EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 448 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 448 (2023) 03074 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 448, 2023
The 8th International Conference on Energy, Environment, Epidemiology and Information System (ICENIS 2023)
Article Number 03074
Number of page(s) 13
Section Environment Science
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344803074
Published online 17 November 2023
  1. S. Nakamura and Yasushi. Kondo, Waste input-output analysis : concepts and application to industrial ecology. Springer (2009) [Google Scholar]
  2. Waste: a problem or a resource? — European Environment Agency (2022, June) Retrieved from https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/signals-2014/articles/waste-a-problem-or-a-resource [Google Scholar]
  3. J. J. Klemeš, Y. van Fan, and P. Jiang, Plastics: friends or foes? The circularity and plastic waste footprint, Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects, 43(13), 1549–1565 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. L. Čuček, J. J. Klemeš, and Z. Kravanja, Overview of environmental footprints, in Assessing and Measuring Environmental Impact and Sustainability, Elsevier Inc., 131–193 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  5. R. F. Manegdeg et al., Multi-Attribute Assessment of Waste-to-Energy Technologies for Medical, Industrial, and Electronic Residual Wastes, Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Transactions of the ASME, 144(7) (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. R. H. Roggenbauer, Comparing indoor wastewater-fed aquaculture with two conventional wastewater treatment plants using adopted sustainable process indices, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 12(2), 132–140 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. J. J. Klemeš, Y. van Fan, R. R. Tan, and P. Jiang, Minimising the present and future plastic waste, energy and environmental footprints related to COVID-19, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 127 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  8. I. M. Karp and K. Y. Pyanykh, Municipal solid wastes as energy resourse, Technical Electrodynamics, 2019(6), 49–58 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Holubčík, J. Jandačka, and J. Trnka, Closed Cycle of Biodegradable Wastes in Smart Cities, 59–73, (2023) [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Sakcharoen, C. Ratanatamskul, and A. Chandrachai, Factors affecting technology selection, techno-economic and environmental sustainability assessment of a novel zero-waste system for food waste and wastewater management, Journal of Cleaner Production, 314, 128103 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Moñino et al., A new strategy to maximize organic matter valorization in municipalities: Combination of urban wastewater with kitchen food waste and its treatment with AnMBR technology, Waste Management, 62, 274–289 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Reducing food waste – method for measuring waste quantities (2022, June) Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/2122-Reducing-food-waste-method-for-measuring-waste-quantities_ru [Google Scholar]
  13. Statistics | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2022, June) Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/statistics/en/ [Google Scholar]
  14. FAO Statistical Programme of Work 2020–2021 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Caldeira, V. de Laurentiis, S. Corrado, F. van Holsteijn, and S. Sala, Quantification of food waste per product group along the food supply chain in the European Union: a mass flow analysis, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 149, 479–488 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Eurostat - Data Explorer (2022, June) Retrieved from http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?lang=en&dataset=env_wasgen [Google Scholar]
  17. “PREPARATORY STUDY ON FOOD WASTE ACROSS EU 27,” (2010) [Google Scholar]
  18. Food Waste (2022, June) Retrieved from https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?datasetcode=FOOD_WASTE [Google Scholar]
  19. Trends in Solid Waste Management. (2022, June). Retrieved from https://datatopics.worldbank.org/what-awaste/trends_in_solid_waste_management.html [Google Scholar]
  20. Y. Zhao et al., Is Pyrolysis Technology an Advisable Choice for Municipal Solid Waste Treatment from a Low Carbon Perspective?, Chemical Engineering Journal, 137785 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  21. Z. Fu et al., A comprehensive emission inventory of hazardous air pollutants from municipal solid waste incineration in China, Science of the Total Environment, 826, (2022) [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Satayavibul and C. Ratanatamskul, A novel integrated single-stage anaerobic co-digestion and oxidation ditch-membrane bioreactor system for food waste management and building wastewater recycling, Journal of Environmental Management, 279, 111624 (2021) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. F. Cecchi and C. Cavinato, Smart Approaches to Food Waste Final Disposal, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(16), 2860 (2019) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Y. Hoekstra, Human appropriation of natural capital: A comparison of ecological footprint and water footprint analysis, Ecological Economics, 68(7), 1963–1974 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. K. Hubacek and S. Giljum, Applying physical input–output analysis to estimate land appropriation (ecological footprints) of international trade activities, Ecological Economics, 44(1), 137–151 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Zhao, Z. Li, and W. Li, A modified method of ecological footprint calculation and its application, Ecological Modelling, 185(1), 65–75 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. EconPapers: A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia (2022, July) Retrieved from https://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeecolec/v_3a37_3ay_3a2001_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a229-255.htm [Google Scholar]
  28. R. York, E. A. Rosa, and T. Dietz, The Ecological Footprint Intensity of National Economies, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 8(4), 139–154 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. UCLA Electronic Green Journal Title Our Ecological Footprint: reducing human impact on the earth Permalink Copyright Information (1997) [Google Scholar]
  30. G. R. Mong et al., Waste-to-BioEnergy pathway for waste activated sludge from food processing industries: An experiment on the valorization potential under CO2 and N2 atmospheres through microwave-induced pyrolysis, Fuel, 323, (2022) [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Wackernagel, D. Lin, M. Evans, L. Hanscom, and P. Raven, Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends, 11(7), 2164 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  32. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth by Mathis Wackernagel | Goodreads. (2022, July) Retrieved from https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/318225.Our_Ecological_Footprint [Google Scholar]
  33. M. Lenzen and S. A. Murray, A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia, Ecological Economics, 37, 229–255 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. M. L. Deaton and J. J. Winebrake, Dynamic Modeling of Environmental Systems, Dynamic Modeling of Environmental Systems (2000) [Google Scholar]
  35. G. P. Hammond and B. Li, Environmental and resource burdens associated with world biofuel production out to 2050: footprint components from carbon emissions and land use to waste arisings and water consumption, GCB Bioenergy, 8(5), 894–908, (2016) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.