EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 448 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 448 (2023) 03028 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 448, 2023
The 8th International Conference on Energy, Environment, Epidemiology and Information System (ICENIS 2023)
Article Number 03028
Number of page(s) 25
Section Environment Science
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344803028
Published online 17 November 2023
  1. Nyi Linn Maung, Kawasaki A, AmrithS. Spatial and temporal impacts on socio-economic conditions in the Yangon slums. Habitat Int [Internet]. 2023;134:102768. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397523000280 [Google Scholar]
  2. Winarso H. Slum-upgrading trough physical or socio-economic improvement? lessons from Bandung, Indonesia. J Hous Built Environ [Internet]. 2022;37(2):863–87. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-021-09859-4 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Roitman S, Rukmana D. Urban Indonesia: Challenges and Opportunities. Routledge Handb Urban Indones. 2023;3–14. [Google Scholar]
  4. UN-Habitat. World Cities Report 2022: Envisaging the Future of Cities. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat). 2022. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lilford R, Kyobutungi C, Ndugwa R, Sartori J, Watson SI, Sliuzas R, et al. Because space matters: Conceptual framework to help distinguish slum from non-slum urban areas. BMJ Glob Heal. 2019;4(2). [Google Scholar]
  6. UN Habitat. Expert Group Meeting on Urban Indicators Secure Tenure, Slums and Global Sample of Cities [Internet]. Nairobi; 2002 [cited 2016 Sep 11]. Available from: http://www.citiesalliance.org/sites/citiesalliance.org/files/expert-group-meeting-urban-indicators%5B1%5D.pdf [Google Scholar]
  7. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. State of the world’s cities : harmonious cities. EaGOSscan; 2008. 264 p. [Google Scholar]
  8. Takyi SA, Amponsah O, Yeboah AS, Mantey E. Locational analysis of slums and the effects of slum dweller’s activities on the social, economic and ecological facets of the city: insights from Kumasi in Ghana. GeoJournal [Internet]. 2021;86(6):2467–81. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10196-2 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Galiani S, Gertler PJ, Undurraga R, Cooper R, Martínez S, Ross A. Shelter from the storm: Upgrading housing infrastructure in Latin American slums. J Urban Econ. 2017;98:187–213. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kesztenbaum L, Rosenthal JL. Sewers’ diffusion and the decline of mortality: The case of Paris, 1880–1914. J Urban Econ [Internet]. 2017;98:174–86. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2016.03.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hussain T, Abbas J, Wei Z, Nurunnabi M. The effect of sustainable urban planning and slum disamenity on the value of neighboring residential property: Application of the hedonic pricing model in rent price appraisal. Sustain. 2019;11(4):1–20. [Google Scholar]
  12. Harari M, Wong M. Slum Upgrading and Long-run Urban Development: Evidence from Indonesia. Soc Econ Dyn [Internet]. 2018;367:75. Available from: https://economicdynamics.org/meetpapers/2018/paper_367.pdf [Google Scholar]
  13. Henderson JV, Regan T, Venables AJ. Building the City: From Slums to a Modern Metropolis. Rev Econ Stud. 2021;88(3):1157–92. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ghifari MN Al, Firdausan SZ. Perilaku Masyarakat pada Ruang Terbuka Publik di Kampung Kebangsren Surabaya. Sinektika J Arsit. 2020;16(2):80–6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hakim R. Unsur Perancangan Dalam Arsitektur Lansekap, Jakarta: PT. Bina Aksara. 1987; [Google Scholar]
  16. Diep L, Dodman D, Parikh P. Green Infrastructure in informal settlements through a multiple-level perspective. Water Altern. 2019;12(2):554–70. [Google Scholar]
  17. Adegun OB. Green infrastructure in relation to informal urban settlements. J Archit Urban. 2017;41(1):22–33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Birtchnell T, Gill N, Sultana R. Sleeper cells for urban green infrastructure: Harnessing latent competence in greening Dhaka’s slums. Urban For Urban Green [Internet]. 2019;40(May):93–104. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.05.014 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Douglas I. The challenge of urban poverty for the use of green infrastructure on floodplains and wetlands to reduce flood impacts in intertropical Africa. Landsc Urban Plan [Internet]. 2018;180:262–72. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.025 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Adegun OB. Green Infrastructure Can Improve the Lives of Slum Dwellers in African Cities. Front Sustain Cities. 2021;3(March):1–4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ali MJ, Rahaman M, Hossain SI. Urban green spaces for elderly human health: A planning model for healthy city living. Land use policy [Internet]. 2022;114:105970. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837721006931 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gupta K, Puntambekar K, Roy A, Pandey K, Mahavir, Kumar P. Smart environment through smart tools and technologies for urban green spaces: Case study: Chandigarh, India [Internet]. Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements. Springer Singapore; 2020. 149–194 p. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6822-6_5 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lahoti S, Lahoti A, Joshi RK, Saito O. Vegetation structure, species composition, and carbon sink potential of urban green spaces in Nagpur City, India. Land. 2020;9(4):1–20. [Google Scholar]
