EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 571 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 571 (2024) 02004 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 571, 2024
1st International Conference on Management and Sustainable Environment (ICOMSE 2024)
Article Number 02004
Number of page(s) 21
Section Marketing Management in Sustainable Environment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202457102004
Published online 20 September 2024
  1. “Annual Report BOI 2023.” Accessed: Aug. 04, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.boi.go.th/upload/report/2566/index.html#p=1 [Google Scholar]
  2. B. Lev, Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  3. D. Venanzi, Financial performance measures and value creation: the state of the art. Milan, Italia: Springer, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. C. D. Ittner and D. F. Larcker, “Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol. 32, no. 1–3, pp. 349–410, Dec. 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00026-X. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. D. Ghosh and A. Wu, “The effect of positive and negative financial and nonfinancial performance measures on analysts’ recommendations,” Behavioral Research in Accounting, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 47–64, 2012, doi: 10.2308/BRIA-10283. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. M. J. Epstein and K. G. Palepu, “What Financial Analysts Want - Article - Faculty & Research - Harvard Business School,” Strategic Finance 80, vol. 10, pp. 48–52, 1999, Accessed: Aug. 04, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=17422 [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Vanstraelen, M. T. Zarzeski, and S. W. G. Robb, “Corporate Nonfinancial Disclosure Practices and Financial Analyst Forecast Ability Across Three European Countries,” Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 249–278, Oct. 2003, doi: 10.1111/1467-646X.00098. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Orens and N. Lybaert, “Does the financial analysts’ usage of non- financial information influence the analysts’ forecast accuracy? Some evidence from the Belgian sell-side financial analyst,” International Journal of Accounting, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 237–271, 2007, doi: 10.1016/J.INTACC.2007.06.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. D. S. Dhaliwal, O. Z. Li, A. Tsang, and Y. G. Yang, “Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital: The Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting,” The Accounting Review, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 59–100, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.2308/ACCR.00000005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Q. Wu, Y. Pan, P. Zhou, and C. Li, “The Relationship Between Nonfinancial Measurements and Company Performance - Based on the Level of Customer Satisfaction,” Sep. 2020, doi: 10.2991/ASSEHR.K.200826.015. [Google Scholar]
  11. R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton, “The Balanced Scorecard—Measures that Drive Performance,” Harvard Business Review, 1992. Accessed: Aug. 04, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://hbr.org/1992/01/the- balanced-scorecard-measures-that-drive-performance-2 [Google Scholar]
  12. R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton, “strategic learning & the balanced scorecard,” Strategy & Leadership, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 18–24, Mar. 1996, doi: 10.1108/eb054566. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. T. M. Amabile and M. Khaire, “Creativity and the Role of the Leader,” Harvard Business Review, pp. 1–19, 2008. Accessed: Aug. 04, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://hbr.org/2008/10/creativity-and- the-role-of-the-leader [Google Scholar]
  14. P. A. Zawislak, A. C. Alves, J. Tello-Gamarra, D. Barbieux, and F. M. Reichert, “Influences of the Internal Capabilities of Firms on their Innovation Performance: A Case Study Investigation in Brazil,” 2013. [Google Scholar]
  15. D. G. Sirmon, M. A. Hitt, and R. D. Ireland, “Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 273–292, 2007, doi: 10.5465/AMR.2007.23466005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Q. Yu et al., “Pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse with liquid hot water and aqueous ammonia,” Bioresour Technol, vol. 144, pp. 210–215, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2013.06.078. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. E. L. Psomas and C. Jaca, “The impact of total quality management on service company performance: evidence from Spain,” International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 380–398, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-07-2014-0090. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. H. Y. Park, H. Chang, and Y. S. Park, “Firm’s knowledge creation structure for new product development,” Cogent Business & Management, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1023507–1023507, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2015.1023507. [Google Scholar]
  19. R. Garcia and R. Calantone, “A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 110–132, 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0737-6782(01)00132-1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. J. M. Martins, M. F. Shahzad, and S. Xu, “Factors influencing entrepreneurial intention to initiate new ventures: evidence from university students,” Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship 2023 12:1, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–27, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1186/S13731- 023-00333-9. [Google Scholar]
