EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 448 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 448 (2023) 02039 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 448, 2023
The 8th International Conference on Energy, Environment, Epidemiology and Information System (ICENIS 2023)
Article Number 02039
Number of page(s) 10
Section Information System
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344802039
Published online 17 November 2023
  1. S. Kotusev, The History of Enterprise Architecture: An Evidence-Based Review, Journal of Enterprise Architecture. 12. 29 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  2. Information and Communication Technology Strategic Plan Ministry of Finance 2014-2025, Jakarta, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  3. Q. Bui, M.L. Markus, S. Newell, Alternative Designs In Widespread Innovation Adoption: Empirical Evidence From Enterprise Architecture Implementation In US State Governments, ICIS 2015, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Lahtela, P. Kortelainen, Government Enterprise Architecture in Practice, in: Proceedings of the European Conference on E-Government, ECEG, (2014): pp. 414–421. [Google Scholar]
  5. Laporan Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Asesmen Kapabilitas EA Kemenkeu Tahun 2022, (2022). [Google Scholar]
  6. Open Group, The TOGAF ® Standard, Version 9.2, The Open Group, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Kotusev, A Comparison of the Top Four Enterprise Architecture Frameworks, British Computer Society. (2021). [Google Scholar]
  8. Keputusan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 512 Tahun 2021 tentang Enterprise Architecture Kementerian Keuangan, Indonesia, (2021). [Google Scholar]
  9. World-Class Enterprise Architecture, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  10. B.D. Rouhani, R.B. Ahmad, F. Nikpay, R. Mohamaddoust, Critical success factor model for enterprise architecture implementation, Malaysian Journal of Computer Science. 32, 133–148 (2019). https://doi.org/10.22452/mjcs.vol32no2.4 . [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. T. Ylimäki, Toward Critical Success Factors For Enterprise Architecture, (2006). [Google Scholar]
  12. V. Seppänen, From Problems to Critical Success Factors of Enterprise Architecture Adoption, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Lange, J. Mendling, J. Recker, An Empirical Analysis of The Factors and Measures of Enterprise Architecture Management success, European Journal of Information Systems. 25, 411–431 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.39 . [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Pattij, R. van de Wetering, R. Kusters, Enhanced Digital Transformation Supporting Capabilities Through Enterprise Architecture Management: A fsQCA Perspective, Digital Business. 2, (2022). [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Palfreyman, J. Morton, The Benefits of Agile Digital Transformation to Innovation Processes, Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation. 6, 26–36 (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. D. Ellström, J. Holtström, E. Berg, C. Josefsson, Dynamic Capabilities for Digital Transformation, Journal of Strategy and Management. 15, 272–286 (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. H. Zhang, Q. Zhang, How Does Digital Transformation Facilitate Enterprise Total Factor Productivity? The Multiple Mediators of Supplier Concentration and Customer Concentration, Sustainability (Switzerland). 15 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Bansal, T. Panchal, F. Jabeen, S.K. Mangla, G. Singh, A Study of Human Resource Digital Transformation (HRDT): A Phenomenon of Innovation Capability Led By Digital And Individual Factors, J Bus Res. 157 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Sony, J. Antony, G.L. Tortorella, Critical Success Factors for Successful Implementation of Healthcare 4.0: A Literature Review and Future Research Agenda, Int J Environ Res Public Health. 20 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054669 . [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. F. Kitsios, M. Kamariotou, A. Mavromatis, Drivers and Outcomes of Digital Transformation: The Case of Public Sector Services, Information (Switzerland). 14 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  21. F.E. Yulianto, M.H. Darmawan, A.S. Budi, W.J. Setiaji, E.T. Ariefianto, N.P. Ernawan, A.R. Muchtar, Navigasi Transformasi di Tengah Pandemi Laporan Tahunan Program Reformasi Birokrasi dan Transformasi Kelembagaan 2021, (2021). [Google Scholar]
  22. B. Lin, Y. Xie, Does Digital Transformation Improve The Operational Efficiency Of Chinese Power Enterprises, Util Policy. 82 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  23. Z. Ji, T. Zhou, Q. Zhang, The Impact of Digital Transformation on Corporate Sustainability: Evidence from Listed Companies in China, Sustainability (Switzerland). 15 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032117 . [Google Scholar]
  24. G. Zhang, T. Wang, Y. Wang, S. Zhang, W. Lin, Z. Dou, H. Du, Study on the Influencing Factors of Digital Transformation of Construction Enterprises from the Perspective of Dual Effects—A Hybrid Approach Based on PLS-SEM and fsQCA, Sustainability (Switzerland). 15 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076317 . [Google Scholar]
  25. P. Chen, S.K. Kim, The Impact of Digital Transformation On Innovation Performance - The Mediating Role of Innovation Factors, Heliyon. 9 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Sarstedt, C.M. Ringle, J.F. Hair, Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling, in: Handbook of Market Research, Springer International Publishing, (2021): pp. 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-2 . [Google Scholar]
  27. K. Kwong, K. Wong, Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) Techniques Using SmartPLS, Marketing Bulletin. 24 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  28. J.F. Hair, G.T.M. Hult, C.M. Ringle, Marko. Sarstedt, A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), SAGE, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  29. L. Garis, C. Squires, D. Plecas, The Essentials of Leadership in Government Understanding The BASICS, University of the Fraser Valley, (2018). http://cjr.ufv.ca . [Google Scholar]
  30. V. Venkatesh, S.A. Brown, H. Bala, Bridging The Qualitative-Quantitative Devide: Guideline For Conducting Mixed Methods Research In Information System, MIS Quarterly. 37, 21–54 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.