  24. Strohbach MW, Haase D. Above-ground carbon storage by urban trees in Leipzig, Germany: Analysis of patterns in a European city. Landsc Urban Plan [Internet]. 2012;104(1):95–104. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Amoatey P, Sulaiman H, Kwarteng A, Al-Reasi HA. Above-ground carbon dynamics in different arid urban green spaces. Environ EaGOS Sci [Internet]. 2018;77(12):0. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7613-1 [Google Scholar]
  26. Yao ZY, Liu JJ, Zhao XW, Long DF, Wang L. Spatial dynamics of aboveground carbon stock in urban green space: a case study of Xi’an, China. J Arid Land. 2015;7(3):350–60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Veitch J, Abbott G, Kaczynski AT, Wilhelm Stanis SA, Besenyi GM, Lamb KE. Park availability and physical activity, TV time, and overweight and obesity among women: Findings from Australia and the United States. Health Place [Internet]. 2016;38:96–102. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353829216000071 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Xie B, An Z, Zheng Y, Li Z. Healthy aging with parks: Association between park accessibility and the health status of older adults in urban China. Sustain Cities Soc [Internet]. 2018;43:476–86. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221067071831196X [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Engemann K, Pedersen CB, Arge L, Tsirogiannis C, Mortensen PB, Svenning JC. Residential green space in childhood is associated with lower risk of psychiatric disorders from adolescence into adulthood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(11):5188–93. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Asibey MO, Yeboah V, Poku-Boansi M, Bamfo C. Exploring the use, behaviour and role of urbanites towards management and sustainability of Kumasi Rattray Park, Ghana. J Urban Manag [Internet]. 2019;8(2):182–94. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2018.12.003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Jennings V, Bamkole O. The relationship between social cohesion and urban green space: An avenue for health promotion. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(3). [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhou X, Rana MMP. Social benefits of urban green space: A conceptual framework of valuation and accessibility measurements. Manag Environ Qual. 2012;23(2):173–89. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kruizse H, van der Vliet N, Staatsen B, Bell R, Chiabai A, Muiños G, et al. Urban green space: creating a triple win for environmental sustainability, health, and health equity through behavior change. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(22). [Google Scholar]
  34. Li L, Zheng Y, Ma S. Links of urban green space on environmental satisfaction: a spatial and temporarily varying approach. Environ Dev Sustain [Internet]. 2023;25(4):3469–501. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02175-z [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Turner-Skoff JB, Cavender N. The benefits of trees for livable and sustainable communities. Plants People Planet. 2019;1(4):323–35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Van Zoest J, Hopman M. Taking the economic benefits of green space into account: The story of the Dutch TEEB for Cities project. Urban Clim [Internet]. 2014;7:107–14. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2014.01.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang XJ. Analysis of problems in urban green space system planning in China. J For Res. 2009;20(1):79–82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Rupprecht CDD, Byrne JA, Ueda H, Lo AY. “It’s real, not fake like a park”: Residents’ perception and use of informal urban green-space in Brisbane, Australia and Sapporo, Japan. Landsc Urban Plan [Internet]. 2015;143:205–18. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  39. Gobster PH, Westphal LM. The human dimensions of urban greenways: Planning for recreation and related experiences. Landsc Urban Plan. 2004;68(2–3):147–65. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Handayani N. PEMILIHAN AREA PENGEMBANGAN RUANG TERBUKA HIJAU MENGGUNAKAN METODE AHP DAN TOPSIS DI KOTA YOGYAKARTA. 2022;3(12):1318–34. [Google Scholar]
  41. Kurniati AC, Zamroni A. Kategorisasi Karakteristik Ruang Terbuka Hijau Publik untuk Menunjang Kenyamanan Kota Yogyakarta. J Ilmu Lingkung. 2021;19(1):127–39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. RPJMD. Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah Kota Yogyakarta. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  43. Damptey FG, Opuni-Frimpong NY, Arimiyaw AW, Bentsi-Enchill F, Wiafe ED, Abeyie BB, et al. Citizen Science Approach for Assessing the Biodiversity and Ecosystem Service Potential of Urban Green Spaces in Ghana. Land. 2022;11(10). [Google Scholar]
