Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 476, 2024
The 4th Aceh International Symposium on Civil Engineering (AISCE 2023)
Article Number 01067
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202447601067
Published online 17 January 2024
  1. Al-Abadi A.M., Shamsuddin S., Ali K., Al-Ali A. 2016 GIS-Based Integration of Catastrophe Theory and Analytical Hierarchy Process for Mapping Flood Susceptibility: A Case Study of Teeb Area, Southern Iraq. Environ. Earth Sci. 75: 687. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Balica S. and Wright N. G. 2009 A network of knowledge on applying an indicator-based methodology for minimizing flood vulnerability,” Hydrol. Process., vol. 23, No. 20, pp. 2983–2986. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. BNPB 2015 Kajian Risiko Bencana (KRB) Provinsi Aceh Tahun 2016-2020, Deputi Bidang Pencegahan Dan Kesiapsiagaan Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana, https://bpba.acehprov.go.id/media/2022.09/dokumenkajianrisikobencanaaceh2016-20201.pdf [Google Scholar]
  4. Chakraborty S. and Mukhopadhyay S. 2019 Assessing flood risk using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and geographical information system (GIS): application in Coochbehar district of West Bengal, India. Nat Hazards (Dordr) 99, 247–274. [Google Scholar]
  5. Darmawan A., Suprayogi K. 2017 Analisis Tingkat Kerawanan Banjir di Kabupaten Sampang Menggunakan Metode Overlay dengan Scoring Berbasis Sistem Informasi Geografis, J. Geod. Undip, vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 31–40. [Google Scholar]
  6. de Andrade M. M. N. and Szlafsztein C. F. 2015 Community participation in flood mapping in the Amazon through interdisciplinary methods,” Nat. Hazards, vol. 78, No. 3, pp. 1491–1500. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fatma E., Omar H.O. Hassan Omar, Imad, A., Maamar, B. 2020 Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and Their Applications- A Literature Review, Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Dubai, UAE, pp. 2654–2663. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kaya C.M., Derin L. 2023 Parameters and methods used in flood susceptibility mapping: a review. Journal of Water and Climate Change 14/6, 1935. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kazakis N. N., Kougias I., Patsialis T. 2015 Assessment of flood hazard areas at a regional scale using an index-based approach and Analytical Hierarchy Process: Application in Rhodope-Evros region, Greece. Sci. Total Environ. 538, 555–563. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mishra K. and Sinha R. 2020 Flood risk assessment in the Kosi megafan using multi-criteria decision analysis:A hydro-geomorphic approach. Geomorphology, 350, 106861. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mooren F., Spracklen D.V., Kirkby M.J., Schofield L. 2022 The impact of semi-natural broadleaf woodland and pasture on soil properties and flood discharge. Hydrological Processes. Jan; 36(1). [Google Scholar]
  12. Saaty T. L. 1990 How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process,” Eur. J. Oper. Res. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sumit D. 2019 Geospatial mapping of flood susceptibility and hydro-geomorphic response to the floods in Ulhas basin, India.” Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment 14, 60–74. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Winsemius H.C., Aerts J.C.J.H., van Beek L.P.H., Bierkens M.F.P., Bouwman A., Jongman B., Kwadijk J.C.J., Ligtvoet, W., Lucas P.L., van Vuuren D.P. 2015 Global drivers of future river flood risk. Nat. Clim.Chang, 6, 381–385. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.