EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 571 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 571 (2024) 06001 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 571, 2024
1st International Conference on Management and Sustainable Environment (ICOMSE 2024)
Article Number 06001
Number of page(s) 8
Section Digital Business in Sustainable Environment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202457106001
Published online 20 September 2024
  1. S. Chouaibi and J. Chouaibi, “Social and ethical practices and firm value: the moderating effect of green innovation: evidence from international ESG data,” Int. J. Ethics Syst., 2021. [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Drempetic, C. Klein, and B. Zwergel, “The influence of firm size on the ESG score: Corporate sustainability ratings under review,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 167, no. 2, pp. 333–360, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. G. Friede, T. Busch, and A. Bassen, “ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies,” J. Sustain. Finance Invest., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 210–233, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Bénabou and J. Tirole, “Individual and corporate social responsibility,” Economica, vol. 77, no. 305, pp. 1–19, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Lioui and Z. Sharma, “Environmental corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Disentangling direct and indirect effects,” Ecol. Econ., vol. 78, pp. 100–111, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. D. C. Broadstock, R. Matousek, M. Meyer, and N. G. Tzeremes, “Does corporate social responsibility impact firms’ innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental & social governance implementation and innovation performance,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 119, pp. 99–110, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Chandrasekaran, K. Linderman, and R. Schroeder, “Antecedents to ambidexterity competency in high technology organizations,” J. Oper. Manag., vol. 30, no. 1–2, pp. 134–151, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Fernandez and N. Elfner, “ESG integration in corporate fixed income,” J. Appl. Corp. Finance, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 64–72, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. J. R. Carre, S. R. Curtis, and D. N. Jones, “Ascribing responsibility for online security and data breaches,” Manag. Audit. J., 2018. [Google Scholar]
  10. S. P. Ferris, M. Jagannathan, and A. C. Pritchard, “Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments,” J. Finance, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 1087–1111, 2003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. C. Joseph, J. Gunawan, Y. Sawani, M. Rahmat, J. A. Noyem, and F. Darus, “A comparative study of anti- corruption practice disclosure among Malaysian and Indonesian Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) best practice companies,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 112, pp. 2896–2906, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. L. Gherardi, J. Guthrie, and F. Farneti, “Stand-alone sustainability reporting and the use of GRI in Italian Vodafone: A longitudinal analysis,” Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 164, pp. 11–25, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. L.-H. Roller and L. Waverman, “Telecommunications infrastructure and economic development: A simultaneous approach,” Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 909–923, 2001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. U. K. Foresight, “The future of manufacturing: a new era of opportunity and challenge for the UK,” Summ. Rep. Gov. Off. Sci. Lond., vol. 20, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  15. N. Chevrollier, J. Zhang, T. van Leeuwen, and A. Nijhof, “The predictive value of strategic orientation for ESG performance over time,” Corp. Gov. Int. J. Bus. Soc., 2020. [Google Scholar]
  16. N. S. Jasni, H. Yusoff, M. M. Zain, N. M. Yusoff, and N. S. Shaffee, “Business strategy for environmental social governance practices: Evidence from telecommunication companies in Malaysia,” Soc. Responsib. J., 2019. [Google Scholar]
  17. H. Stein and S. Rosefielde, “Introduction to issues in finance, corporate control, and growth: Lessons from developing and transitional economies,” East. Econ. J., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 210–217, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Welford, “Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: Issues for Asia,” Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 42–51, 2007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. G. de la Fuente, M. Ortiz, and P. Velasco, “The value of a firm’s engagement in ESG practices: Are we looking at the right side?,” Long Range Plann., p. 102143, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Feng, J. W. Goodell, and D. Shen, “ESG rating and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China,” Finance Res. Lett., p. 102476, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  21. M. K. Linnenluecke, “Environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance in the context of multinational business research,” Multinatl. Bus. Rev., 2022. [Google Scholar]
  22. N. Ahmad, A. Mobarek, and N. N. Roni, “Revisiting the impact of ESG on financial performance of FTSE350 UK firms: Static and dynamic panel data analysis,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 1900500, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. T. Busch and G. Friede, “The robustness of the corporate social and financial performance relation: A second- order meta-analysis,” Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 583–608, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. G. Dorfleitner, G. Halbritter, and M. Nguyen, “Measuring the level and risk of corporate responsibility – An empirical comparison of different ESG rating approaches,” J. Asset Manag., vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 450–466, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1057/jam.2015.31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Hang, J. Geyer-Klingeberg, and A. W. Rathgeber, “It is merely a matter of time: A meta-analysis of the causality between environmental performance and financial performance,” Bus. Strategy Environ., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 257–273, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. B. J. Richardson, “Keeping ethical investment ethical: Regulatory issues for investing for sustainability,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 555–572, 2009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. M. C. Branco and L. L. Rodrigues, “Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 111–132, 2006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. H. N. Dang, K. Hoang, and L. Van Nguyen, “Do socially responsible firms always disclose high-quality earnings? Evidence from an emerging socialist economy,” Asian Rev. Account., 2021. [Google Scholar]
