EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 460 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 460 (2023) 05038 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 460, 2023
International Scientific Conference on Biotechnology and Food Technology (BFT-2023)
Article Number 05038
Number of page(s) 7
Section Eco Education and Food Waste Reduction
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346005038
Published online 11 December 2023
  1. F.M. Tulpanov, On the subject of environmental law. The problems of the theory of environmental law. Bulletin of Ural Institute of Economics, Management and Law, 3, 62–66 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  2. The Convention on Biological Diversity. http://www.un-documents.net/cbd.htm (Last accessed 14.09.2023) [Google Scholar]
  3. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf. (Last accessed 14.09.2023) [Google Scholar]
  4. P.M. Tiersma, Legal Language (University of Chicago Press, 1999). [Google Scholar]
  5. O.M. Litvishko, To the issue of linguocognitive modeling of legal concept sphere, Professional Communication: Top Issues of Linguistics and Methods of Teaching 14, 87–96 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  6. M.L. Avakova, M.E. Mosesova. Communicative features of the English-language judicial discourse. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics, 1, 61–71 (2022). https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2022-1-61-71 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. I.V. Palashevskaya, Genre organization of legal discourse. Bulletin of Udmurt University. History and Philology, 2, 146–151 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  8. O.M. Litvishko, E.V. Miletova, Socio-cognitive modeling of the discourse of civil law: lexical-semantic aspect. Cognitive Language Studies, 37, 770–775 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  9. A.V. Garamyan, N.S. Rudenko, “Remedy” as a utilitary and linguistic phenomenon in the English legal discourse, Professional Communication: Top Issues of Linguistics and Methods of Teaching, 16, 93–98 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  10. O. Litvishko, E. Miletova, Structural peculiarities of terminological system of international law (based on ILO conventions). The European Proceedings of Social &Behavioural Sciences EpSBS, 58, 2324–2335 (The Future Academy, 2019). https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.03.02.268 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. I.V. Palashevskaya, Axiological foundations for legal discourse. Nauchny Dialog, 11, 144–156 (2017). https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2017-11-144-156 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. M.E. Mosesova, T.A. Shiryaeva, Verbalization of performative units in English texts of international conventions: morphological aspect. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics, 5 (19), 110–121 (2020). https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2020.5.10 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ch. Hilson, The role of narrative in environmental law: the nature of tales and tales of nature. Journal of Environmental Law, 34 (1), 1–24 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqab043 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. D.P. Ionescu, M. Eliantonio, Words are stones: constructing bindingness through language in EU environmental soft law. In P. Lancós, N. Xanthoulis, and L. A. Jiménez, The Legal Effects of EU Soft Law: Theory, Language and Sectoral Insights into EU Multi-Level Governance (Forthcoming). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstractid=4053532 (Last accessed 24.09.2023) [Google Scholar]
  15. Environmental law terms: getting through legal language labyrinth. https://www.icpdr.org/publications/environmental-law-terms-getting-through-legal-language-labyrinth (Last accessed 24.09.2023) [Google Scholar]
  16. Importance of translation in environmental law. https://www.languageservicesbureau.com/blog/importance-of-translation-in-environmental-law.php. (Last accessed 24.09.2023) [Google Scholar]
  17. I.M. Mgbeoji, Environmental law: a guide to concepts. Dal J Leg Stud, 9, 344–347 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  18. O.M. Litvishko, The research of legal discourse based on discourse complexology. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics, 3, 76–90 (2023) https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2023-3-76-90. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. H. McLaughlin, SMOG grading - a new readability formula. Journal of Reading, 22, 639–646 (1969) [Google Scholar]
  20. J.P. Kincaid, R.P.J. Fishburne, R.L. Rogers, B.S. Chissom, Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated readability index, fog count and Flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Research Branch Report, 8–75 (Naval Technical Training Command, Millington, TN, 1975) [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Coleman, T.L. Liau, A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 283–284 (1975). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. D.H. Maulud, A.M. Abdulazeez, A review on linear regression comprehensive in machine learning. Journal of Applied Science and Technology Trends 1, 140–147 (2020). https://doi.org/10.38094/jastt1457. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. O. Blinova, N. Tarasov, A hybrid model of complexity estimation: evidence from Russian legal texts. Front. Artif. Intell., 5, 1008530 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.1008530. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. O.M. Litvishko, M.R. Manukyan, V.A. Doctorevitch, E.V. Miletova, R.M. Grankina, Functional and stylistic features of pronomial adverbs in the English-language legal discourse. Modern Global Economic System: Evolutional Development vs. Revolutionary Leap: Institute of Scientific Communications Conference 198, 378–385 (Cham: Springer Nature, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69415-943 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. R. Haigh, Legal English (Routledge, 2015) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.