Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 573, 2024
2024 International Conference on Sustainable Development and Energy Resources (SDER 2024)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02020 | |
| Number of page(s) | 5 | |
| Section | Oil and Gas Resources Development and Energy Technology Innovation | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202457302020 | |
| Published online | 30 September 2024 | |
- National Development and Reform Commission. Assessment Measures for Renewable Energy Power Quota (Trial). Accessed Aug. 2014. [Google Scholar]
- National Development and Reform Commission. Notice on Establishing and Improving the Mechanism for Ensuring the Consumption of Renewable Energy Power. Accessed 10 May 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Upton Jr, Gregory B., and Brian F. Snyder. “Funding Renewable Energy: An Analysis of Renewable Portfolio Standards.” Energy Economics, vol. 66, 2017, pp. 205–216. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Barbose, Galen, et al. “Costs and Benefits of Renewables Portfolio Standards in the United States.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 52, 2015, pp. 523–533. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Barbose, Galen, et al. “A Retrospective Analysis of Benefits and Impacts of US Renewable Portfolio Standards.” Energy Policy, vol. 96, 2016, pp. 645–660. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Joshi, Jaee. “Do Renewable Portfolio Standards Increase Renewable Energy Capacity? Evidence from the United States.” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 287, 2021, p. 112261. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wiser, Ryan, et al. “The Experience with Renewable Portfolio Standards in the United States.” The Electricity Journal, vol. 20, no. 4, 2007, pp. 8–20. [Google Scholar]
- Yi, Binwen, et al. “Coordination of Policy Goals between Renewable Portfolio Standards and Carbon Caps: A Quantitative Assessment in China.” Applied Energy, vol. 237, 2019, pp. 25–35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Yu, Shuaishuai, et al. “Impacts of RPS and FIT on Inter-Regional Power Transmission Line Layout in China: Considerations of High Renewable Energy Penetration.” Energy Policy, vol. 178, 2023, p. 113615. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wang, B., et al. “Possible Design with Equity and Responsibility in China’s Renewable Portfolio Standards.” Applied Energy, vol. 232, 2018, pp. 685–694. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fan, J. L., et al. “Will China Achieve Its Renewable Portfolio Standard Targets? An Analysis from the Perspective of Supply and Demand.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 138, 2021, p. 110510. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Xu, J., et al. “Provincial Allocation of Renewable Portfolio Standard in China Based on Efficiency and Fairness Principles.” Renewable Energy, vol. 179, 2021, pp. 1233–1245. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, Da, et al. “Regional Allocation of Renewable Energy Quota in China under the Policy of Renewable Portfolio Standards.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 176, 2022, p. 105904. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Abrell, Jan, et al. “The Economics of Renewable Energy Support.” Journal of Public Economics, vol. 176, 2019, pp. 94–117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Abrell, Jan, et al. “Buffering Volatility: Storage Investments and Technology-Specific Renewable Energy Support.” Energy Economics, vol. 84, 2019, p. 104463. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Abrell, Jan, et al. “Trading of Renewable Targets–Who Wins and Who Loses.” The Future of Global Energy Systems, 17th IAEE European Conference, 21-24 Sept. 2022, International Association for Energy Economics. [Google Scholar]
- Abrell, Jan, et al. “The Economic and Climate Value of Flexibility in Green Energy Markets.” Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 83, no. 2, 2022, pp. 289–312. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Tian, et al. “Climate Module Disparities Explain Inconsistent Estimates of the Social Cost of Carbon in Integrated Assessment Models.” One Earth, vol. 5, no. 7, 2022, pp. 767–778. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Da, et al. “Spatially Resolved Land and Grid Model of Carbon Neutrality in China.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 121, no. 10, 2024, p. e2306517121. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.