EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 448 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 448 (2023) 01009 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 448, 2023
The 8th International Conference on Energy, Environment, Epidemiology and Information System (ICENIS 2023)
Article Number 01009
Number of page(s) 10
Section Multidisciplinary
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344801009
Published online 17 November 2023
  1. P. I. J. Wouters and J. M. J. Bos, “Traffic accident reduction by monitoring driver behaviour with in-car data recorders,” Accid. Anal. Prev., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 643–650, 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(99)00095-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. T. Özkan, T. Lajunen, J. El Chliaoutakis, D. Parker, and H. Summala, “Cross-cultural differences in driving behaviours: A comparison of six countries,” Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 227–242, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2006.01.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Y. Oktopianto and S. Pangesty, “Analisis Daerah Lokasi Rawan Kecelakaan Jalan Tol Tangerang-Merak,” J. Keselam. Transp. Jalan (Indonesian J. Road Safety), vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 26–37, 2021, doi: 10.46447/ktj.v8i1.301. [Google Scholar]
  4. F. Andy, “Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Perilaku Safety Driving Pada Pengemudi Mobil Pengangkut Semen Curah Di PT. Prima Karya Manunggal (Pkm) Kab. Pangket Tahun 2013,” p. 82, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://digilib.unhas.ac.id/uploaded_files/temporary/DigitalCollection/NTBmZTc5NTdlNjUwYzZmYzliZjRiOWQzY2FmZmNjNzY2OWM5Njk5OA==.pdf [Google Scholar]
  5. I. Fuady, M. A. Ramadhani, A. Puspita, K. Rosyidah, and R. N. Dzalaludin, “Penerapan Perluasan Teori Perilaku Berencana: Memahami Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Intensi Perilaku Tertib Lalu Lintas di Kalangan Mahasiswa,” J. Ilm. Ilmu Sos., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 70, 2020, doi: 10.23887/jiis.v6i2.25787. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. M. A. Dalvie, H. A. Rother, and L. London, “Chemical hazard communication comprehensibility in South Africa: Safety implications for the adoption of the globally harmonised system of classification and labelling of chemicals,” Saf. Sci., vol. 61, pp. 51–58, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.07.013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Sardi, “GHS: Keselamatan Berbicara Melalui Simbol,” Bioscience, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 01, 2018, doi: 10.24036/02018219843-0-00. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. E. Boelhouwer, J. Davis, A. Franco-Watkins, N. Dorris, and C. Lungu, “Comprehension of hazard communication: Effects of pictograms on safety data sheets and labels,” J. Safety Res., vol. 46, pp. 145–155, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2013.06.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. W. Han and J. Zhao, “Driver behaviour and traffic accident involvement among professional urban bus drivers in China,” Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., vol. 74, pp. 184–197, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2020.08.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. N. S. Rosli, J. M. Yunus, and S. A. Hanan, “Testing The Driving Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ) on Malaysian Drivers,” 12th Malaysian Univ. Transp. Res. Forum Conf., vol. 15, no. January 2017, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  11. C. Tan, Y. Shi, L. Bai, K. Tang, K. Suzuki, and H. Nakamura, “Modeling effects of driver safety attitudes on traffic violations in China using the theory of planned behavior,” IATSS Res., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 63–72, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.iatssr.2022.02.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jumadil, Hakzah, and Mustakim, “Analisis Keselamatan Lalu Lintas Berdasarkan Pemahaman Berkendara Terhadap Simbol Rambu Lalu Lintas (Studi Kasus: Data’E, Lainungan, Kabupaten Sidenreng Rappang),” J. Karajata Eng., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2022, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.umpar.ac.id/index.php/karajata [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. F. Suwarto, H. Hartono, and L. Lukman, “Pengaruh Rasa Takut Terhadap Profil Perilaku Pengendara Usia Remaja - Studi Dengan Driver Behaviour Questionnaire (DBQ),” J. Rekayasa Sipil, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 129, 2019, doi: 10.25077/jrs.15.2.129-139.2019. [Google Scholar]
  14. L. Guého, M. A. Granié, and J. C. Abric, “French validation of a new version of the Driver Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ) for drivers of all ages and level of experiences,” Accid. Anal. Prev., vol. 63, pp. 41–48, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.024. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. L. M. Martinussen, L. Hakamies-Blomqvist, M. Møller, T. Özkan, and T. Lajunen, “Age, gender, mileage and the DBQ: The validity of the Driver Behavior Questionnaire in different driver groups,” Accid. Anal. Prev., vol. 52, pp. 228–236, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.036. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. C. Chakhtoura and D. Pojani, “Indicator-based evaluation of sustainable transport plans: A framework for Paris and other large cities,” Transp. Policy, vol. 50, pp. 15–28, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.05.014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Zhou, “Sustainable transportation in the US: A review of proposals, policies, and programs since 2000,” Front. Archit. Res., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 150–165, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.foar.2012.02.012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.