Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 579, 2024
2024 11th International Conference on Civil and Urban Engineering (ICCUE 2024)
Article Number 01003
Number of page(s) 8
Section Structural Engineering and Non-Destructive Monitoring of Buildings
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202457901003
Published online 18 October 2024
  1. O. Amer, D. Aita, D.V. Bompa et al., Conservation-oriented integrated approach for structural stability assessment of complex historic masonry structures, J. Eng. Res., (2024) [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Bello, N. Santillan, A. Cochachin et al., ICE thickness using ground penetrating radar at Znosko Glacier on King George Island, in Proceedings of 2020 IEEE Latin American GRSS & ISPRS Remote Sensing Conference, LAGIRS, Santiago, Chile (2020) [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Liu, S. Wang, Y. He et al., Estimation of ice thickness and the features of subglacial media detected by ground penetrating radar at the Baishui River Glacier no. 1 in Mt. Yulong, China, Remote Sens., 12, 24, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Wang, Z. Leng, Z. Zhang et al., Automatic asphalt layer interface detection and thickness determination from ground-penetrating radar data, Constr. Build. Mater., 357, 129434, (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Wang, S. Zhao, I.L. Al-Qadi, Real-time density and thickness estimation of thin asphalt pavement overlay during compaction using ground penetrating radar data, Surv. Geophys., 41, 431–445, (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. G. Ludeno, N. Cavalagli, F. Ubertini et al., On the combined use of ground penetrating radar and crack meter sensors for structural monitoring: Application to the historical Consoli Palace in Gubbio, Italy, Surv. Geophys., 41, 647–667, (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. F. Lombardi, M. Lualdi, E. Garavaglia, Masonry texture reconstruction for building seismic assessment: practical evaluation and potentials of ground penetrating radar methodology, Constr. Build. Mater., 299, 124189, (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. H. Zadhoush, A. Giannopoulos, Optimizing GPR time‐zero adjustment and two‐way travel time wavelet measurements using a realistic three‐dimensional numerical model, Near Surf. Geophys., 20, 2, 208–226, (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. B. Oskooi, S. Parnow, M. Smirnov et al., Attenuation of random noise in GPR data by image processing, Arab. J. Geosci., 11, 1–10, (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Chopra, K.J. Marfurt, Seismic attributes—A historical perspective, Geophys., 70, 5, 3SO–28SO, (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Fomel, Local seismic attributes, Geophys., 72, 3, A29–A33, (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. R. De Angelis Bertolotti, G. Ioppolo, G. Pisani Sartorio, La villa di Massenzio sull’Appia Antica. Palazzo-Circo-Mausoleo, Roma, (1988) [Google Scholar]
  13. G. Ioppolo, G.P. Sartorio, La villa di Massenzio sulla Via Appia: il circo, Colombo, (1999) [Google Scholar]
  14. L. Bianchini Ciampoli, R. Santarelli, E.M. Loreti et al., Structural detailing of buried Roman baths through GPR inspection, Archaeol. Prospect., 30, 1, 3–11, (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. L. Bianchini Ciampoli, R. Santarelli, P. Meriggi et al., Multisensors for BIM modeling and digital twinning of historical buildings: preliminary results on Circus of Maxentius in Rome, in Proceedings Volume 12621, Multimodal Sensing and Artificial Intelligence: Technologies and Applications III; 1262104 (2023), SPIE, Munich, Germany (2023) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.