EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 571 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 571 (2024) 03006 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 571, 2024
1st International Conference on Management and Sustainable Environment (ICOMSE 2024)
Article Number 03006
Number of page(s) 10
Section Financial Management in Sustainable Environment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202457103006
Published online 20 September 2024
  1. Mohammed MODAR. The Performance Measures of Islamic Banking Based on the Maqasid Framework. IIUM Int Account Conf (INTAC IV) 2008:53–7. [Google Scholar]
  2. Syafii M, Sanrego YD, Taufiq M. An Analysis of Islamic Banking Performance: Maqashid Index Implementation in Indonesia and Jordania. J Islam Financ 2012;1:12–29. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mergaliyev A, Asutay M, Avdukic A, Karbhari Y. Higher Ethical Objective (Maqasid al-Shari’ah) Augmented Framework for Islamic Banks: Assessing Ethical Performance and Exploring Its Determinants. vol. 170. Springer Netherlands; 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04331-4. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang X, Wang Z, Zhong X, Yang S, Siddik AB. Do Green Banking Activities Improve the Banks ’ Environmental Performance ? The Mediating Effect of Green Financing 2022:1–18. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen J, Siddik AB, Zheng GW, Masukujjaman M, Bekhzod S. The Effect of Green Banking Practices on Banks’ Environmental Performance and Green Financing: An Empirical Study. Energies 2022;15:1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15041292. [Google Scholar]
  6. Khan M, Bae J, Choi S, Han N. Good Faith Principles in Islamic Contract Law : A Comparative Study with Western Contract Law * 2019;15:143–59. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hussain A. Determinants of Islamic social reporting in Islamic banks of Pakistan 2021:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-02-2020-0060. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mohammed, Mustafa Omar. Razak, Dzuljastri Abdul. Taib FM. The Performance Measures of Islamic Banking Based on the Maqasid Framework. IIUM Int Account Conf (INTAC IV) 2008;1967:53–7. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mukhlisin M. Level of Maqāsid ul-Shari’āh’s in financial reporting standards for Islamic financial institutions. J Islam Account Bus Res 2021;12:60–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-03-2020-0090. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hudaefi FA, Noordin K. Harmonizing and constructing an integrated maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah index for measuring the performance of Islamic banks. ISRA Int J Islam Financ 2019;11:282–302. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-01- 2018-0003. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chapra MU, Bank ID. The Islamic Vision of Development in the Light of the Maq ā sid Al-Shar ī ‘ ah 2008. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4188.5047. [Google Scholar]
  12. Rehman A, Ullah I, Afridi F e. A, Ullah Z, Zeeshan M, Hussain A, et al. Adoption of green banking practices and environmental performance in Pakistan: a demonstration of structural equation modelling. Environ Dev Sustain 2021;23:13200–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01206-x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Julia T, Kassim S, Julia T. Exploring green banking performance of Islamic banks vs conventional banks in Bangladesh based on Maqasid Shariah framework 2019. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-10-2017-0105. [Google Scholar]
  14. Islam MS, Das PC. “Green Banking practices in Bangladesh.” IOSR J Bus Manag 2013;8:39–44. https://doi.org/10.9790/487x-0833944. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Masukujjaman M, Aktar S. Green Banking in Bangladesh: A Commitment towards the Global Initiatives. J Bus Technol 2014;8:17–40. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbt.v8i1-2.18284. [Google Scholar]
  16. Rahman MM, Ahsan MA, Hossain MM, Hoq MR. Green Banking Prospects in Bangladesh. Asian Bus Rev 2015;2:59. https://doi.org/10.18034/abr.v2i2.305. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zafar MB, Sulaiman AA. Measuring corporate social responsibility in Islamic banking: what matters? Int J Islam Middle East Financ Manag 2020;13:357–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-05-2019-0227. [Google Scholar]
  18. Cahyani GD, Utami PS, Darmadi RA. The Effect of Islamic Social Reporting on Performance of Maqashid Sharia 2023:431–6. [Google Scholar]
  19. Rahmania N, Suryaputri R V. The Influence of ISR, Profitability, ICG on the Performance of Maqashid Syariah with Intellectual Capital as an Intervening Variable 2020:28342–53. [Google Scholar]
  20. Salman KR, Muslich A, ... New Evidence On The Direct And Indirect Influence Of The Maqashid Sharia Index On The Islamic Social Reporting Index. Int J … 2018;5:165–73. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1405433. [Google Scholar]
  21. Riduwan R, Mutmainah L, Wahyudi R. Islamic Social Reporting Disclosure of Sharia Commercial Banks in Indonesia: A Form of Social Responsibility. Shirkah J Econ Bus 2020;5:337. https://doi.org/10.22515/shirkah.v5i3.336. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Suwarsi S, Azib AL. The Influence of Islamic Social Reporting to the Return on Asset (Case study of Islamic Banks in Indonesia). Int J Manag Int Bus Stud 2017;7:1–9. [Google Scholar]