  29. V. Tohang, Y. Hutagaol-Martowidjojo, and K. Pirzada, “The link between ESG performance and earnings quality,” Australas. Account. Bus. Finance J., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 187–204, 2024, Accessed: Aug. 25, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk/id/eprint/15181 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. T. Janggu, F. Darus, M. M. Zain, and Y. Sawani, “Does good corporate governance lead to better sustainability reporting? An analysis using structural equation modeling,” Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 145, pp. 138–145, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. L. S. Mahoney, L. Thorne, L. Cecil, and W. LaGore, “A research note on standalone corporate social responsibility reports: Signaling or greenwashing?,” Crit. Perspect. Account., vol. 24, no. 4–5, pp. 350–359, 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. M. E. Porter, “Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors.” New York: Free Press, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  33. P. H. Fuchs, K. E. Mifflin, D. Miller, and J. O. Whitney, “Strategic integration: Competing in the age of capabilities,” Calif. Manage. Rev., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 118–147, 2000. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. A. Ginsberg and N. Venkatraman, “Contingency perspectives of organizational strategy: A critical review of the empirical research,” Acad. Manage. Rev., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 421–434, 1985. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. H. Håkansson and I. Snehota, “No business is an island: The network concept of business strategy,” Scand. J. Manag., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 187–200, 1989. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. J. B. Barney, “Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view,” J. Manag., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 643–650, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  37. A. Lockett, S. Thompson, and U. Morgenstern, “The development of the resource-based view of the firm: A critical appraisal,” Int. J. Manag. Rev., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 9–28, 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00252.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. S. Khanra, P. Kaur, R. P. Joseph, A. Malik, and A. Dhir, “A resource-based view of green innovation as a strategic firm resource: Present status and future directions,” Bus. Strategy Environ., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1395– 1413, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. N. O’Regan, A. Ghobadian, and M. Sims, “Fast tracking innovation in manufacturing SMEs,” Technovation, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 251–261, 2006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. D. J. Teece, G. Pisano, and A. Shuen, “(1997):‘Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.,’” Resour. Firms Strateg. Read. Resour.-Based Perspect., p. 268, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  41. A. Herzallah, L. J. Gutierrez-Gutierrez, and J. F. M. Rosas, “Quality ambidexterity, competitive strategies, and financial performance: An empirical study in industrial firms,” Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., 2017. [Google Scholar]
  42. P. S. Adler et al., “Perspectives on the productivity dilemma,” J. Oper. Manag., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 99–113, 2009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. K. Aoki and M. Wilhelm, “The role of ambidexterity in managing buyer–supplier relationships: The Toyota case,” Organ. Sci., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1080–1097, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. J. A. Mathews, “Resource and activities are two sides of the same coin: duality of the activities and resource- based views of strategic management,” in Conference on Strategic Management, Copenhagen, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  45. B. J. Weiner, “A theory of organizational readiness for change,” Implement. Sci., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. R. E. Miles, C. C. Snow, A. D. Meyer, and H. J. Coleman Jr, “Organizational strategy, structure, and process,” Acad. Manage. Rev., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 546–562, 1978. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. C. C. Snow, R. E. Miles, and G. Miles, “A configurational approach to the integration of strategy and organization research,” Strategic Organization, vol. 3, no. 4. Sage Publications London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi, pp. 431–439, 2005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Y. Yuan, L. Y. Lu, G. Tian, and Y. Yu, “Business strategy and corporate social responsibility,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 162, no. 2, pp. 359–377, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. L. J. A. Bakar and H. Ahmad, “Assessing the relationship between firm resources and product innovation performance: A resource-based view,” Bus. Process Manag. J., 2010. [Google Scholar]
  50. Y. Yuan, L. Y. Lu, G. Tian, and Y. Yu, “Business strategy and corporate social responsibility,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 162, pp. 359–377, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. S. Chouaibi, G. Festa, R. Quaglia, and M. Rossi, “The risky impact of digital transformation on organizational performance–evidence from Tunisia,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 178, p. 121571, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.