Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 458, 2023
International Scientific Conference Energy Management of Municipal Facilities and Environmental Technologies (EMMFT-2023)
Article Number 06006
Number of page(s) 7
Section Environmental Education, Humanization and Sustainability
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202345806006
Published online 07 December 2023
  1. T. W. Bean, A. Wilson-Lopez, K. Gregory, Shifting from disciplinary versus content area literacy to a transdisciplinary approach, International Encyclopedia of Education (Fourth Edition), 448-455 (2023) doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.07002-0. [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Nourani Rinaldi, Dealing with complex and uncertain futures: Glimpses from transdisciplinary water research, Futures, 147, 103113 (2023) doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2023.103113 [Google Scholar]
  3. M. J. Stablein, J. Gonzalez Cruz, E. N. Fidan, J. Talbot, S. P. Reed, R. S. Walters, A. J. Ogunyiola, M. Fernández Frey, M. Ramirez, B. Rosado Casanova, J. Heemstra, A. Marshall, L. F. Rodríguez, Compound[ing] disasters in Puerto Rico: Pathways for virtual transdisciplinary collaboration to enhance community resilience, Global Environmental Change, 76, 102558 (2022) http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102558. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Vogt, M. Abood, A transdisciplinary, mixed methods research agenda for evaluating the collective impact approach for tree planting: The CommuniTree initiative in northwest Indiana, U.S, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 53, 126735, (2020) http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126735. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Schäfer, M. Kröger, Joint problem framing in sustainable land use research: Experience with Constellation Analysis as a method for inter-and transdisciplinary knowledge integration, Land Use Policy, 57, 526-539 (2016) http://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. L. Karrasch, T. Grothmann, T. A. Michel, M. Wesselow, H. Wolter, A. Unger, A. Wegner, D. Giebels, B. Siebenhüner, Integrating knowledge within and between knowledge types in transdisciplinary sustainability research: Seven case studies and an indicator framework, Environmental Science & Policy, 131, 14-25 (2022) doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.01.014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Strumińska-Kutra, Ch. Scholl, Taking power seriously: Towards a power-sensitive approach for transdisciplinary action research, Futures, 135, 102881 (2022) doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102881. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. M. G. Lawrence, S. Williams, P. Nanz, O. Renn, Characteristics, potentials, and challenges of transdisciplinary research, One Earth, 5(1), 44-61 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.12.010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. K. L. Schofield, H. Thorpe, S. T. Sims, Compartmentalised disciplines: Why low energy availability research calls for transdisciplinary approaches, Performance Enhancement & Health, 8(2–3), 100172 (2020) http://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2020.100172 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Hahn, S. Kirschke, S. Caucci, A. Müller, L. Benavides, T. Avellán, Perceptions of transdisciplinary research – A comparative case study from Latin America, Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 100207 (2023) http://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100207. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. R. Pärli, How input, process, and institutional factors influence the effects of transdisciplinary research projects, Environmental Science & Policy, 140, 80-92 (2023) http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.11.019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Zscheischler, R. Brunsch, S. Rogga, R.W. Scholz, Perceived risks and vulnerabilities of employing digitalization and digital data in agriculture – Socially robust orientations from a transdisciplinary process, Journal of Cleaner Production, 358, 132034 (2022) http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132034. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Thomas, M. Richter, W. Lestari, S. Prabawaningtyas, Y. Anggoro, I. Kuntoadji, Transdisciplinary research methods in community energy development and governance in Indonesia: Insights for sustainability science, Energy Research & Social Science, 45, 184-194 (2018) http://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. A. I. Walter, S. Helgenberger, A. Wiek, R. W. Scholz, Measuring societal effects of transdisciplinary research projects: Design and application of an evaluation method, Evaluation and Program Planning, 30(4), 325-338 (2007) http://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.08.002. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Lorenz, Transdisciplinary sustainability research. Procedural perspectives and professional cooperation, Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 4, 100182 (2022) http://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. B. Smetschka, V. Gaube, Co-creating formalized models: Participatory modelling as method and process in transdisciplinary research and its impact potentials, Environmental Science & Policy, 103, 41-49 (2020) http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Y. Huang, W. Lu, J. Liu, Q. Cheng, Y. Bu, Towards transdisciplinary impact of scientific publications: A longitudinal, comprehensive, and large-scale analysis on Microsoft Academic Graph, Information Processing & Management, 59(2), 102859 (2022) http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102859. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.