EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 448 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 448 (2023) 03036 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 448, 2023
The 8th International Conference on Energy, Environment, Epidemiology and Information System (ICENIS 2023)
Article Number 03036
Number of page(s) 16
Section Environment Science
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344803036
Published online 17 November 2023
  1. M. D. Spalding and M. Leal, The State of World’s Mangroves 2022. Global Mangrove Alliance (GMA), 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.mangrovealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/The-State-of-the-Worlds-Mangroves-Report_2022.pdf [Google Scholar]
  2. B. Locatelli, “Ecosystem Services and Climate Change,” in Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services, M. Potschin, R. Haines Young, R. Fish, and R. K. Turner, Eds., London and New York: Routledge, 2016, pp. 481–490. [Online]. Available: www.routledge.com/products/9781138025080. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. V. B. Arifanti et al., “Challenges and Strategies for Sustainable Mangrove Management in Indonesia: A Review,” Forests, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1611600 [Google Scholar]
  4. B. Blankespoor, S. Dasgupta, and G.-M. Lange, “Mangroves as a protection from storm surges in a changing climate,” Ambio, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 478–491, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s13280-016-0838-x. [Google Scholar]
  5. F. Sidik, “Mangrove conservation for climate change mitigation in Indonesia,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, vol. 9, no. 5. 2018. doi: 10.1002/wcc.529. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. F. Wang et al., “Global blue carbon accumulation in tidal wetlands increases with climate change,” Natl. Sci. Rev., vol. 8, no. 9, p. 296, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaa296. [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Y. Chee, M. L. Tan, Y. L. Tew, Y. K. Sim, J. C. Yee, and A. K. M. Chong, “Between the devil and the deep blue sea: Trends, drivers, and impacts of coastal reclamation in Malaysia and way forward,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 858, no. Pt 2, p. 159889, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159889. [Google Scholar]
  8. P. Zhao et al., “Accumulation of nutrients and potentially toxic elements in plants and fishes in restored mangrove ecosystems in South China,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 838, no. Pt 1, p. 155964, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155964. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rosmiati, B. Rauf, and F. Amir, “Attitude of Coastal Communities on Mangrove Forest Management: A Phenomenological Study from Bulukumba Regency, Indonesia,” Asian J. Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.24203/ajas.v10i1.6877. [Google Scholar]
  10. S. P. Meera, M. Bhattacharyya, A. Nizam, and A. Kumar, “A review on microplastic pollution in the mangrove wetlands and microbial strategies for its remediation,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 4865–4879, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17451-0. [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Ritohardoyo, A. A. Akbar, J. Satohardi, and T. S. Djohan, “Public participation in the utilization and rehabilitation of coastal natural resources (case study of coastal erosion in West Kalimantan),” J. Degrad. Min. Lands Manag., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 739–747, 2017, doi: 10.15243/jdmlm.2017.042.739. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. The Word Bank, “Mangrove Conservation and Restoration: Protecting Indonesia’s ‘Climate Guardians,’” The Word Bank, Jul. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2021/07/26/mangrove-conservation-and-restoration-protecting-indonesia-climate-guardians [Google Scholar]
  13. F. Feti, S. P. Hadi, and H. Purnaweni, “Does the intervention of regional authorities contribute to sustainable mangrove eotourism? Case Study on Mangrove Management at Karangsong, West Java,” Ecol. Quest., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 7–14, 2020, doi: 10.12775/EQ.2020.017. [Google Scholar]
  14. J. P. Hochard, E. B. Barbier, and S. E. Hamilton, “Mangroves and coastal topography create economic ‘safe havens’ from tropical storms,” Sci. Rep., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 15359, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94207-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M. W. Kawuryan et al., “Sustainable Tourism Development in Indonesia: Bibliometric Review and Analysis,” Indones. J. Geogr., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 154–166, 2022, doi: 10.22146/ijg.64657. [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Basyuni, “Effect of mangrove rehabilitation on socio-cultural of pulau sembilan society, North Sumatera, Indonesia,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 126, no. 1. 2018. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/126/1/012115. [Google Scholar]
  17. B. A. Polidoro et al., “The Loss of Species: Mangrove Extinction Risk and Geographic Areas of Global Concern,” PLoS One, vol. 5, no. 4, p. e10095, Jan. 2010, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010095. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. IUCN, “The Mangrove Breakthrough: a call to action for a critical ecosystem,” The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Nov. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.iucn.org/story/202211/mangrove-breakthrough-call-action-critical-ecosystem [Google Scholar]