  44. Balram S, Dragićević S. Attitudes toward urban green spaces: integrating questionnaire survey and collaborative GIS techniques to improve attitude measurements. Landsc Urban Plan. 2005;71(2–4):147–62. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Dinnie E, Brown KM, Morris S. Reprint of “Community, cooperation and conflict: Negotiating the social well-being benefits of urban greenspace experiences.” Landsc Urban Plan [Internet]. 2013;118:103–11. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.07.011 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Dennis M, James P. User participation in urban green commons: Exploring the links between access, voluntarism, biodiversity and well being. Urban For Urban Green [Internet]. 2016;15:22–31. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.11.009 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Jennings V, Gaither CJ. Approaching environmental health disparities and green spaces: An ecosystem services perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(2):1952–68. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Undang-Undang No. 26 tahun 2007. Undang-Undang No. 26 tahun 2007 tentang Penataan Ruang. Indonesia; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  49. Cobbinah PB, Asibey MO, Zuneidu MA, Erdiaw-Kwasie MO. Accommodating green spaces in cities: Perceptions and attitudes in slums. Cities [Internet]. 2021;111(January). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103094 [Google Scholar]
  50. Shuvo FK, Feng X, Akaraci S, Astell-Burt T. Urban green space and health in low and middle-income countries: A critical review. Urban For Urban Green [Internet]. 2020;52(March):126662. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126662 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wu C, Li J, Wang C, Song C, Haase D, Breuste J, et al. Estimating the Cooling Effect of Pocket Green Space in High Density Urban Areas in Shanghai, China. Front Environ Sci. 2021;9(May):1–14. [Google Scholar]
  52. Lau KKL, Yung CCY, Tan Z. Usage and perception of urban green space of older adults in the high-density city of Hong Kong. Urban For Urban Green [Internet]. 2021;64(July):127251. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127251 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Nath TK, Zhe Han SS, Lechner AM. Urban green space and well-being in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Urban For Urban Green [Internet]. 2018;36:34–41. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866718300815 [Google Scholar]
  54. Fongar C, Aamodt G, Randrup TB, Solfjeld I. Does perceived green space quality matter? Linking norwegian adult perspectives on perceived quality to motivation and frequency of visits. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(13). [Google Scholar]
  55. Xu X, Liu S, Sun S, Zhang W, Liu Y, Lao Z, et al. Evaluation of energy saving potential of an urban green space and its water bodies. Energy Build [Internet]. 2019;188–189:58–70. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.02.003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Morakinyo TE, Lam YF, Hao S. Evaluating the role of green infrastructures on near-road pollutant dispersion and removal: Modelling and measurement. J Environ Manage [Internet]. 2016;182:595–605. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.077 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. Koprowska K, Łaszkiewicz E, Kronenberg J, Marcińczak S. Subjective perception of noise exposure in relation to urban green space availability. Urban For Urban Green [Internet]. 2018;31:93–102. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.01.018 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Gunnarsson B, Knez I, Hedblom M, Sang O. Effects of biodiversity and environment-related attitude on perception of urban green space. Urban Ecosyst [Internet]. 2017;20(1):37–49. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0581-x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. Barnidge EK, Hipp PR, Estlund A, Duggan K, Barnhart KJ, Brownson RC. Association between community garden participation and fruit and vegetable consumption in rural Missouri. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10:1–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Barnidge EK, Baker EA, Schootman M, Motton F, Sawicki M, Rose F. The effect of education plus access on perceived fruit and vegetable consumption in a rural African American community intervention. Health Educ Res. 2014;30(5):773–85. [Google Scholar]
  61. Zezza A, Tasciotti L. Urban agriculture, poverty, and food security: Empirical evidence from a sample of developing countries. Food Policy [Internet]. 2010;35(4):265–73. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.04.007 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. Ghosh-Dastidar B, Cohen D, Hunter G, Zenk SN, Huang C, Beckman R, et al. Distance to store, food prices, and obesity in urban food deserts. Am J Prev Med [Internet]. 2014;47(5):587–95. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.07.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. Dubowitz T, Ncube C, Leuschner K, Tharp-Gilliam S. A Natural Experiment Opportunity in Two Low-Income Urban Food Desert Communities: Research Design, Community Engagement Methods, and Baseline Results. Heal Educ Behav. 2015;42:87–96. [Google Scholar]
  64. Pereira G, Christian H, Foster S, Boruff BJ, Bull F, Knuiman M, et al. The association between neighborhood greenness and weight status: An observational study in PeGOS Western Australia. Environ Heal A Glob Access Sci Source. 2013;12(1):1–9. [Google Scholar]
