EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 448 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 448 (2023) 02007 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 448, 2023
The 8th International Conference on Energy, Environment, Epidemiology and Information System (ICENIS 2023)
Article Number 02007
Number of page(s) 7
Section Information System
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344802007
Published online 17 November 2023
  1. W. S. Lin, H. R. Chen, and M. L. Yang, “How do we learn to get success together through crowdfunding platform? From the perspectives of system learning and multi-motivations,” Telematics and Informatics, vol. 52, no. April, p. 101428, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101428. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. V. Ndou, P. Scorrano, G. Mele, and P. Stefanizzi, “Fundraising activities and digitalization: defining risk indicators for evaluating equity crowdfunding campaigns,” Meditari Accountancy Research, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1169–1190, 2022, doi: 10.1108/MEDAR-03-2021-1237. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. F. di Pietro, M. L. A. M. Bogers, and A. Prencipe, “Organisational barriers and bridges to crowd openness in equity crowdfunding,” Technol Forecast Soc Change, vol. 162, no. September 2020, p. 120388, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120388. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Octaviani, P. I. Pamesti, and B. Heradhyaksa, “Review of Equity Crowdfunding Practices through Santara.id in the Perspective of Islamic Economic Law,” Al-Ahkam, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 161–182, 2021, doi: 10.21580/ahkam.2021.31.2.9014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Wessel, F. Thies, and A. Benlian, “The role of prototype fidelity in technology crowdfunding,” J Bus Ventur, vol. 37, no. 4, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2022.106220. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. W. S. Lee and S. Y. Sohn, “Discovering emerging business ideas based on crowdfunded software projects,” Decis Support Syst, vol. 116, no. April 2018, pp. 102–113, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2018.10.013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. C. Troise and M. Tani, “Exploring entrepreneurial characteristics, motivations and behaviours in equity crowdfunding: some evidence from Italy,” Management Decision, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 995–1024, 2020, doi: 10.1108/MD-10-2019-1431. [Google Scholar]
  8. C. Troise, M. Tani, J. Dinsmore, and G. Schiuma, “Understanding the implications of equity crowdfunding on sustainability-oriented innovation and changes in agri-food systems: Insights into an open innovation approach,” Technol Forecast Soc Change, vol. 171, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120959. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Belleflamme, N. Omrani, and M. Peitz, “The economics of crowdfunding platforms,” Information Economics and Policy, vol. 33, pp. 11–28, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2015.08.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. H. W. Chesbrough, Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press, 2003. [Online]. Available: https://www.ptonline.com/articles/how-to-get-better-mfi-results [Google Scholar]
  11. H. Shin and R. R. Perdue, “Developing creative service ideas through hotel customer engagement for open innovation: Focused on empowerment and motivation processes,” Int J Hosp Manag, vol. 100, no. November 2021, p. 103077, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.103077. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. J. R. Saura, D. Palacios-Marqués, and D. Ribeiro-Soriano, “Exploring the boundaries of open innovation: Evidence from social media mining,” Technovation, no. December 2021, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102447. [Google Scholar]
  13. F. S. Tsai, S. Cabrilo, H. H. Chou, F. Hu, and A. D. Tang, “Open innovation and SME performance: The roles of reverse knowledge sharing and stakeholder relationships,” J Bus Res, vol. 148, no. March, pp. 433–443, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.051. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. V. Stefanelli, G. B. Ferilli, and V. Boscia, “Exploring the lending business crowdfunding to support SMEs’ financing decisions,” Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 100278, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100278. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Ferretti, V. Venturelli, and A. Pedrazzoli, “Do multiple competing offerings on a crowdfunding platform influence investment behavior?,” J Behav Exp Finance, vol. 30, p. 100506, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100506. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Presenza, T. Abbate, F. Cesaroni, and F. P. Appio, “Enacting Social Crowdfunding Business Ecosystems: The case of the platform Meridonare,” Technol Forecast Soc Change, vol. 143, no. July 2017, pp. 190–201, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.03.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. V. Butticè and S. Vismara, “Inclusive digital finance: the industry of equity crowdfunding,” Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1224–1241, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10961-021-09875-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. W. Yuspin and N. Rohmah Wati, “The Urgency of a Legal Protection on Equity Crowdfunding Services Based on the Regulation of the Indonesian Financial Service Authority No. 57/POJK.04/2020,” International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 412, 2022, doi: 10.18415/ijmmu.v9i2.3536. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. B. D. Audretsch and M. Belitski, “The limits to open innovation and its impact on innovation performance,” Technovation, no. March, p. 102519, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102519. [Google Scholar]