  21. P. W. Roberts, “Product innovation, product-market competition and persistent profitability in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 655–670, Jul. 1999, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199907)20:7<655::AID-SMJ44>3.0.CO;2- P. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. M. J. Nieto, L. Santamaria, and Z. Fernandez, “Understanding the Innovation Behavior of Family Firms,” Journal of Small Business Management, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 382–399, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1111/JSBM.12075. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. L. E. Westphal Linsu Kim, J. Dahlman The World Bank Washington, and U. April, “Reflections on Korea’s ACQ,uisition of Technological Capability.” [Google Scholar]
  24. H. Tutar, S. Nart, and D. Bingöl, “The Effects of Strategic Orientations on Innovation Capabilities and Market Performance: The Case of ASEM,” Procedia Soc Behav Sci, vol. 207, pp. 709–719, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015.10.144. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. H. G. Rainey, Understanding & Managing Public Organizations, 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass., 2009. [Google Scholar]
  26. B. E. Wright and S. K. Pandey, “Public Organizations and Mission Valence: When Does Mission Matter?,” Adm Soc, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 22–44, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.1177/0095399710386303. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. D. Karaferis, V. Aletras, and D. Niakas, “Determining dimensions of job satisfaction in healthcare using factor analysis,” BMC Psychol, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 240, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00941-2. [Google Scholar]
  28. S. Szücs, S. Drobnič, L. den Dulk, and R. Verwiebe, “Quality of Life and Satisfaction with the Work-life Balance,” Quality of Life and Work in Europe, pp. 95–117, 2011, doi: 10.1057/9780230299443_6. [Google Scholar]
  29. P. S. Ring and J. L. Perry, “Strategic Management in Public and Private Organizations: Implications of Distinctive Contexts and Constraints,” The Academy of Management Review, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 276, Apr. 1985, doi: 10.2307/257969. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. R. S. Kaplan, “Conceptual Foundations of the Balanced Scorecard,” Handbooks of Management Accounting Research, vol. 3, pp. 1253–1269, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1016/S1751-3243(07)03003-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. A. Luca, L. M. Lupu, and I. V. Herghiligiu, “ORGANIZATIONAL KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION - STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE OF ORGANIZATION,” CBU International Conference Proceedings, vol. 4, pp. 126–131, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.12955/CBUP.V4.753. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. I. Nonaka, R. Toyama, and N. Konno, “SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation,” Long Range Plann, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 5–34, Feb. 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0024-6301(99)00115-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. V. J. Marsick, “Toward a unifying framework to support informal learning theory, research and practice,” Journal of Workplace Learning, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 265–275, May 2009, doi: 10.1108/13665620910954184. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. M. Murray, “Narrative psychology and narrative analysis.,” Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design., pp. 95–112, Dec. 2004, doi: 10.1037/10595-006. [Google Scholar]
  35. T. Hernaus, M. Škerlavaj, and V. Dimovski, “Relationship between Organisational Learning and Organisational Performance: The Case of Croatia,” Transformations in Business & Economics, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  36. F. Lwanga, M. Korir, and R. Bonuke, “Organizational Learning Process, CEO Values and Sustainability Performance of Manufacturing Firms in Uganda,” SEISENSE Journal of Management, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 39–57, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.33215/SJOM.V6I1.853. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. N. S. Vihari, M. K. Rao, and U. Jada, “Empirical linkage between sustainable HRM and organisational flexibility: A SEM-based approach,” International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 65–86, 2018, doi: 10.1504/IJBIR.2018.094198. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. V. J. Marsick and K. E. Watkins, “Demonstrating the Value of an Organization’s Learning Culture: The Dimensions of the Learning Organization Questionnaire,” http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1523422303005002002, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 132–151, May 2003, doi: 10.1177/1523422303005002002. [Google Scholar]
  39. P. K. Smith, Cyberbullying and cyber aggression In S. R. Jimerson, A. B. Nickerson, M. J. Mayer, & M. J. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of school violence and school safety: International research and practice, 2nd ed. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group., 2012. [Google Scholar]
  40. B. van Mierlo and P. J. Beers, “Understanding and governing learning in sustainability transitions: A review,” Environ Innov Soc Transit, vol. 34, pp. 255–269, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.EIST.2018.08.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. G. P. Huber, “Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures on JSTOR,” Organization Science, vol. 2, pp. 88–115, Mar. 1991, Accessed: Aug. 04, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2634941 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. E. Danneels and A. Vestal, “Normalizing vs. analyzing: Drawing the lessons from failure to enhance firm innovativeness,” J Bus Ventur, vol. 35, no. 1, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.JBUSVENT.2018.10.001. [Google Scholar]
