EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 571 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 571 (2024) 02008 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 571, 2024
1st International Conference on Management and Sustainable Environment (ICOMSE 2024)
Article Number 02008
Number of page(s) 9
Section Marketing Management in Sustainable Environment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202457102008
Published online 20 September 2024
  1. M. S. M. Daud, H. Wahid, and M. A. M. Noor, “The influences of attitude, religiosity, and subjective norm on Muslim’s donation intention during COVID-19 lockdown in Malaysia,” Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 915–923, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Y. Chen, R. Dai, J. Yao, and Y. Li, “Donate time or money? The determinants of donation intention in online crowdfunding,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 16, p. 4269, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. I. Ajzen, “The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions,” Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 314–324, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Sok, J. A. R. Borges, P. Schmidt, and I. Ajzen, “Farmer Behaviour as Reasoned Action: A Critical Review of Research With the Theory of Planned Behaviour,” J. Agric. Econ., vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 388–412, 2020, doi: 10.1111/1477-9552.12408. [Google Scholar]
  5. V. C. Sheer, “The State of Norm-Based Antismoking Research: Conceptual Frameworks, Research Designs, and Implications for Interventions,” Health Commun., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 310–325, 2021, doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1950296. [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Mai and H. T. Le thi, “The Intention of Participation in Voluntary Health Insurance Under the View of Planned Behavior Theory: Evidence of Hanoi Vietnam,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. Anal., vol. 06, no. 06, 2023, doi: 10.47191/ijmra/v6-i6-32. [Google Scholar]
  7. F. Idrees, H. Hassan, T. Syed, S. N. Ahmad, and M. M. Khan, “Perceived Behavioral Control Mediates the Relationship Between Personal Characteristics and Psycho-Sociological Factors, and Entrepreneurial Inten-Tions,” Res. J. Soc. Issues, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 217–232, 2022, doi: 10.56976/rjsi.v4i1.50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. K. Moser, “Thinking green, buying green? Drivers of pro - Environmental purchasing behavior,” J. Consum. Mark., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 167–175, 2015, doi: 10.1108/JCM-10-2014-1179. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. M. M. Muslichah, R. Abdullah, and L. A. Razak, “The Effect of halal Foods Awareness on Purchase Decision With Religiosity as a Moderating Variable,” J. Islam. Mark., 2019, doi: 10.1108/jima-09-2017-0102. [Google Scholar]
  10. E. A. Minton, N. Spielmann, L. R. Kahle, and C.-H. Kim, “The subjective norms of sustainable consumption: A cross-cultural exploration,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 82, pp. 400–408, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.12.031. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. I. Ajzen, “The theory of planned behavior,” Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179–211, 1991. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Kopelowicz, R. Zárate, C. J. Wallace, R. P. Liberman, S. R. López, and J. Mintz, “Using the Theory of Planned Behavior to Improve Treatment Adherence in Mexican Americans With Schizophrenia.,” J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 2015, doi: 10.1037/a0039346. [Google Scholar]
  13. L. Yang et al., “Vaccination Intention and Behavior of the General Public in China: Cross-Sectional Survey and Moderated Mediation Model Analysis,” Jmir Public Heal. Surveill., 2022, doi: 10.2196/34666. [Google Scholar]
  14. J. M. Kowalsky, S. T. McGlone, L. K. Himawan, D. Kessler, and B. H. Shaz, “Development of Common Metrics for Donation Attitude, Subjective Norm, Perceived Behavioral Control, and Intention for the Blood Donation Context,” Transfusion, 2013, doi: 10.1111/trf.12471. [Google Scholar]
  15. H. S. Park and S. W. Smith, “Distinctiveness and Influence of Subjective Norms, Personal Descriptive and Injunctive Norms, and Societal Descriptive and Injunctive Norms on Behavioral Intent: A Case of Two Behaviors Critical to Organ Donation,” Hum. Commun. Res., 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00296.x. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ostrom, “Ostrom, T. M., & Upshaw, H. S. (1968). Psychological perspective and attitude change. In Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 217-242).” 1968. [Google Scholar]