  65. Al-Delaimy WK, Webb M. Community Gardens as Environmental Health Interventions: Benefits Versus Potential Risks. Curr Environ Heal reports. 2017;4(2):252–65. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. Sillman D, Rigolon A, Browning MHEM, Yoon H (Violet), McAnirlin O. Do sex and gender modify the association between green space and physical health? A systematic review. Environ Res [Internet]. 2022;209:112869. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935122001967 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  67. Ugolini F, Massetti L, Calaza-Martínez P, Cariñanos P, Dobbs C, Ostoic SK, et al. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use and perceptions of urban green space: An international exploratory study. Urban For Urban Green. 2020;56(June). [Google Scholar]
  68. Mamplekou E, Bountziouka V, Psaltopoulou T, Zeimbekis A, Tsakoundakis N, Papaerakleous N, et al. Urban environment, physical inactivity and unhealthy dietary habits correlate to depression among elderly living in eastern mediterranean islands: The MEDIS (Mediterranean Islands Elderly) study. J Nutr Heal Aging. 2010;14(6):449–55. [Google Scholar]
  69. Douglas O, Lennon M, Scott M. Green space benefits for health and well-being: A life-course approach for urban planning, design and management. Cities [Internet]. 2017;66:53–62. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.03.011 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  70. Peters K, Elands B, Buijs A. Social interactions in urban parks: Stimulating social cohesion? Urban For Urban Green [Internet]. 2010;9(2):93–100. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.11.003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  71. Sefcik JS, Kondo MC, Klusaritz H, Sarantschin E, Solomon S, Roepke A, et al. Perceptions of nature and access to green space in four urban neighborhoods. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(13):1–13. [Google Scholar]
  72. Plane J, Klodawsky F. Neighbourhood amenities and health: Examining the significance of a local park. Soc Sci Med [Internet]. 2013;99:1–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.10.008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  73. Kabisch N, Qureshi S, Haase D. Human-environment interactions in urban green spaces - A systematic review of contemporary issues and prospects for future research. Environ Impact Assess Rev [Internet]. 2015;50:25–34. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2014.08.007 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  74. Fam D, Mosley E, Lopes A, Mathieson L, Morison J, G. C. Irrigation of urban green spaces: a review of the environmental, social and economic benefits [Internet]. CRC for Irrigation Futures. 2008. 1–47 p. Available from: https://www.newwaterways.org.au/downloads/Resources - Policy and Guidelines/Water Conservation and Efficiency/CRCWSC Irrigation of urban green spaces.pdf [Google Scholar]
  75. United Nations. The 17 Goals [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2020 Apr 1]. Available from: https://sdgs.un.org/goals [Google Scholar]
  76. Madge C. Public parks and the geography of fear. Tijdschr voor Econ en Soc Geogr. 1997;88(3):237–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  77. Cranz G, Boland M. Defining the Sustainable Park: A Fifth Model for Urban Parks. Landsc J [Internet]. 2004 Jan 1;23(2):102 LP – 120. Available from: http://lj.uwpress.org/content/23/2/102.abstract [Google Scholar]
  78. World Health Organization. Urban green space interventions and health: A review of impacts and effectiveness. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  79. Permen PU No. 18 Tahun 2010. Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum No. 18 Tahun 2010 tentang Pedoman Revitalisasi Kawasan. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  80. Abd El Gawad NS, Al-Hagla KS, Nassar DM. Place making as an approach to revitalize Neglected Urban Open Spaces (NUOS): A case study on Rod El Farag Flyover in Shoubra, Cairo. Alexandria Eng J [Internet]. 2019;58(3):967–76. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2019.08.011 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  81. Molavi M, Mardoukhi Z, Jalili F. Utilization of place-making approach in urban spaces using historic mansions attractions. Theor Empir Res Urban Manag. 2016;11(4):60–73. [Google Scholar]
  82. Severcan YC. The effects of children’s participation in planning and design activities on their place attachment. J Archit Plann Res. 2015;271–93. [Google Scholar]
  83. Wyckoff MA, Neumann B, Pape G, Schindler K. Placemaking as and economic development tool: A placemaking guide. East, L Policy Institute, Michigan State Univ Lansing, MI, USA. 2015; [Google Scholar]
  84. Benedict MA, McMahon ET. Green infrastructure: smart conservation for the 21st century. Renew Resour J. 2002;20(3):12–7. [Google Scholar]
  85. Sari PM. Studi Mengenai Hambatan dan Kesulitan Penerapan Konsep Green Infrastructure. J Magister Tek Sipil. 2015;1–14. [Google Scholar]
  86. Cheshmehzangi A, Griffiths CJ. Development of green infrastructure for the city: a holistic vision towards sustainable urbanism. J Archit Environ. 2014;2(2):13–20. [Google Scholar]
  87. Rachmayanti S, Roesli C. Green design dalam desain interior dan arsitektur. Humaniora. 2014;5(2):930–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  88. Budiyantoputra MIN, Ars S. ATAP PANGGUNG TIUP DENGAN ENERGI SURYA. Penerbit Selaras Media Kreasindo; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  89. Budiasih KS, Si M. Pemanfaatan beberapa tanaman yang berpotensi sebagai bahan anti nyamuk. Univ Negeri Yogyakarta. 2011;20. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.