Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 480, 2024
II International Scientific and Practical Conference “Energy, Ecology and Technology in Agriculture” (EEA2023)
Article Number 03024
Number of page(s) 8
Section Agriculture, Engineering and Technology in the Agro-Industrial Complex
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448003024
Published online 18 January 2024
  1. H. Barrett, D.C. Rose, Perceptions of the fourth agricultural revolution: what’s in, what’s out, and what consequences are anticipated, Sociol. Rural., 62, 162–189 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  2. D. Brier, C.R. Eastwood, B.T. Dela Rue, D.W. Viehland, Foresighting for responsible innovation using a Delphi approach: a case study of virtual fencing innovation in cattle farming, J. Agric. Environ. Ethics, 33, 3-6, 549–569 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. D.J. Hess, D. Lee, B. Biebl, M. Fränzle, S. Lehnhoff, H. Neema, A comparative, sociotechnical design perspective on responsible innovation: Multidisciplinary research and education on digitized energy and automated vehicles, J. Responsible Innovation, 8, 421–444 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. D.R. Sharipov, O.A. Yakimov, M.K. Gainullina, A.R. Kashaeva, I.N. Kamaldinov, Development of automatic milking systems and their classification, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 659, 012080 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Birner, T. Daum, C. Pray, Who drives the digital revolution in agriculture? A review of supply-side trends, players and challenges, Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 43, 4, 1260–1285 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13145 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Fore, K. Frank, T. Norton, E. Svendsen, J.A. Alfredsen, T. Dempster, H. Eguiraun, et al. Precision fish farming: A new framework to improve production in aquaculture, Biosystems Engineering, 173, 176–193 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. R. Visser, O.F. Obi, Automation and robotics in timber harvesting operations: identifying near-term opportunities, Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 42, 1, 1324 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  8. A.P. Gospodarikov, Y.N. Vykhodtsev, M.A. Zatsepin, A method for calculating effect of a blast-induced seismic wave on nonuniform enclosing rock mass around a tunnel, J Min Sci, 56, 903–913 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062739120060034 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M.D. Ilyinov, D.N. Petrov, D.A. Karmanskiy, A.A. Selikhov, Physical simulation aspects of structural changes in rock samples under thermobaric conditions at great depths, Mining Science and Technology, 8, 4, 290–302 (2023) https://doi.org/10.17073/2500-0632-2023-09-150 [Google Scholar]
  10. E. Bykowa, M. Skachkova, I. Raguzin, I. Dyachkova, M. Boltov, Automation of Negative Infrastructural Externalities Assessment Methods to Determine the Cost of Land Resources Based on the Development of a “Thin Clienť’Model. Sustainability, 14, 9383 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159383 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. I.I. Raguzin, E.N. Bykowa, O.U. Lepikhina, Polygonal metric grid method for estimating the cadastral value of land plots, Lomonosov geography journal, 78, 3, 92103 (2023) DOI: 10.55959/MSU0579-9414.5.78.3.8 [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Hazieva, N. Rafikova, G. Habirov, Z. Zalilova, E. Sagadeeva, Econometric models of cattle-breeding production cost, Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, 19, 4, 857–865 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.