of the art. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems vol. 68 (Springer International Publishing, 2019). [Google Scholar]
  4. Casey, E. The chequered past and risky future of digital forensics. Aust. J. Forensic Sci. 51, 649–664 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hughes, N. & Karabiyik, U. Towards reliable digital forensics investigations through measurement science. WIREs Forensic Sci. 2, 1–11 (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Henseler, H. & van Loenhout, S. Educating judges, prosecutors and lawyers in the use of digital forensic experts. DFRWS 2018 EU - Proc. 5th Annu. DFRWS Eur. 24, S76–S82 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  7. Nikkel, B. Fintech forensics: Criminal investigation and digital evidence in financial technologies. Forensic Sci. Int. Digit. Investig. 33, 200908 (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Arshad, H., Jantan, A. & Omolara, E. Evidence collection and forensics on social networks: Research challenges and directions. Digit. Investig. 28, 126–138 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ayangbekun, O. J., Bankole, O. F. & Saka, B. A. Analysis of security mechanisms in Nigeria E-banking platform. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 4, 837–847 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  10. Ariffin, K. A. Z. & Ahmad, F. H. Indicators for maturity and readiness for digital forensic investigation in era of industrial revolution 4.0. Comput. Secur. 105, 102237 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bankole, F., Taiwo, A. & Claims, I. An extended digital forensic readiness and maturity model. Forensic Sci. Int. Digit. Investig. 40, (2022). [Google Scholar]
  12. Seigfried-Spellar, K. C., Rogers, M. & Crimmins, D. M. Development of A Professional Code of Ethics in Digital Forensics. Annu. ADFSL Conf. Digit. Forensics, Secur. Law 9, 15 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  13. Neale, C., Kennedy, I., Price, B., Yu, Y. & Nuseibeh, B. The case for Zero Trust Digital Forensics. Forensic Sci. Int. Digit. Investig. 40, 301352 (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. NIST. Zero Trust Architecture. Control. Priv. Use Data Assets 127–134 (2022) doi:10.1201/9781003189664-11. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kitchenham, B. Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews, Version 1.0. Empir. Softw. Eng. 33, 1–26 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  16. Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L. & van Eck, N. J. Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. J. Informetr. 10, 1178–1195 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Blackley, J. A., Peltier, T. R. & Peltier, J. Information Security Fundamentals. (Taylor & Francis, 2004). [Google Scholar]
  18. Tian, J., Wang, H. & Wang, M. Data integrity auditing for secure cloud storage using user behavior prediction. Comput. Secur. 105, (2021). [Google Scholar]
  19. Balogun, A. M. & Zuva, T. Open Ethical Issues in Digital Forensic Systems. Int. J. Ebus. eGoverment Stud. 9, 55–69 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  20. Park, S., Akatyev, N., Jang, Y., Hwang, J., Kim, D., Yu, W., Shin, H., Han, C., & Kim, J. A comparative study on data protection legislations and government standards to implement Digital Forensic Readiness as mandatory requirement. Digit. Investig. 24, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  21. Ferguson, R. I., Renaud, K., Wilford, S. & Irons, A. PRECEPT: a framework for ethical digital forensics investigations. J. Intellect. Cap. 21, 257–290 (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Horsman, G. Conducting a ‘manual examination’ of a device as part of a digital investigation. Forensic Sci. Int. Digit. Investig. 40, 301331 (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.