  17. S. O’Reilly and A. Kumar, “Closing the loop: An exploratory study of reverse ready-made garment supply chains in Delhi NCR,” Int. J. Logist. Manag., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 486–510, 2016, doi: 10.1108/IJLM-03-2015-0050. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. I. Botetzagias, A. Dima, and C. Malesios, “Extending the theory of planned behavior in the context of recycling: the role of moral norms and of demographic predictors,” Resour Conserv Recycl, vol. 95, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.12.004. [Google Scholar]
  19. Z. Wang, D. Guo, and X. Wang, “Determinants of residents’ e-waste recycling behaviour intentions: evidence from China,” J Clean Prod, vol. 137, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.155. [Google Scholar]
  20. I. Ajzen and M. Fishbein, “The Influence of Attitudes on Behavior,” 2014, doi: 10.4324/9781410612823-13. [Google Scholar]
  21. S. R. Knowles, M. K. Hyde, and K. M. White, “Predictors of Young People’s Charitable Intentions to Donate Money: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Perspective,” J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00932.x. [Google Scholar]
  22. Y. Chetioui, H. Satt, H. Lebdaoui, M. Baijou, S. Dassouli, and S. Katona, “Antecedents of Giving Charitable Donations (Sadaqah) During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Does Islamic Religiosity Matter?,” J. Islam. Mark., 2022, doi: 10.1108/jima-09-2021-0296. [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Mittelman and J. Rojas-Méndez, “Why Canadians give to charity: An extended theory of planned behaviour model,” Int. Rev. Public Nonprofit Mark., vol. 15, pp. 189–204, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. C. G. Kochan, S. Pourreza, H. Tran, and V. R. Prybutok, “Determinants and logistics of e-waste recycling,” Int J LogisManagement, vol. 27, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  25. C. Wan, G. Q. Shen, and A. Yu, “The role of perceived effectiveness of policy measures in predicting recycling behaviour in Hong Kong,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 83, pp. 141–151, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Dixit and A. J. Badgaiyan, “Towards improved understanding of reverse logistics- Examining mediating role of return intention,” Resour Conserv Recycl, vol. 107, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.11.021. [Google Scholar]
  27. H. I. Duh and O. Iyiola, “Explaining clothing decision-making styles among South- African and Nigerian young adults using two life-course theories,” J. Fash. Mark. Manag., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 303–321, 2020, doi: 10.1108/JFMM-08-2019-0171. [Google Scholar]
  28. U. Sekaran and R. Bougie, Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley & Sons, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  29. N. R. Ahamad and M. Ariffin, “Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice towards sustainable consumption among university students in Selangor, Malaysia,” Sustain. Prod. Consum., vol. 16, no. xxxx, pp. 88–98, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2018.06.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. F. Khan, W. Ahmed, and A. Najmi, “Understanding consumers’ behavior intentions towards dealing with the plastic waste: perspective of a developing country,” Resour Conserv Recycl, vol. 142, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.11.020. [Google Scholar]
  31. I. Ghozali, “Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) metode alternative dengan Partial Least Square,” Penerbit Univ. Diponegoro, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  32. J. F. Hair, G. Hult, C. Ringle, and M. Sardedt, “Hair JF Jr, Hult GTM, Ringle C, Sarstedt M (2017) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.” 2017. [Google Scholar]
  33. R. A. Kasri and U. H. Ramli, “Why do Indonesian Muslims donate through mosques?,” Int. J. Islam. Middle East. Financ. Manag., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 663–679, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1108/IMEFM-11-2018-0399. [Google Scholar]
  34. M. Kashif, S. Sarifuddin, and A. Hassan, “Charity donation: intentions and behaviour,” Mark. Intell. Plan., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 90–102, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1108/MIP-07-2013-0110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. B. Qin and G. Song, “Internal Motivations, External Contexts, and Sustainable Consumption Behavior in China—Based on the TPB-ABC Integration Model,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 13, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14137677. [Google Scholar]
  36. M. van Birgelen, J. Semeijn, and M. Keicher, “Packaging and proenvironmental consumption Behavior: Investigating purchase and disposal decisions for beverages,” Environ. Behav., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 125–146, 2009, doi: 10.1177/0013916507311140. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. M. Heikal, “The intention to pay zakat commercial: an application of revised theory of planned behavior,” J. Econ. Behav. Stud., vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 727–734, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.