  20. F. R. da S. Meireles, A. C. Azevedo, and J. M. G. Boaventura, “Open innovation and collaboration: A systematic literature review,” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M, vol. 65, no. February 2021, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2022.101702. [Google Scholar]
  21. I. Shaikh and K. Randhawa, “Managing the risks and motivations of technology managers in open innovation: Bringing stakeholder-centric corporate governance into focus,” Technovation, vol. 114, no. July 2020, p. 102437, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102437. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. R. H. A. J. Ogink, M. C. Goossen, A. G. L. Romme, and H. Akkermans, “Mechanisms in open innovation: A review and synthesis of the literature,” Technovation, no. August, p. 102621, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102621. [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Aagaard and F. Rezac, “Governing the interplay of inter-organizational relationship mechanisms in open innovation projects across ecosystems,” Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 105, no. December 2020, pp. 131–146, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.06.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Jingyao, Z. Gang, and Z. Ling, “Governance mechanisms implementation in the evolution of digital platforms: a case study of the Internet of Things platform,” R and D Management, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 498–516, 2022, doi: 10.1111/radm.12494. [Google Scholar]
  25. J. Cenamor, V. Parida, and J. Wincent, “How entrepreneurial SMEs compete through digital platforms: The roles of digital platform capability, network capability and ambidexterity,” J Bus Res, vol. 100, no. December 2018, pp. 196–206, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.035. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Ahmed, S. H. Bhatti, I. Gölgeci, and A. Arslan, “Digital platform capability and organizational agility of emerging market manufacturing SMEs: The mediating role of intellectual capital and the moderating role of environmental dynamism,” Technol Forecast Soc Change, vol. 177, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121513. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. L. Chen, J. Yi, S. Li, and T. W. Tong, “Platform Governance Design in Platform Ecosystems: Implications for Complementors’ Multihoming Decision,” J Manage, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 630–656, 2022, doi: 10.1177/0149206320988337. [Google Scholar]
  28. M. Jovanovic, D. Sjödin, and V. Parida, “Co-evolution of platform architecture, platform services, and platform governance: Expanding the platform value of industrial digital platforms,” Technovation, vol. 118, no. November 2020, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. H. A. Ofe and J. Sandberg, “The emergence of digital ecosystem governance: An investigation of responses to disrupted resource control in the Swedish public transport sector,” Information Systems Journal, no. June 2022, pp. 350–384, 2022, doi: 10.1111/isj.12404. [Google Scholar]
  30. H. A. Islam, M. Farrell, A. Nair, and J. Zhang, “Understanding transaction platform governance and conflicts: A configuration approach,” Technol Forecast Soc Change, vol. 189, no. April 2022, p. 122382, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122382. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. A. K. Singal, “Designing platform ecosystems for collaboration, innovation and growth,” Benchmarking, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 2806–2821, 2022, doi: 10.1108/BIJ-12-2020-0619. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. T. Guggenberger, B. Schellinger, V. von Wachter, and N. Urbach, Kickstarting blockchain: designing blockchain-based tokens for equity crowdfunding, no. 0123456789. Springer US, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s10660-022-09634-9. [Google Scholar]
  33. N. Ibrahim and Verliyantina, “The Model of Crowdfunding to Support Small and Micro Businesses in Indonesia Through a Web-based Platform,” Procedia Economics and Finance, vol. 4, no. Icsmed, pp. 390–397, 2012, doi: 10.1016/s2212-5671(12)00353-x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. C. Song, J. Luo, K. Holtta-Otto, W. Seering, and K. Otto, “Crowdfunding for Design Innovation: Prediction Model With Critical Factors,” IEEE Trans Eng Manag, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 1565–1576, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TEM.2020.3001764. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. M. Ahlfänger, H. G. Gemünden, and J. Leker, “Balancing knowledge sharing with protecting: The efficacy of formal control in open innovation projects,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 105–119, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.09.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. A. Cavallo, H. Burgers, A. Ghezzi, and V. van de Vrande, “The evolving nature of open innovation governance: A study of a digital platform development in collaboration with a big science centre,” Technovation, vol. 116, no. July 2021, p. 102370, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102370. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.