EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 460 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 460 (2023) 05025 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 460, 2023
International Scientific Conference on Biotechnology and Food Technology (BFT-2023)
Article Number 05025
Number of page(s) 10
Section Eco Education and Food Waste Reduction
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346005025
Published online 11 December 2023
  1. A. H. Obehioye, O.H. Osahon, Creative accounting and firm’s market value in Nigeria. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 2 (3), 38–50 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  2. Asian Development Bank. Corporate Governance, Firm Profitability, and Share Valuation in the Philippines (2019) www.adb.org/publications/corporate-governance-profitability-share-valuation-philippines (Last accessed 14.06.2023) [Google Scholar]
  3. B.D. Akinla, Impact of capital structure on the financial performance of Nigerian firms. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 12 (1), 43–61 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  4. D. Holtz-Eakin, W. Newey, H. Rosen, Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica, 56, 1371–1395 (1988) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. D. Ushakov, E. Dudukalov, E. Kozlova, K. Shatila, The Internet of Things impact onsmart public transportation. Transportation Research Procedia, 63, 2392–2400 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Ushakov, M. Vinichenko, E. Frolova, Environmental Capital: A Reason forInterregional Differentiation or a Factor of Economy Stimulation (the Case of Russia). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 272 (3), 032111 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Ushakov, V. Bandurin, A. Bandurin, A. Taxation Regime as a factor of mutuallyintergrated macroeconomic systems’ dynamics. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 13 (1), 171–179 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. E.S. Echanis, Philippine corporate governance: Issues and reforms. Philippine Management Review, 13 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Paniagua, R. Rivelles, J. Sapena. Corporate governance and financial performance: The role of ownership and board structure, J. of Business Research, 89, 229–234 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J.H. Davis, F. D. Schoorman, L. Donaldson, Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 22 (1), 20–47 (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Zhang, An institutional approach to gender diversity and firm performance. Organization Science, 31 (2), 439–457 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Ausloos, F. Bartolacci, N. G. Castellano, R. Cerqueti, Exploring how innovation strategies at time of crisis influence performance: A cluster analysis perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30 (4), 484–497 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Kyere, M. Ausloos, Corporate governance and firms financial performance in the United Kingdom. International J. of Finance & Economics, 26 (2), 1871–1885 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Mahrani, N. Soewarno, The effect of good corporate governance mechanism and corporate social responsibility on financial performance with earnings management as mediating variable, Asian J. of Accounting Research, 3 (1), 41–60 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Saleh, R. Surafa, S. Shukeri, A. Nour & Z. Maigosh. The effect of board multiple directorships and CEO characteristics on firm performance: evidence from Palestine. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 10 (4), 637–654 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. M.B. Wintoki, J. S. Linck, J.M. Netter, Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance, J. of Fin. Econ., 105 (3), 581–606 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  17. M. J. Sullivan, A. Unite, Corporate Governance, Philippine Style. Securities and Exchange Commission. Probe on the Phenomenal Rise and Fall of the Price of BWRC Shares (2000) [Google Scholar]
  18. O. Arslan, M. B. Karan, C. Eksi. Board structure and corporate performance. Managing global transitions, 8 (1), 3 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  19. O. Ibhagui, F. Olokoyo, Leverage and firm performance: New evidence on the role of firm size, The North American J. of Econ. and Fin., 45, 57–82 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Goel, Implications of corporate governance on financial performance: an analytical review of governance and social reporting reforms in India. Asian J. of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 3, 4 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Q. Meng, Research On The Relationship Between The Heterogeneity Of The Top Management Team (TMT) And The Total Factor Productivity (TFP) of enterprises. The EUrASEANs: J. on Global Socio-Economic Dynamics, 4 (35), 31–42 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. R. Blundell, S. Bond, Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. of Econ., 87, 115–143 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. R. O’Kelley, et al., Global and Regional Trends in Corporate Governance. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance (2021) [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Pillai, H.A. Al-Malkawi, On the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from GCC countries. Research in International Business and Finance, 44, 394–410 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. R. Zaman, N. Atawnah, G. Baghdadi, J. Liu, Fiduciary duty or loyalty? Evidence from co-opted boards and corporate misconduct. Journal of Corporate Finance, 70, 102066 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. R. K. Ronoowah, B. Seetanah, Corporate governance, capital structure, and firm performance: a panel VAR approach. SN Business & Economics, 3 (1), 1–30 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  27. S. Hundal, Multiple directorships of corporate boards and firm performance in India. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14 (4), 150–164 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. S. Johnson, T. Mitton, Cronyism and capital controls: evidence from Malaysia. Journal of financial economics, 67 (2), 351–382 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. S. Ullah, P. Akhtarb, G. Zaefarian, Dealing with endogeneity bias: The generalized method of moments (GMM) for panel data. Industrial Marketing Management, 71, 69–78 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Securities and Exchange Commission. SEC Memorandum Circular No. 19 Series of 2016: Code of Corporate Governance for Publicly-listed Companies (2016) www.sec.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/2016_memo_circular_no.19.pdf (Last accessed 17.06.2023) [Google Scholar]
  31. T.F. Guluma, The impact of corporate governance measures on firm performance: the influences of managerial overconfidence. Future Business J., 7 (1), 1–18 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. U. Iqbal, M. Usman, Impact of Financial Leverage on Firm Performance: Textile Composite Companies of Pakistan. SEISENSE Journal of Management, 1 (2), 70–78 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. X. Zeng, The Influence Of Management Power On Enterprise Performance. The EUrASEANs: Journal on Global Socio-Economic Dynamics, 5 (30), 95–103 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.