  23. Alhammadi S, Alotaibi KO, Hakam DF. Analysing Islamic banking ethical performance from Maqāṣid al- Sharī‘ah perspective: evidence from Indonesia. J Sustain Financ Invest 2022;12:1171–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1848179. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ishak MSI, Asni F. The role of maqasid al-Shariʿah in applying fiqh muamalat into modern Islamic banking in Malaysia. J Islam Account Bus Res 2020;11:2137–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-12-2019-0224. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Akram Laldin M, Furqani H. Developing Islamic finance in the framework of maqasid al-Shari’ah: Understanding the ends (maqasid) and the means (wasa’il). Int J Islam Middle East Financ Manag 2013;6:278–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-05-2013-0057. [Google Scholar]
  26. Syafii M, Sanrego YD, Taufiq M. An Analysis of Islamic Banking Performance: Maqashid Index Implementation in Indonesia and Jordania. J Islam Financ 2012;1:12–29. [Google Scholar]
  27. Rai R, Kharel S, Devkota N, Paudel UR. Customers perception on green banking practices : A desk review. J Econ Concerns 2019;10:82–95. [Google Scholar]
  28. Khan SS, Jan SU, Abbas B. Green Banking: With Reference to Sustainable Development. Asian J Islam Financ 2016;1:14–35. [Google Scholar]
  29. Akter N, Siddik AB, Mondal MSAl. Sustainability Reporting on Green Financing : A Study of Listed Private Sustainability Reporting on Green Financing : A Study of Listed Private Commercial Banks in Bangladesh. J Bus Technol 2018;XII:14–27. [Google Scholar]
  30. Akhter I, Yasmin S, Faria N. Green Banking Practices And Its Implication On Financial Performance Of The Commercial Banks In Bangladesh. J Bus Adm 2021;42. [Google Scholar]
  31. Bouteraa M, Rizal Iskandar bin Raja Hisham R, Zainol Z. Green banking practices from islamic and western perspectives. Int J Business, Econ Law 2020;21:1–11. [Google Scholar]
  32. Tu TTT, Dung NTP. Factors affecting green banking practices: Exploratory factor analysis on Vietnamese banks. J Econ Dev 2017;24:04–30. https://doi.org/10.24311/JABES/2017.24.2.05. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Arsad S, Said R, Yusoff H, Haji-Othman Y, Ahmad R. The Relationship between Islamic Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm ’ s Performance : Empirical Evidence from Shari ’ ah Compliant Companies. Eur J Bus Manag 2014;6:161–74. [Google Scholar]
  34. Haniffa R. Social Reporting Disclosure: An Islamic Perspective. Indones Manag Account Res 2002;1:128–46. [Google Scholar]
  35. Julia T, Kassim S. Exploring green banking performance of Islamic banks vs conventional banks in Bangladesh based on Maqasid Shariah framework. J Islam Mark 2019;11:729–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-10-2017- 0105. [Google Scholar]
  36. Khairunnessa F, Vazquez-Brust DA, Yakovleva N. Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development: A Study of Commercial Banks in. Sustainability 2021;13:1904. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sharmeen K, Hasan R. Underpinning the benefits of green banking : A comparative study between Islamic and conventional banks in Bangladesh 2018:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22031. [Google Scholar]
  38. Bose S, Khan HZ, Monem RM. Does green banking performance pay off? Evidence from a unique regulatory setting in Bangladesh. Corp Gov An Int Rev 2021;29:162–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12349. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Nisha AR and N, Iqbal M, Suviitawat A. The role of commercial banks in green banking adoption : a Bangladesh perspective Afrin Rifat and Nabila Nisha * Mehree Iqbal Adisak Suviitawat. Int J Green Econ 2016;10:226–51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Iqbal M, Suviitawat A, Nisha N, Rifat A. The role of commercial banks in green banking adoption: a Bangladesh perspective. Int J Green Econ 2016;10:226. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijge.2016.10002862. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kala KN. A Study on The Impact of Green Banking Practices on Bank ’ s Environmental Performance With Special Reference To Coimbatore City 2020;15:1–6. [Google Scholar]
  42. Li J, Fu T, Han S, Liang R. Exploring the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance: The Moderating Role of Media Attention. Sustainability 2023;15:5023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Dai X, Siddik AB, Tian H. Corporate Social Responsibility, Green Finance and Environmental Performance: Does Green Innovation Matter? Sustain 2022;14:1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013607. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Maqbool S, Zameer MN. Corporate social responsibility and fi nancial performance : An empirical analysis of Indian banks. Futur Bus J 2018;4:84–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbj.2017.12.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Bagh T, Khan MA, Azad T, Saddique S, Khan MA. The Corporate Social Responsibility and Firms ’ Financial Performance : Evidence from Financial Sector of Pakistan 2017;7:301–8. [Google Scholar]
  46. World Population Review. Muslim Population by Country 2023 2023. [Google Scholar]
  47. Yao S, Zhang Z. Openness and Economic Performance: A Comparative Study of China and the Asian NIEs. J Chinese Econ Bus Stud 2003;1:71–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/1476528032000039758. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.