Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 577, 2024
4th International Conference on Applied Sciences (ICAS 2024) “Multidisciplinary Research Collaboration for Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Issues”
Article Number 01010
Number of page(s) 5
Section Environmental Issues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202457701010
Published online 11 October 2024
  1. IUCN, Issues Br. (2021) [Google Scholar]
  2. J. R. Jambeck, R. Geyer, C. Wilcox, T. R. Siegler, M. Perryman, A. Andrady, R. Narayan, and K. L. Law, Science (80-. ). 347, 768 (2015) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Coyle, G. Hardiman, and K. O. Driscoll, Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 2, 100010 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. L. G. A. Barboza, A. Dick Vethaak, B. R. B. O. Lavorante, A.-K. Lundebye, and L. Guilhermino, Mar. Pollut. Bull. 133, 336 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. N. Simon, Ensia (2016) [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Howes, V. Agarwal, and M. Woolf, Growth, Inequality and the Environment: AnIntroduction to Some of the Big Ideas and Debates of Our Time (Crawford School of Public Policy, ANU, 2023) [Google Scholar]
  7. X. Xu, Y. Hou, C. Zhao, L. Shi, and Y. Gong, Mar. Policy 134, 104774 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. F. de Vries, N. Beaumont, Tobias, J. Clark, N. Hanley, R. Johnston, K. Meginnis, and C. Stapenhurst, Significant Benefits from International Cooperation over Marine Plastic Pollution (2023) [Google Scholar]
  9. D. Bodansky, in Oxford Handb. Int. Environ. Law (Oxford University Press, 2021), pp. 402–C24.S24 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. B. H. Desai, in Int. Environ. Gov. (Brill | Nijhoff, 2014), pp. 219–261 [Google Scholar]
  11. GRID-Arendal, Crafting an Effective Treaty on Plastic Pollution: Emerging FaultLines in the Intergovernmental Negotiations (Arendal, 2022) [Google Scholar]
  12. A. M. Rosen, Polit. Policy 43, 30 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. D. W. Fahey, Theor. Inq. Law 14, (2013) [Google Scholar]
  14. G. J. M. Velders, S. O. Andersen, J. S. Daniel, D. W. Fahey, and M. McFarland, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104, 4814 (2007) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. E. O. Nyekwere, Int. Aff. Glob. Strateg. (2020) [Google Scholar]
  16. C. Warbrick, D. McGoldrick, and P. G. G. Davies, Int. Comp. Law Q. 47, 446 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Brack, International Trade and the Montreal Protocol (Routledge, 2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. R. McKenzie, G. Bernhard, B. Liley, P. Disterhoft, S. Rhodes, A. Bais, O. Morgenstern, P. Newman, L. Oman, C. Brogniez, and S. Simic, Sci. Rep. 9, 12332 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. R. Sandford, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 16, 3 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. K. O’Neill, in Environ. Int. Relations (Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 104–134 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. K. Raubenheimer, Towards an Improved Framework to Prevent Marine PlasticDebris, University of Wollongong, 2016 [Google Scholar]
  22. UNEP, Combating Marine Plastic Litter and Microplastics: An Assessment of theEffectiveness of Relevant International, Regional and Subregional Governance Strategies and Approaches (Nairobi, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  23. I. T. Wysocki and P. Le Billon, Environ. Sci. Policy 100, 94 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. N. Kunz, K. Mayers, and L. N. Van Wassenhove, Calif. Manage. Rev. 60, 45 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. KPMG, KPMG (2021) [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Finus, Game Theory and International Environmental Cooperation (EdwardElgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, 2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. U. Beyerlin, P.-T. Stoll, and R. Wolfrum, Conclusions Draw. from Conf. EnsuringCompliance With MEAs 359 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  28. K. Raubenheimer and A. McIlgorm, Mar. Policy 81, 322 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.