  19. Indonesian Ministry Of Marine Affairs And Fisheries KKP, “Condition of mangroves in Indonesia,” Directorate General of Marine Spatial Management, p. 1, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://kkp.go.id/djprl/p4k/page/4284-kondisi-mangrove-di-indonesia [Google Scholar]
  20. A. R. De Aquino, “Indonesia’s green belt – Protecting and restoring the country’s mangroves,” The Word Bank, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://blogs.worldbank.org/eastasiapacific/indonesias-green-belt-protecting-and-restoring-countrys-mangroves [Google Scholar]
  21. V. B. Arifanti, “Mangrove management and climate change: A review in Indonesia,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 487, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/487/1/012022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. O. Ellegaard and J. A. Wallin, “The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?,” Scientometrics, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 1809–1831, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. J. A. Wallin, “Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities,” Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol., vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 261–275, Nov. 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_139.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. N. J. Van Eck and L. Waltman, Visualizing Bibliometric Networks. 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13. [Google Scholar]
  25. N. J. van Eck and L. Waltman, “Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping,” Scientometrics, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 523–538, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Aria and C. Cuccurullo, “bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis,” J. Informetr., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 959–975, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Y.-S. Ho and S. A. Mukul, “Publication Performance and Trends in Mangrove Forests: A Bibliometric Analysis,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 22. 2021. doi: 10.3390/su132212532. [Google Scholar]
  28. S. Mohd Razali, M. A. Radzi, A. Marin, and Z. Samdin, “A bibliometric analysis of tropical mangrove forest land use change from 2010 to 2020,” Environ. Dev. Sustain., vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 11530–11547, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10668-021-01935-7. [Google Scholar]
  29. M. E. B. Gerona-Daga and S. G. Salmo, “A systematic review of mangrove restoration studies in Southeast Asia: Challenges and opportunities for the United Nation’s Decade on Ecosystem Restoration,” Front. Mar. Sci., vol. 9, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fmars.2022.987737. [Google Scholar]
  30. N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. Marc, “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis : An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 133, no. April, pp. 285–296, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. H. Liao, M. Tang, L. Luo, C. Li, F. Chiclana, and X.-J. Zeng, “A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Medical Big Data Research,” Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 1. 2018. doi: 10.3390/su10010166. [Google Scholar]
  32. G. Rogers, M. Szomszor, and J. Adams, “Sample size in bibliometric analysis,” Scientometrics, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 777–794, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03647-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. F. Carcassi and G. Sbardolini, “Assertion, denial, and the evolution of Boolean operators,” Mind Lang., vol. 1, no. 21, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1111/mila.12448. [Google Scholar]
  34. K. L. Erwin, “Wetlands and global climate change: the role of wetland restoration in a changing world,” Wetl. Ecol. Manag., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 71–84, 2009, doi: 10.1007/s11273-008-9119-1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. C. Chen, “Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature,” J. Data Inf. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–40, 2017, doi: doi:10.1515/jdis-2017-0006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. R. Kleminski, P. Kazienko, and T. Kajdanowicz, “Analysis of direct citation, co-citation and bibliographic coupling in scientific topic identification,” J. Inf. Sci., vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 349–373, 2022, doi: 10.1177/0165551520962775. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. M. Spalding, M. Kainuma, and L. Collins, World atlas of mangroves. Routledge, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. W. Giesen, S. Wulffraat, M. Zieren, and L. Scholten, Mangrove guidebook for Southeast Asia. FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  39. D. C. Donato, J. B. Kauffman, D. Murdiyarso, S. Kurnianto, M. Stidham, and M. Kanninen, “Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics,” Nat. Geosci., vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 293–297, 2011, doi: 10.1038/ngeo1123. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. J. Cooper, “Geomorphology and preservation potential of coastal and submerged aeolianite: Examples from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa,” Geomorphology, vol. 271, pp. 1–12, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.07.028. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. A. Maz-Machado and N. Jiménez-Fanjul, “Collaboration and Citation Analysis Within Social Sciences: A Comparative Analysis Between Two Fields,” M. Jibu and Y. Osabe, Eds., Rijeka: IntechOpen, 2018, p. Ch. 5. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.76732. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.