  43. C. L. Wang and P. K. Ahmed, “The development and validation of the organisational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis,” European Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 303–313, Dec. 2004, doi: 10.1108/14601060410565056/FULL/PDF. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. D. Teece, M. A. Peteraf, and S. Heaton, “Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Agility: Risk, Uncertainty and Entrepreneurial Management in the Innovation Economy,” SSRN Electronic Journal, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.2139/SSRN.2771245. [Google Scholar]
  45. N. S. Vihari and M. K. Rao, “Business model innovation and organisational mindfulness as determinants of corporate sustainability: An empirical study,” International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 238–254, 2017, doi: 10.1504/IJBIR.2017.083541. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. R. Rauter, D. Globocnik, E. Perl-Vorbach, and R. J. Baumgartner, “Open innovation and its effects on economic and sustainability innovation performance,” Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 226–233, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.JIK.2018.03.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. F. Vanclay, “Social principles for agricultural extension to assist in the promotion of natural resource management,” Aust J Exp Agric, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 213–222, 2004, doi: 10.1071/EA02139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. N. Persaud and P. McLeod, “Demonstrations of subconscious processing with the binary exclusion task,” Behav Brain Sci, vol. 37, no. 1, p. 37, 2014, doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13000812. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. E. R. G. Pedersen, W. Gwozdz, and K. K. Hvass, “Exploring the Relationship Between Business Model Innovation, Corporate Sustainability, and Organisational Values within the Fashion Industry,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 149, no. 2, pp. 267–284, May 2018, doi: 10.1007/S10551-016-3044-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. TIFFA, “Thai International Freight Forwarders Association,” Bangkok, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  51. S. I. S. Al-Hawary and B. A. H. A. Al-Nady, “The effect of benchmarking procurement plan and after sales services on suppliers sales success in western region of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia,” International Journal of Services and Operations Management, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 103–135, 2014, doi: 10.1504/IJSOM.2014.064036. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. D. A. Aaker, V. Kumar, and G. S. Day, Marketing Research, 7th ed. Wiley, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  53. J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, and B. J. Babin, Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective Global Edition, 7th ed. Pearson Education, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  54. W. L. Newman, Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 7th ed. Pearson Education Limited. [Google Scholar]
  55. J. S. Armstrong and T. S. Overton, “Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 396, Aug. 1977, doi: 10.2307/3150783. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. R. B. Burns and R. A. Burns, Business Research Methods and Statistics Using SPSS. SAGE Publications, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  57. P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. MacKenzie, J. Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff, “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 879–903, Oct. 2003, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. G. S. Kearns and R. Sabherwal, “Strategic Alignment Between Business and Information Technology: A Knowledge-Based View of Behaviors, Outcome, and Consequences,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 129–162, Dec. 2006, doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222230306. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. R. C. Turner and L. Carlson, “Indexes of Item-Objective Congruence for Multidimensional Items,” Int J Test, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 163–171, Jun. 2003, doi: 10.1207/S15327574IJT0302_5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. J. C. Nunnally, Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw- Hill, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  61. R. M. O’Brien, “A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors,” Qual Quant, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 673–690, Oct. 2007, doi: 10.1007/S11135-006-9018-6/METRICS. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. T. Bailetti, “Technology Innovation Management Review Technology Entrepreneurship: Overview, Definition, and Distinctive Aspects,” 2012, Accessed: Aug. 04, 2024. [Online]. Available: www.timreview.ca [Google Scholar]
  63. B. Aulet and F. Murray, “A TALE OF TWO ENTREPRENEURS: Understanding Differences in the Types of Entrepreneurship in the Economy,” 2013. [Google Scholar]
  64. J. Ciburiene, “THE INNOVATIVENESS OF SME ACTIVITY IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBALIZATION IN LITHUANIA | Economics and Management,” ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT, 2009, Accessed: Aug. 04, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ecoman.ktu.lt/index.php/Ekv/article/view/9463 [Google Scholar]
  65. A. Frost and M. Sc, “A Synthesis of Knowledge Management Failure Factors,” 2014, Accessed: Aug. 04, 2024. [Online]. Available: www.knowledge-management-tools.net [Google Scholar]
  66. J. Gibb and J. M. Haar, “Risk taking, innovativeness and competitive rivalry: A three-way interaction towards firm performance,” International Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 871–891, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1142/S136391961000291X. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  67. C.-H. Wang, C.-T. Ting, and C.-W. Huang, “An Efficiency Comparison of High Tech Firm R&D Innovation in Different Environmental Conditions,” Asia Pacific Management Review, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 133–164, 2011, Accessed: Aug. 04, 2024. [Online]. Available: www.apmr.management.ncku.edu.tw [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.