EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 453 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 453 (2023) 01052 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 453, 2023
International Conference on Sustainable Development Goals (ICSDG 2023)
Article Number 01052
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202345301052
Published online 30 November 2023
  1. Singh, Gurjeet, Pradhan, M. K., and Verma, Ajay. “Multi Response optimization of injection moulding Process parameters to reduce cycle time and warpage.” Materials Today: Proceedings 5.2 (2018): 8398-8405. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Osarenmwinda, J. O., and Olodu, D. D. “Optimization of injection moulding process parameters in the moulding of High Density Polyethylene (HDPE).” Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management 22.2 (2018): 203-206. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahmad, A., Wahab, M. S., Shah, A. S. M., Kamarudin, K., and Hehsan, H. “Optimization of processing parameters for plastic injection moulding process towards moulded part shrinkage.” In AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2129, no. 1. AIP Publishing, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kumar, B. Prasad, Venkataramaiah, P., and Ganesh, J. Siddi. “Optimization of process parameters in injection moulding of a polymer composite product by using gra.” Materials Today: Proceedings 18 (2019): 4637-4647. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kitayama, Satoshi, Tamada, Kanako, Takano, Masahiro, and Aiba, Shuji. “Numerical and experimental investigation on process parameters optimization in plastic injection molding for weldlines reduction and clamping force minimization.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 97 (2018): 2087-2098. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kitayama, Satoshi, Tamada, Kanako, Takano, Masahiro, and Aiba, Shuji. “Numerical optimization of process parameters in plastic injection molding for minimizing weldlines and clamping force using conformal cooling channel.” Journal of Manufacturing Processes 32 (2018): 782-790. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Veeresh Nayak, Patel, C., G. C. Manjunath, Ramesh, M. R., Desai, Vijay, and Samanta, Sudip Kumar. “Analysis and optimization of metal injection moulding process.” Materials Forming, Machining and Post Processing (2020): 41-74. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Usman Jan, Muhammad, Qazi, Habib, Tufail, Noor, Sahar, Abas, Muhammad, Azim, Shakir, and Yaseen, Qazi Muhammad. “Multi response optimization of injection moulding process parameters of polystyrene and polypropylene to minimize surface roughness and shrinkage’s using integrated approach of S/N ratio and composite desirability function.” Cogent Engineering 7, no. 1 (2020): 1781424. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Panneerselvam, Vivekanandan, and Turan, Faiz Mohd. “Multi response optimisation of injection moulding process parameter using Taguchi and desirability function.” In Intelligent Manufacturing and Mechatronics: Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Intelligent Manufacturing and Mechatronics–SympoSIMM 2019, 8 July 2019, Melaka, Malaysia, pp. 252-264. Springer Singapore, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rathi, M. M., and Salunke, Manoj Damodar. “Analysis of injection moulding process parameters.” International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology 1, no. 8 (2012): 1-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mahajan, L. D., and Ulhe, P. N. “Analysis of Injection Molding Process to Reduced Defects (ShortShot).” International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research 5, no. 6 (2018): 113-119. [Google Scholar]
  12. Tsai, Hsi-Hsun, Wu, Shao-Jung, Liu, Jia-Wei, Chen, Sin-He, and Lin, Jui-Jung. “Filling-balance-oriented parameters for multi-cavity molds in polyvinyl chloride injection molding.” Polymers 14, no. 17 (2022): 3483. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mollaei Ardestani, Alireza, Azamirad, Ghasem, Shokrollahi, Yasin, Calaon, Matteom, Hattel, Jesper Henri, Kulahci, Murat, Soltani, Roya, and Tosello, Guido. “Application of Machine Learning for Prediction and Process Optimization—Case Study of Blush Defect in Plastic Injection Molding.” Applied Sciences 13, no. 4 (2023): 2617. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wu, Yirun, Feng, Yiqing, Peng, Shitong, Mao, Zhongfa, and Chen, Bin. “Generative machine learning-based multiobjective process parameter optimization towards energy and quality of injection molding.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30, no. 18 (2023): 51518-51530. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Grosu, Elena. “Applications of polyvinylchloride (PVC)/thermoplastic nano-, micro-and macroblends.” Polyvinylchloride-based Blends: Preparation, Characterization and Applications (2022): 75-89. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mengistie, Awoke. “Improving the process parameteres for optimization of plastic extrusion in UPVC pipe manfacuturing.” PhD diss., 2020. [Google Scholar]
  17. Al-Refaie, Abbas, and Bata, Nour. “PAT Framework to Optimize Performance of Extrusion Process for uPVC Pipes.” In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, vol. 2. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  18. Tang, Jian Wen. “The Optimal Design of Injection Mold Gate Based on CAE.” Advanced Materials Research 690 (2013): 2772-2775. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Titow, W. V., and Turner, L. W. “Injection Moulding of PVC.” PVC technology (1984): 723-741. [Google Scholar]
  20. Dalal, Girish T. “Chlorinated poly (vinyl chloride)(CPVC) engineering thermoplastic now a viable alternative.” Journal of Vinyl Technology 7, no. 1 (1985): 36-41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Paturi, Uma Maheshwera Reddy, Kolluru, Sai Krishna Prashanth, and Kalvakolanu, SDS Abhiram. “Prediction of weld-line width and sink-mark depth of plastic injection moulded parts using neural networks.” Materials Today: Proceedings (2023). [Google Scholar]
  22. Ravikiran, Bammidi, Pradhan, Deepak Kumar, Jeet, Siddharth, Bagal, Dilip Kumar, Barua, Abhishek, and Nayak, Sasmita. “Parametric optimization of plastic injection moulding for FMCG polymer moulding (PMMA) using hybrid Taguchi-WASPAS-Ant Lion optimization algorithm.” Materials Today: Proceedings 56 (2022): 2411-2420. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jeet, Siddharth, Barua, Abhishek, Bagal, Dilip Kumar, Pradhan, Swastik, Panda, Surya Narayan, and Mahapatra, Siba Sankar. “Parametric Investigation of Injection Moulding for LDPE using Capuchin Search Algorithm and Honey Badger Algorithm.” In Advances in Functional and Smart Materials: Select Proceedings of ICFMMP 2021, pp. 481-497. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  24. Pachorkar, Padmakar, Singh, Gurjeet, Agarwal, Neeraj, and Srivastava, Ashish. “Multi response optimization of injection moulding process to reduce sink marks and cycle time.” Materials Today: Proceedings 72 (2023): 10891093. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Milan, Julio CG, Machado, Alisson R., Tomaz, Ítalo V., da Silva, Leonardo R.R., Barbosa, Celso A., Mia, Mozammel, and Pimenov, Danil Yu. “Effects of calcium-treatment of a plastic injection mold steel on the tool wear and power consumption in slot milling.” journal of materials research and technology 13 (2021): 1103-1114. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zabala, B., Fernandez, X., Rodriguez, J. C., López-Ortega, A., Fuentes, E., Bayón, R., Igartua, A., and Girot, F. “Mechanism-based wear models for plastic injection moulds.” Wear 440 (2019): 203105. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Foltuţ, Daniel, Vălean, Estera, Dzitac, Vasile, and Marşavina, Liviu. “The influence of temperature on the mechanical properties of 3D printed and injection molded ABS.” Materials Today: Proceedings 78 (2023): 210-213. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kaur, Satnam, Awasthi, Lalit K., Sangal, A. L., and Dhiman, Gaurav. “Tunicate Swarm Algorithm: A new bioinspired based metaheuristic paradigm for global optimization.” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 90 (2020): 103541. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.