EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 448 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 448 (2023) 02060 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 448, 2023
The 8th International Conference on Energy, Environment, Epidemiology and Information System (ICENIS 2023)
Article Number 02060
Number of page(s) 10
Section Information System
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344802060
Published online 17 November 2023
  1. I. Yaqoob, I.A.T. Hashem, A. Gani, S. Mokhtar, E. Ahmed, N.B. Anuar, A. Vasilakos, V Big data: From beginning to future, Int. J. Inf. Manage., 36, 1231–1247 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. W. Brass, Demographic Data Analysis in Less Developed Countries: 1946–1996, Popul. Stud. (NY), 50, 451–467 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Hidayat, Kekacauan Bansos Corona, Masalah Klasik Big Data (2022, Feb) Retrieved from https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20200508133813-20-501305/kekacauan-bansos-corona-masalah-klasik-big-data [Google Scholar]
  4. A.P. Wijaya, J.H. Hong, Quantitative assessment of social vulnerability for landslide disaster risk reduction using gis approach (case study: Cilacap regency, province of central Java, Indonesia), In Proceedings of the International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, 42 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Probosiwi, Unemployment and Its Influence on Poverty Level, J. Penelit. Kesejaht. Sos., 15, 89–100 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  6. Ridwan Ego Sektoral, Penyebab Belum Terintegrasi Basis Data Kependudukan (2022, Feb) Retrieved from https://www.dpr.go.id/berita/detail/id/35098/t/Ego+Sektoral%2C+Penyebab+Belum+Terintegrasi+Basis+Data+Kependudukan [Google Scholar]
  7. I.N. Gregory, P.S. Ell, Error‐sensitive historical GIS: Identifying areal interpolation errors in time‐series data, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 20, 135–152 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. L. Gong, W. Fan, (David) Modeling single-vehicle run-off-road crash severity in rural areas: Accounting for unobserved heterogeneity and age difference, Accid. Anal. Prev., 101, 124–134 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. T.B. Pedersen, C.S. Jensen, Multidimensional database technology, Computer (Long. Beach. Calif.), 34, 40–46 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Chaudhuri, U. Dayal, An Overview of Data Warehousing and OLAP Technology, SIGMOD Rec., 26, 65–74 (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. H. Hongke, Q. Linhai, Application and Research of Multidimensional Data Analysis in Power Quality, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Design and Applications (ICCDA), IEEE Xplore (2010) [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Li, L. Meng, F.Z. Wang, W. Zhang, Y. Cai, A Map-Reduce-enabled SOLAP cube for large-scale remotely sensed data aggregation, Comput. Geosci., 70, 110–119 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. G. Cao, S. Wang, M. Hwang, A. Padmanabhan, Z. Zhang, K. Soltani, A scalable framework for spatiotemporal analysis of location-based social media data, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst., 51, 70–82 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Z. Xu, J. Lee, D. Park, Y. Chung, Multidimensional analysis model for highly pathogenic avian influenza using data cube and data mining techniques, Biosyst. Eng., 157, 109–121 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Kienberger, T. Blaschke, Rukhe, Z. Zaidi, A framework for spatio-temporal scales and concepts from different disciplines: the “vulnerability cube.” Nat. Hazards, 68, 1343–1369 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. C.S. Jensen, T.B. Pedersen, C. Thomsen, Multidimensional Databases and Data Warehousing, Özsu, M.T. (University ofWaterloo), Ed., Morgan & Claypool Publishers series, 2 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. K. Morfonios, S. Konakas, Y. Ioannidis, N. Kotsis, ROLAP Implementations of the Data Cube, ACM Comput. Surv., 39, 12–es (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Y. Zhang, X. Kunqing, M. Xiujun, X. Dan, C. Cuo, T. Shiwei, Spatial data cube: provides better support for spatial data mining, In Proceedings of the International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, (IGARSS ’05), IEEE: Seoul (2005) [Google Scholar]
  19. P. Gatalsky, N. Andrienko, G. Andrienko, Interactive analysis of event data using space-time cube. In Proceedings of the Proceedings, Eighth International Conference on Information Visualisation, 2004., 2004, 145–152 (IV, 2004) [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Deville, C. Linard, S. Martin, M. Gilbert, F.R. Stevens, A.E. Gaughan, V.D. Blondel, A.J. Tatem, Dynamic population mapping using mobile phone data, 111, 15888–15893 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Bimonte, A. Tchounikine, M. Miquel, Towards a Spatial Multidimensional Model, Proceedings of the 8th ACM international workshop on Data warehousing and OLAP: Bremen Germany (2005) [Google Scholar]
  22. T. Sboui, Y. Bédard, J. Brodeur, T. Badard, A conceptual framework to support semantic interoperability of geospatial datacubes. In Proceedings of the International conference on conceptual modeling: Advances in conceptual modeling - Foundations and Applications, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg: Auckland, New Zealand, 4802 LNCS, 378–387 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Y. Sismanis, A. Deligiannakis, Y. Kotidis, N. Roussopoulos, Hierarchical Dwarfs for the Rollup Cube. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP, Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 17–24 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Lande, S. Engen, B. E. Saether, F. Filli, E. Matthysen, H. Weimerskirch, Estimating Density Dependence from Population Time Series Using Demographic Theory and Life‐History Data, Am. Nat., 159, 321–337 (2002) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. P.M. Yelland, Rolling Up Random Variables in Data Cubes (2013) [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Rodrigues, A Comprehensive Review on OLAP Models and operations, 2 (2017) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.