EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 457 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 457 (2023) 02020 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 457, 2023
International Scientific and Practical Symposium “The Future of the Construction Industry: Challenges and Development Prospects” (FCI-2023)
Article Number 02020
Number of page(s) 11
Section Integrated Safety in Construction
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202345702020
Published online 05 December 2023
  1. Seed H.B., Idriss I.M. Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential // Journal of Soil Mechanics & Foundations Div, Vol. 97, No. 9, 1971. pp. 1249–1273. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Seed H.B., Peackock W.H. Test procedures for measuring soil liquefaction characteristics // Journal of SoilMechanics & Foundations Div, 1971. pp. 1099–1119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Iwasaki T., Tokida K.I., Tatsuoka F., Watanabe S., Yasuda S., Sato H. Microzonation for soil liquefaction potential using simplified methods // Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Microzonation. Seattle, Wash, USA. 1982. pp. 1310–1330. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sentsova E.A., Nikitin M.S., Voznesensky E.A. Sandy soils dynamic strength parameters according to triaxial tests // Engineering Geology World, Vol. XIV, No. 2, 2019. pp. 24–33, https://doi.org/10.25296/1993-5056-2019-14-2-24-33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Voznesensky E.A., Kushnareva E.S. Seismic liquefaction of soils: engineering evaluation and classification// Engineering Geology World, Vol. 2, 2012. pp. 11–23. [Google Scholar]
  6. Abramova T.T., Voznesensky E.A. Modern methods of managing propeties of soils on the sites exposed to high dynamic loads // Geotechnics, Vol. 4, 2015. pp. 6–25. [Google Scholar]
  7. Abaramova T.T., Valieva K.E. Complex issues of technogenic safety, Proceedings of international research and practice conference // Overivew of modern technologies aimed and lowering dynamic impact on soils. Voronezh, Russia. 2017. pp. 33–37. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ter-Martirosyan A.Z., Sobolev E.S. Dynamic problems of scientific support construction // IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 869, 2020. pp. Art. No. 072011, DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/869/7/072011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ter-Martirosyan A.Z., Sobolev E.S. Analysis of the seismic stability of foundations according to laboratory soil tests // VII International Scientific Conference Integration, Partnership and Innovation in Construction Science and Education (IPICSE 2020). Tashkent, Uzbekistan. 2021. Vol. 1030. pp. Art. No. 012032, https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1030/1Z012032. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kumar S., Murali Krishna A., Dey A. Dynamic soil properties of Brahmaputra sand using Cyclic Triaxial tests // North-East Students Geo-Congress on Advances in Geotechnical Engineering (NESGC 2014). Guwahati, India. 2014. pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kundu A., Patra N.R., Bandyopadhyay S., Reddy G.R. Static and dynamic characterization and response analysis of soils from northern India // SN Applied Sciences, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2021. pp. Art. No. 205, DOI: 10.1007/s42452-021-04196-1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ye Y., Cai D., Yao J., Wei S., Yan H., Chen F. Review on Dynamic Modulus of Coarse-Grained Soil Filling for High-Speed Railway Subgrade. Transportation Geotechnics 2021, 27, DOI: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100421. [Google Scholar]
  13. Solberg J.M., Hossain Q., Blink J.A., Bohlen S.R., Mseis G., Greenberg H. Development of a Generalized Methodology for Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis Using Nonlinear Time-Domain TechniquesNEAMS Program, DOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE-41) https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc834891/ [Google Scholar]
  14. Wolf J.; Song C. Some Cornerstones of Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction. Engineering Structures 2002, 24, DOI: 10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00082-7. [Google Scholar]
  15. Park J., Santamarina J.C. Sand response to a large number of loading cycles under zero-lateral-strain conditions: evolution of void ratio and small-strain stiffness // Géotechnique, Vol. 69, No. 6, Jun 2019. pp. 501–513. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.